Fivem

Fivem

AVERAGE FPS
98
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 37 46 60 71
1440p QHD 61 81 104 129
1080p Full HD 99 123 159 200

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 60
3840x2160 High 46
3840x2160 Ultra 37
2560x1440 Low 129
2560x1440 Medium 104
2560x1440 High 81
2560x1440 Ultra 61
1920x1080 Low 200
1920x1080 Medium 159
1920x1080 High 123
1920x1080 Ultra 99

Fivem with AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer title, and the data for the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT combination shows a system that is clearly capable of high refresh rates at 1080p but begins to buckle under the weight of higher resolutions. The benchmark results reveal a pattern where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count increases, while the CPU holds its ground well in this particular title.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and tells a clear story about where the bottleneck lies. At Ultra settings, the average FPS falls from 99.1 at 1920x1080 to 61.4 at 2560x1440, representing a 38% reduction. Pushing further to 3840x2160, the average drops to 37.3, which is a 62% reduction from the 1080p baseline. This aggressive scaling is classic GPU-bound behavior; the RX 6750 XT is being saturated by the increasing pixel workload, and the CPU has headroom to spare.

The pattern is consistent across all settings. At Low settings, the system delivers 200.2 FPS at 1080p, which then drops to 128.8 at 1440p and further to 71.4 at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 1440p at Low settings (a 36% drop) is nearly identical to the gap seen at Ultra (a 38% drop), which strongly suggests the GPU is the limiting component in both cases. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would typically see a smaller percentage drop when reducing resolution, as the CPU workload remains relatively constant.

The data indicates that this pairing is optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At 4K, the system falls below the 60 FPS threshold at High and Ultra settings, making it a less viable option for smooth gameplay at that resolution. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on the GPU is sufficient for the workloads, but the raw compute power of the 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance is what limits the 4K experience.

Settings Recommendations

For a 60 FPS target, the sweet spot for this combination is 1440p with High settings, which yields an average of 80.6 FPS. This provides a solid margin above the target, allowing for some dips without falling below playability. If you prefer a higher refresh rate experience, 1080p at High settings delivers 123.3 FPS, which is well-suited for a 120Hz or 144Hz monitor.

At 4K, the choices are more constrained. Medium settings produce 59.7 FPS, which is just shy of a 60 FPS target. Low settings at 4K achieve 71.4 FPS, making it the only 4K preset in the measured data that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS. However, the visual compromise at Low settings may be significant for some users. The Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended, as the 37.3 FPS average is below the threshold for a smooth experience.

For most users, the data suggests that 1440p Medium is the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, offering 104.1 FPS. This is a significant step up from the 61.4 FPS at Ultra, and the visual difference between Medium and Ultra is often less noticeable in a fast-paced multiplayer environment. The 1080p Medium preset, at 158.6 FPS, is an excellent choice for competitive play where maximum frame rates are prioritized.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Fivem at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only at lower settings. The measured data shows 71.4 FPS at Low and 59.7 FPS at Medium for 3840x2160. High and Ultra settings at 4K average 45.7 and 37.3 FPS respectively, which are below the generally accepted 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 provides an average of 80.6 FPS, which is a good balance. If you need more performance, Medium at 104.1 FPS is the next step down. Ultra at 61.4 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes.

Q: How does the CPU affect performance in Fivem?

A: The Ryzen 7 3700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, appears sufficient for this game. The resolution scaling data shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as frame rates drop proportionally with increased resolution. The CPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks, such as a 19087 score in Cinebench R23 multicore, indicates it is not holding the system back.

Q: Is the RX 6750 XT a good match for the Ryzen 7 3700X?

A: The benchmark data indicates a well-balanced pairing for 1080p and 1440p. At 1080p Ultra, the system achieves 99.1 FPS, suggesting the GPU is doing the heavy lifting. At 1440p High, the 80.6 FPS result shows a strong combination that should handle most multiplayer scenarios.

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this combo?

A: The highest recorded average is 200.2 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is a very high frame rate, ideal for competitive play on a high-refresh-rate monitor.

Q: How does this combo rank among other tested systems?

A: The combination ranks 903rd out of 1792 tested combos for this game, placing it in the top half of all configurations. This suggests it is a mid-to-upper tier performer for Fivem.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best performance. The Low preset averages 200.2 FPS, followed by Medium at 158.6 FPS and High at 123.3 FPS. The Ultra preset, while still strong, drops to 99.1 FPS. This shows that at 1080p, the RX 6750 XT has ample power to push very high frame rates, and even the most demanding settings remain well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low averages 128.8 FPS, Medium 104.1 FPS, and High 80.6 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 61.4 FPS, which is right at the edge of playability for many users. This resolution appears to be the practical limit for high-refresh-rate gaming with this hardware.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly taxed. The Low preset averages 71.4 FPS, which is playable. Medium drops to 59.7 FPS, and High falls to 45.7 FPS. The Ultra preset is the worst performer, with an average of 37.3 FPS. These numbers suggest that 4K is only viable with significant graphical compromises.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 903 out of 1792 tested configurations places this system in the 50th percentile of all tested hardware for Fivem. This is a solid mid-pack result, indicating that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it is far from a low-end performer. The ranking reflects a system that can handle the game well at mainstream resolutions.

The CPU's percentile rank of 85 versus all CPUs is notably high, suggesting the Ryzen 7 3700X is a capable processor relative to the wider market. The GPU's percentile rank of 79 versus all GPUs is also strong. However, the combo rank of 903 suggests that the specific pairing of these two components is not perfectly optimized for Fivem, or that many other systems with more powerful GPUs are being tested.

The nearest rivals for the CPU, such as the Intel Core i5-12600, have an average score within 0.1% of the 3700X, showing that the CPU is competitive with its direct peers. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, is a mobile part, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is about 1.3% faster on average. This data points to a system that is consistently outclassed by higher-tier GPUs, which explains its mid-tier combo ranking.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Matisse. It has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. In the context of Fivem, these specifications are more than adequate. The game’s performance scaling with resolution strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor, not the CPU.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is strong, evidenced by a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8016 and a Passmark multithread score of 22458. Its single-thread performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2694. These scores suggest that the processor can handle the game's simulation and logic threads without becoming a bottleneck, even when the GPU is pushed hard at 4K.

The 32 MB of L3 cache and support for DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s are sufficient for this workload. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 200.2 FPS, which is a frame rate that would stress many CPUs. The fact that the system can deliver this without apparent CPU limitations suggests the Ryzen 7 3700X is a strong match for the RX 6750 XT in this specific game.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2600 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Fivem

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 71.4
3840x2160 Medium 59.7
3840x2160 High 45.7
3840x2160 Ultra 37.3
2560x1440 Low 128.8
2560x1440 Medium 104.1
2560x1440 High 80.6
2560x1440 Ultra 61.4
1920x1080 Low 200.2
1920x1080 Medium 158.6
1920x1080 High 123.3
1920x1080 Ultra 99.1

Fivem with Ryzen 7 3700X + Other GPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Fivem with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 3700X + RX 6750 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.