Fivem

# How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT places at rank 878 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This positions the pairing in the middle of the pack, meaning roughly half of all tested system configurations deliver higher average frame rates in this multiplayer title. The data suggests this combo is neither a top-tier performer nor a laggard—it occupies a solidly mainstream position that should handle the game's typical demands without major compromise.

The CPU itself sits at the 88th percentile against all processors, which is a strong showing for a desktop chip. Its nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark scores include the Intel Core i7-12800H and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645, with delta percentages of 0 and 0.2 respectively. Meanwhile, the GPU lands at the 79th percentile against all graphics cards, with its closest competitor being the AMD Radeon RX 5600M at a 0.2 delta. These percentile positions hint that the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card within this pairing, which becomes relevant when analyzing where bottlenecks appear in the measured FPS data.

# GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock reaches 2600 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz and a base clock of 2150 MHz. This memory configuration is substantial for a mid-range card, and in Fivem—a game that often involves large open-world maps with many player-created assets—the 12 GB capacity provides headroom for texture-heavy scenes without hitting VRAM ceilings.

The GPU's RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. Its 40 ray accelerators support DirectX 12 Ultimate, though Fivem rarely leverages ray tracing in meaningful ways. The card's FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS suggests it can handle the game's draw calls and shader work efficiently, but the measured FPS data reveals that at higher settings and resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

What stands out is how the GPU behaves across settings at each resolution. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 197.9 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra it drops to 96.6 FPS—a 51% reduction. This steep scaling indicates the GPU's raw throughput is being taxed heavily by the Ultra preset's increased geometric complexity and post-processing effects. The card's 166.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 416.0 GTexel/s texture rate are sufficient for 1080p gaming, but the data implies they struggle to maintain high frame rates when all visual bells are enabled.

# Resolution Scaling

Moving from 1080p to 4K reveals clear bottleneck behavior. At 1080p High, the combo delivers 128.9 FPS. At 1440p High, it drops to 84.1 FPS—a 34.8% reduction. At 4K High, it falls to 44.1 FPS, which is 65.8% below the 1080p figure. This scaling pattern is consistent with GPU-bound performance, where the RX 6750 XT's bandwidth and compute resources are progressively overwhelmed as pixel count increases.

The Low preset tells a similar story but with higher absolute numbers. 1080p Low runs at 197.9 FPS, 1440p Low at 130.7 FPS, and 4K Low at 73.7 FPS. The percentage drops from 1080p to 1440p (34%) and from 1440p to 4K (43.6%) are less severe than at High settings, suggesting that when the GPU is less stressed, the CPU has more room to keep frame rates elevated. However, the fact that even 4K Low fails to reach 75 FPS indicates that at this resolution, the GPU's 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 13.31 TFLOPS are simply insufficient for smooth high-refresh gaming.

The data implies that the i5-14400F is not the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads, with boost clock reaching 4.70 GHz, are more than capable of feeding the GPU at 1080p and 1440p. But at 4K, the GPU's limitations dominate, and the CPU's potential headroom goes unused. This is classic GPU-bound scaling, where upgrading the graphics card would yield larger FPS gains than upgrading the processor.

# Settings Recommendations

For 4K gaming, the measured rows show that High settings produce 44.1 FPS, Medium produces 59.5 FPS, and Low produces 73.7 FPS. Ultra drops to 32.6 FPS, which is below playable thresholds for most users. The data suggests that at 4K, Low settings are the only viable option for maintaining a fluid experience, while Medium offers a compromise at 59.5 FPS that approaches but doesn't quite hit 60 FPS. High and Ultra are not recommended at this resolution given the sub-45 FPS averages.

At 1440p, the picture brightens considerably. High settings deliver 84.1 FPS, Medium delivers 105.3 FPS, and Low reaches 130.7 FPS. Ultra runs at 62.2 FPS, which is playable but leaves little margin for dips. The sweet spot appears to be Medium, which offers a 25.2% improvement over High while maintaining visual quality that is likely acceptable for most players. For those prioritizing frame rate, Low at 130.7 FPS provides a buttery experience that exceeds most 1440p monitors' refresh rates.

At 1080p, all settings are playable. Ultra delivers 96.6 FPS, High 128.9 FPS, Medium 159 FPS, and Low 197.9 FPS. Given that the i5-14400F and RX 6750 XT can handle Ultra at nearly 100 FPS, this is the resolution where maximum visual fidelity is most practical. The data indicates that High or Ultra at 1080p offers the best balance of image quality and performance, with Medium serving as a fallback for those who want to ensure frame rates stay above 144 FPS.

# FAQ

Q: How does this combo rank against all tested configurations in Fivem?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing ranks 878 out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the middle of the performance distribution for this game.

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 197.9 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The lowest is 32.6 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.

Q: At what resolution and settings does this combo exceed 100 FPS?

A: The combo exceeds 100 FPS at 1080p with Medium (159 FPS), High (128.9 FPS), and Low (197.9 FPS) settings, and at 1440p with Medium (105.3 FPS) and Low (130.7 FPS) settings.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data shows the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p High, the combo hits 128.9 FPS, but at 4K High it drops to 44.1 FPS, indicating the RX 6750 XT's resources are overwhelmed by increased pixel count while the i5-14400F has remaining headroom.

Q: What is the recommended setup for 4K gaming with this combo?

A: For 4K, Low settings (73.7 FPS) is the only option that provides smooth gameplay. Medium settings at 59.5 FPS is borderline playable, while High (44.1 FPS) and Ultra (32.6 FPS) are too slow for comfortable play.

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark performance compare to its rivals?

A: The i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32508, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-12800H (32513, 0 delta), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (32446, 0.2 delta), and AMD Ryzen 7 250 (32584, -0.2 delta).

# CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process. Its base clock runs at 2.50 GHz and boosts up to 4.70 GHz, with 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, giving system builders flexibility in platform choices. Its 65 W TDP suggests efficient power consumption for a desktop processor with this core count.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is to handle the game's simulation and networking logic, which is significant in a multiplayer environment. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 197.9 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's practical limit for this game given its single-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3093 and multi-core score of 21914 indicate strong per-thread performance, which is crucial for Fivem's often single-thread-heavy workloads.

The CPU's benchmark percentile of 88 against all processors is notably higher than the GPU's 79 percentile, suggesting the processor has more relative headroom. This is reflected in the measured FPS: at 1080p, the combo scales from 96.6 FPS at Ultra to 197.9 FPS at Low—a 105% increase—which implies the CPU can drive frame rates well above what the GPU delivers at higher settings. At 4K, however, the CPU's potential is untapped, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 197.9 FPS at Low, 159 FPS at Medium, 128.9 FPS at High, and 96.6 FPS at Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 101.3 FPS, representing a 51.2% drop. This scaling is steep but expected for a game with adjustable draw distances and post-processing.

At 2560x1440, the measured averages are 130.7 FPS at Low, 105.3 FPS at Medium, 84.1 FPS at High, and 62.2 FPS at Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra is 68.5 FPS (52.4%), similar to the 1080p pattern but with lower absolute values. Medium at 105.3 FPS is the first setting that dips below the 144 Hz threshold commonly sought by competitive players.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 73.7 FPS at Low, 59.5 FPS at Medium, 44.1 FPS at High, and 32.6 FPS at Ultra. The Low to Ultra drop is 41.1 FPS (55.8%), the largest percentage reduction across all resolutions. None of these settings reach 100 FPS, and only Low crosses the 60 FPS threshold.

Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: each step up in settings costs roughly 20-30 FPS, and each step up in resolution costs roughly 30-50% of the frame rate. The data indicates that the RX 6750 XT is most comfortable at 1080p, where it can handle Ultra at nearly 100 FPS, and increasingly struggles as pixel count and graphical complexity rise.