Fivem

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data for Fivem with the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, the High preset provides the most balanced experience across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 126 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth multiplayer gameplay. Moving to 2560x1440, High still maintains a strong 83 FPS average, and even at 3840x2160, it holds at 46 FPS. This makes High the only preset that remains playable across the board without dipping into the low 30s.

The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding 98 FPS at 1080p, 65 FPS at 1440p, and only 36 FPS at 4K. The 4K result is borderline for a multiplayer title, as the data shows a significant drop from 46 FPS (High) to 36 FPS (Ultra). The Medium preset sits comfortably in the middle, offering 158 FPS at 1080p, 104 FPS at 1440p, and 58 FPS at 4K. For users with high-refresh-rate 1080p displays, the Low preset at 200 FPS is the clear choice for maximizing frame rates, though it sacrifices visual fidelity.

The data suggests that the High preset is the sweet spot for this combination. It provides a 28% higher average FPS than Medium at 1080p (126 vs 158 is actually lower—wait, 158 is higher than 126, so Medium is faster; the correct interpretation is that High is 20% slower than Medium, but still delivers excellent playability). At 4K, High is 22% faster than Medium (46 vs 58 is lower, so High is slower; the actual delta shows Medium is 26% faster than High). Given the trade-offs, High offers the best compromise between visual quality and performance, especially for users targeting 60 FPS at 1440p.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The High preset delivers an 83 FPS average at 2560x1440, which is ideal for smooth multiplayer action. The Medium preset reaches 104 FPS, but the visual upgrade from Medium to High is worth the 20% performance cost, as the frame rate remains well above 60 FPS.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 3840x2160, the High preset achieves 46 FPS, and the Medium preset reaches 58 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 36 FPS, which may feel sluggish in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. For a consistent 60 FPS at 4K, users may need to adjust settings below Medium, as the data shows no preset reaches that threshold.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 21,765 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-14600T and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, indicating near-identical multi-threaded capability among these four processors.

Q: What is the GPU's raw compute performance relative to its nearest competitors?

A: The Radeon RX 6750 XT has an average benchmark score of 26,011, which is 0.5% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X and 0.6% higher than the AMD FirePro W7100. It leads the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.1%, showing a slight edge in synthetic tests.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F's single-core performance sufficient for Fivem?

A: The CPU scores 3,072 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3,689 in PassMark single-thread. Given that Fivem is a multiplayer title that often relies on single-threaded performance for game logic, these scores indicate strong capability, as the CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration, and does it matter for Fivem?

A: The Radeon RX 6750 XT features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This capacity is ample for Fivem at high settings, as the measured FPS data shows no signs of memory-related stuttering, even at 4K with Ultra settings.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, plays a pivotal role in Fivem's performance. The GPU has a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz. These clocks translate to a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s, which are critical for rendering the dense environments typical of multiplayer servers.

The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, paired with a 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, ensures that texture streaming and asset loading do not become bottlenecks. This is reflected in the measured FPS data, where the GPU consistently delivers higher frame rates at lower settings. At 1080p, the GPU achieves 200 FPS on Low, 158 FPS on Medium, 126 FPS on High, and 98 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 51% performance drop, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiter at this resolution when pushing higher settings.

At 1440p, the GPU's workload increases, resulting in 132 FPS on Low, 104 FPS on Medium, 83 FPS on High, and 65 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results further emphasize the GPU's role: 73 FPS on Low, 58 FPS on Medium, 46 FPS on High, and 36 FPS on Ultra. The GPU's 40 ray accelerators (RT cores) and 2,560 shading units contribute to its ability to handle these loads, but the data shows that even with 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, 4K Ultra remains a challenge.

The GPU's 71st percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,011, places it just ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M395X by 0.5% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.1%. This suggests that while the RX 6750 XT is not a top-tier card, it provides sufficient headroom for Fivem at mainstream resolutions, with the 12 GB VRAM ensuring no capacity issues arise.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of how the Ryzen 5 7400F and RX 6750 XT perform across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the lowest preset (Low) delivers an average of 200 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded in the dataset. The Medium preset follows at 158 FPS, with a minimum of 134 FPS and a maximum of 182 FPS. High settings yield 126 FPS, while Ultra drops to 98 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 102 FPS, a 51% reduction, showing that the GPU is heavily taxed by higher settings.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings average 132 FPS, Medium averages 104 FPS with a range of 88 to 120 FPS, High averages 83 FPS, and Ultra averages 65 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at High settings is from 126 FPS to 83 FPS, a 34% decrease, which aligns with the increased pixel count. The Medium preset at 1440p (104 FPS) is nearly identical to the High preset at 1080p (126 FPS), highlighting the resolution's impact.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is pushed to its limits. Low settings still manage 73 FPS, Medium averages 58 FPS with a minimum of 49 FPS and a maximum of 66 FPS, High drops to 46 FPS, and Ultra falls to 36 FPS. The 4K Medium result is notable because it is the only preset at this resolution with a reported minimum FPS, suggesting that the GPU can maintain a playable range in most scenarios. The Ultra preset at 36 FPS is below the 60 FPS target, making it the least desirable option for competitive play.

The data also shows that the Medium preset has the most consistent frame pacing, as evidenced by the min/max values at 1080p (134-182) and 1440p (88-120). This is likely due to the balanced load on the GPU, whereas Low and High may exhibit more variance in less predictable multiplayer environments.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights into the system's bottleneck. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 200 at 1080p to 132 at 1440p (a 34% reduction) and then to 73 at 4K (a 45% reduction from 1440p). This steep decline indicates that the GPU is the primary limiter, as the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are capable of feeding frames at higher rates.

At Medium settings, the FPS goes from 158 at 1080p to 104 at 1440p (-34%) and then to 58 at 4K (-44%). The consistency of these percentage drops across settings suggests a uniform scaling pattern, which is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU, with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,765, does not appear to throttle performance at lower resolutions, as the FPS at 1080p Low (200) is well beyond typical display refresh rates.

At High settings, the FPS scales from 126 at 1080p to 83 at 1440p (-34%) and then to 46 at 4K (-45%). The 4K High result of 46 FPS is close to the 1440p Ultra result of 65 FPS, indicating that the pixel count is the dominant factor. At Ultra settings, the FPS drops from 98 at 1080p to 65 at 1440p (-34%) and then to 36 at 4K (-45%).

The consistent ~34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and ~45% drop from 1440p to 4K across all settings points to a GPU-bound system. The RX 6750 XT's 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 13.31 TFLOPS of compute are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K, especially with Ultra settings. The CPU's role is secondary, as its single-core score of 3,072 in Cinebench R23 and 3,689 in PassMark single-thread are more than adequate for Fivem's engine, which is reflected in the high FPS at 1080p.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, plays a supporting role in this Fivem configuration. With a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, the CPU is capable of delivering high single-threaded performance, which is crucial for multiplayer games that often have a single primary game thread. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,072 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,689 put it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating strong per-core capability.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU scores 21,765 in Cinebench R23 and 25,645 in PassMark multi-thread. These scores are within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-14600T and Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, based on the nearestRivals data. This parity suggests that the Ryzen 5 7400F is well-equipped to handle the background tasks and physics simulations that Fivem servers may run, even though the game's frame rate is primarily GPU-limited.

The CPU's 32 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth) ensure that data is fed to the GPU without stalling. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (200 FPS) demonstrates that the CPU can push frame rates beyond common refresh rates, indicating that it is not a bottleneck in this scenario. However, as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the CPU's workload decreases relatively, as seen in the consistent FPS drops across settings.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and 5 nm process node (TSMC) also contribute to efficient operation, though the data does not include power consumption metrics. The CPU's launch MSRP of $229 positions it as a mid-range option, but the benchmark results show that its performance rivals higher-tier processors, making it a solid foundation for this GPU.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1,318th out of 3,005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 56th percentile of all configurations. This mid-pack ranking reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions, as the combo excels at 1080p but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with Ultra settings.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 26,011 places it in the 71st percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU's average score of 32,750 places it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The combo's rank is dragged down by the GPU's performance, which is only 1.1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile in synthetic tests. However, in Fivem specifically, the measured FPS data shows that the combo delivers playable performance at 1080p and 1440p on High settings, which are the most common resolutions for this multiplayer title.

Compared to other combos, this pairing is well-suited for users who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p, as the 200 FPS on Low settings is among the highest in the dataset. The 1440p High result of 83 FPS is also competitive, placing this combo in a position where it can handle competitive play without sacrificing visual quality. The 4K results, while not ideal, are still playable on Medium settings (58 FPS), making this a versatile configuration for users with varying display capabilities.

The rank of 1,318 suggests that there are many combos with either stronger GPUs or more balanced CPU-GPU pairings, but the data shows that this specific combo offers a consistent experience across all settings, with no significant performance anomalies. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and the CPU's strong single-threaded performance make this a reliable choice for Fivem, even if it does not top the charts.