Fivem

# Fivem Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 7400F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested system combinations in Fivem?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT ranks 2096th out of 3005 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database for this game.

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 159 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This drops to 78 FPS at the same resolution with Ultra settings.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Radeon RX 6600 XT has an average benchmark score of 24442. It sits 0.7% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277), 0.8% above the GTX 780 Ti (24236), and 1.1% above the RTX 2080 SUPER (24170), while trailing the Intel Arc A350M by 0.8% (24647).

Q: What is the CPU's single-core and multi-core performance profile?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F scores 3072 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 21765 in multi-core. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3689, with a multithread score of 25645 and an average benchmark score of 32750.

Q: Does the combo maintain playable frame rates at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 28 (Ultra) to 58 (Low). Medium settings yield 46 FPS average with a minimum of 39, while High produces 37 FPS average. Only Low settings approach 60 FPS at 4K.

Q: How does the CPU rank relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F's average score of 32750 places it 0.1% above the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707) and 0.2% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697), while trailing the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H by 0.2% (32812).

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It contains 11,060 million transistors across a 237 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1968 MHz, a game clock of 2359 MHz, and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, along with 32 ray tracing cores. The GPU delivers a pixel rate of 165.7 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 331.4 GTexel/s, and 10.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The card's 160 W TDP requires a suggested 450 W power supply and a single 8-pin connector. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

In Fivem, the GPU's role is evident across the measured FPS data. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo reaches 159 FPS average, indicating the GPU has headroom to spare. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 28 FPS, showing the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions and quality presets. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM capacity and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth appear sufficient for the game's demands at 1080p and 1440p, where frame rates remain respectable even at High settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2096th out of 3005 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the 70th percentile of the database (roughly the 30th percentile from the top). This position suggests the pairing is not optimized for this particular game, despite the individual components having moderate-to-decent synthetic benchmark scores.

The GPU's percentile vs all GPUs is 70, and the CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 83. The combination of a strong CPU with a mid-range GPU results in a system that ranks lower than either component's individual percentile would suggest. This indicates that Fivem's performance characteristics favor the GPU more heavily, and the RX 6600 XT's capabilities limit the overall result.

When examining the GPU's nearest rivals, the RX 6600 XT's average benchmark score of 24442 is nearly identical to the GTX 1630 (24277, +0.7%), Arc A350M (24647, -0.8%), GTX 780 Ti (24236, +0.8%), and RTX 2080 SUPER (24170, +1.1%). These close margins in synthetic tests do not translate to identical gaming performance, but they contextualize where the GPU sits in the broader hardware landscape.

The CPU's ranking among rivals shows a tighter cluster: the Ryzen 5 7400F (32750) is within 0.3% of the i5-14600T (32707), Core Ultra 7 155H (32697), Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812), and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662). This suggests the CPU provides consistent compute performance relative to its peers, but the GPU becomes the differentiating factor in Fivem's frame delivery.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers an average FPS of 159 on Low settings, 126 on Medium (with a minimum of 107 and maximum of 144), 100 on High, and 78 on Ultra. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline of roughly 20-25 FPS per quality tier, with the largest single drop occurring between Medium and High (26 FPS decrease).

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS falls to 105 on Low, 83 on Medium (minimum 70, maximum 95), 66 on High, and 51 on Ultra. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is substantial: Low loses 54 FPS (-34%), Medium loses 43 FPS (-34%), High loses 34 FPS (-34%), and Ultra loses 27 FPS (-35%). The consistency of these percentage drops indicates the GPU is scaling predictably with pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 58 on Low, 46 on Medium (minimum 39, maximum 53), 37 on High, and 28 on Ultra. The 4K results show a more dramatic decline: compared to 1440p, Low loses 47 FPS (-45%), Medium loses 37 FPS (-45%), High loses 29 FPS (-44%), and Ultra loses 23 FPS (-45%). The uniform scaling pattern across all settings at each resolution suggests a consistent GPU bottleneck at higher pixel counts.

The Medium settings rows include min/max data at every resolution, providing insight into frame pacing. At 1080p Medium, the range is 107-144 FPS, a spread of 37 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the range narrows to 70-95 FPS (25 FPS spread), and at 4K Medium, it narrows further to 39-53 FPS (14 FPS spread). This tightening of the frame range as resolution increases indicates the GPU is becoming more consistently saturated.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance on which settings preset delivers the best experience. At 1080p, the Low preset yields 159 FPS average, which is well above typical display refresh rates and provides maximum responsiveness. The Medium preset at 126 FPS average with a minimum of 107 FPS still offers excellent fluidity while improving visual quality. High at 100 FPS remains smooth, but Ultra at 78 FPS begins to show diminishing returns for the visual uplift.

At 1440p, the situation shifts. Low produces 105 FPS, which is still highly playable. Medium at 83 FPS average (minimum 70) offers a good balance between visual fidelity and smoothness. High at 66 FPS is borderline for competitive play but acceptable for casual sessions. Ultra at 51 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider the minimum for a comfortable experience.

At 4K, none of the presets deliver ideal results. Low at 58 FPS is closest to 60 but may suffer from visual compromises. Medium at 46 FPS average with a 39 FPS minimum is playable but not fluid. High at 37 FPS and Ultra at 28 FPS are below acceptable thresholds for most players.

The optimal recommendation is 1080p Medium or High. The Medium preset provides 126 FPS average with a 107 FPS minimum, ensuring consistent frame delivery without the visual degradation of Low. For players prioritizing competitive performance, 1080p Low at 159 FPS is the best choice. At 1440p, Medium is the recommended compromise, as it maintains a 70 FPS minimum while offering improved image quality over Low. The data does not support 4K gaming with this combo unless the player accepts Low settings at 58 FPS.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture codenamed Raphael. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 6,570 million transistors on a 71 mm² die. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates strong single-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3689. Multi-threaded performance is also robust, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 21765 and PassMark multithread scoring 25645. The CPU's average benchmark score of 32750 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs.

In Fivem, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions. The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 1440p and 4K shows consistent percentage drops (approximately 34% and 45% respectively) across all settings, which is characteristic of GPU-bound performance. The CPU's strong single-core scores suggest it can keep up with the game's physics and simulation demands, particularly at 1080p Low where 159 FPS is achieved.

The CPU's nearest rivals all have similar average scores (within 0.3%), yet the combo ranking remains at 2096th out of 3005. This indicates that Fivem's performance ceiling is determined by the GPU, and the Ryzen 5 7400F's compute capabilities are not the limiting factor in this configuration.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data across resolutions reveals a consistent pattern of GPU-bound scaling. Moving from 1080p to 1440p, every settings preset loses approximately 34-35% of its average frame rate. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the loss is approximately 44-45% for every preset. This uniform scaling across all quality levels indicates that the GPU's rendering pipeline is the primary constraint as pixel count increases.

At 1080p, the combo achieves 159 FPS on Low and 78 FPS on Ultra, a ratio of roughly 2:1 between the lowest and highest quality presets. At 1440p, this ratio becomes 105:51, also approximately 2:1. At 4K, the ratio is 58:28, again maintaining the same proportional relationship. The consistency of these ratios suggests that the GPU's performance scales linearly with the rendering workload imposed by each preset.

The 4K results are particularly revealing. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 28 represents a 65% drop from the 1080p Ultra score of 78. At 4K Low, the 58 FPS average represents a 64% drop from 1080p Low's 159 FPS. These percentage drops are nearly identical across settings, confirming that the GPU is the limiting component at all quality levels when the resolution increases.

The CPU's role in this scaling is minimal. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see smaller percentage drops at higher resolutions (where the GPU becomes less stressed) and larger absolute FPS differences at lower resolutions. Instead, the data shows consistent proportional drops, which is the hallmark of a GPU-limited scenario in a game like Fivem where the multi-player environment adds CPU overhead but does not scale with resolution.

Given the GPU's 70th percentile ranking and the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking, the resolution scaling data suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant frame rate improvements, particularly at 1440p and 4K. The CPU has sufficient headroom to support a more powerful GPU, as evidenced by its strong single-core and multi-core benchmark results.