Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT pairing delivers a robust Fivem experience, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and presets. The data shows a system that is clearly capable of high refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and smooth gameplay at 1440p, while 4K remains a challenge best handled by lowering settings. This analysis breaks down the CPU and GPU contributions, answers common questions, and provides specific settings guidance based on the measured FPS data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename) using a 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, backed by a 32 MB shared L3 cache. In the context of Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification for Grand Theft Auto V, the CPU’s role is significant because the game engine is known to be sensitive to single-thread performance and frame pacing, especially in densely populated online servers.

Benchmark results show this CPU has a strong single-core presence, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3689. These figures are relevant because Fivem often relies on a single primary thread for game logic and simulation, meaning high single-core throughput directly translates to better minimum frame rates and reduced stutter. The 4.70 GHz boost clock helps in this regard, providing the raw frequency needed for quick response times in scenarios with many players and entities.

The multi-core performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and a Passmark multithread score of 25645. While Fivem may not use all 12 threads heavily, the 6 cores ensure that background tasks and the game’s auxiliary threads are handled without bottlenecking the primary rendering thread. This is important because in busy areas of the map, the game can spawn many AI characters and vehicles, which can increase CPU load across multiple threads.

Looking at the CPU’s standing relative to its peers, the data shows it is competitive. It holds an 83rd percentile rank against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the majority of processors on the market. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, has an average benchmark score of 32707, which is only 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 5 7400F’s score. This indicates that in synthetic benchmarks, the two are essentially equivalent, though the Ryzen’s higher boost clock may give it an edge in lightly threaded tasks like Fivem’s core loop.

The CPU is paired with a 65 W TDP, which is modest, and it supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is sufficient to feed the CPU’s cores, and the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures no bottleneck when communicating with the GPU. For Fivem specifically, the CPU’s ability to quickly process network data and player actions is crucial; the Passmark data encryption score of 16712 and data compression score of 289999 suggest it can handle the packet processing and streaming associated with multiplayer environments without issue.

In practical terms for Fivem, the Ryzen 5 7400F appears well-matched to the RX 6700 XT. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 191 FPS, which is high enough to suggest the CPU is not holding back the GPU in less demanding scenarios. Even at 1440p with High settings, the system reaches 79 FPS, indicating the CPU can keep up with the GPU’s output. The only potential CPU limitation might appear in the most extreme cases, such as 100+ player servers with heavy script activity, but the benchmark data does not indicate a systemic bottleneck.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, offering a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 2321 MHz, a game clock of 2424 MHz, and a boost clock of 2581 MHz. For Fivem, this memory configuration is particularly relevant because the game can consume significant VRAM when loading high-resolution textures and detailed environments, especially on servers with custom assets.

The 12 GB VRAM capacity is a key strength for this GPU in Fivem. At 4K resolution with Medium settings, the system shows an average of 55 FPS, suggesting the GPU can handle the resolution without running out of memory, which would otherwise cause severe stuttering or texture pop-in. The GPU’s 384.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture streaming is fast, which is critical in a game where the world is constantly loading new assets as players move around the map.

In terms of raw compute, the RX 6700 XT offers 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s. The GPU also has 40 ray tracing cores, though Fivem generally does not rely heavily on ray tracing, so the traditional raster performance is more important here. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19786 places it in the 72nd percentile against all GPUs, and its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, which has an average score of 27435, representing a 0% difference. This suggests the RX 6700 XT is competitive with that mobile part, though desktop GPUs often sustain their clocks better over time.

The GPU’s clock speeds are notably high, with a boost clock of 2581 MHz. This is beneficial for Fivem because the game’s frame rate can be unstable in certain areas, and having a high boost clock helps maintain higher average FPS in GPU-bound scenarios. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p with High settings, the system achieves 120 FPS, which indicates the GPU is well-utilized and performing as expected for its class. At 4K with Ultra settings, the average drops to 34 FPS, which is playable but not smooth, highlighting the GPU’s limits at the highest resolution and preset.

The GPU’s power draw is rated at 230 W, with a suggested power supply of 550 W. It uses a dual-slot cooler and requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. While these details do not directly affect FPS, they are relevant for system builders ensuring their power supply can handle the load. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support means it can take advantage of modern rendering features if the game or mods use them, though Fivem is primarily a DirectX 11 title. Overall, the RX 6700 XT provides a strong foundation for Fivem, with the VRAM capacity and clock speeds necessary for smooth gameplay at mainstream resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Fivem with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the sweet spot for high refresh rates, with average FPS ranging from 93 on Ultra to 191 on Low. At 2560x1440, the system still performs well, with averages between 62 on Ultra and 126 on Low. 4K is playable but requires lower settings, as the average FPS ranges from 34 on Ultra to 70 on Low.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 6700 XT have, and is it enough for Fivem?

A: The RX 6700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is sufficient for Fivem even at 4K resolution with Medium settings, where the system achieves 55 FPS. The VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor in the measured results.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7400F bottleneck the RX 6700 XT in Fivem?

A: The benchmark results indicate no significant bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo reaches 191 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate to suggest the CPU is keeping up with the GPU’s output. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072, supports this conclusion.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS on Low settings is 126, while on Ultra settings it drops to 62. This represents a significant performance hit of roughly half the frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest preset.

Q: Is this combo better in Fivem than a system with an Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The CPU data shows the Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750, which is only 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600T’s score of 32707. This indicates near-identical CPU performance, so any FPS difference in Fivem would likely be negligible.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K with High settings, the average FPS is 44, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. At 4K with Low settings, the average rises to 70 FPS, which is smoother. Ultra settings at 4K result in 34 FPS, which is below the threshold for comfortable gameplay.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the system is powerful enough to run High settings at 120 FPS, which is an excellent balance of visual quality and smoothness. If a player has a 144 Hz or higher refresh rate monitor, dropping to Medium settings yields 151 FPS, which is closer to the maximum refresh rate and provides a more responsive feel. Ultra settings at 1080p are still playable at 93 FPS, but the visual uplift from High to Ultra may not be worth the 22% performance drop.

For 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts. High settings provide 79 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay on most monitors. Medium settings increase this to 99 FPS, which is ideal for a 100 Hz monitor. Low settings at 1440p achieve 126 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play, but the visual quality may be too degraded for an immersive experience. Ultra settings at this resolution drop to 62 FPS, which is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding multiplayer scenarios where frame rates can dip.

At 3840x2160, the system is not well-suited for High or Ultra presets, with averages of 44 FPS and 34 FPS respectively. For 4K, the best experience is achieved with Low settings at 70 FPS or Medium settings at 55 FPS. The Medium preset is the recommended choice for 4K players who want a balance of detail and playability, as the data shows a minimum FPS of 47 in this configuration, indicating it stays mostly above the 45 FPS threshold for playable frame pacing. Low settings at 4K are the most competitive option, but the visual compromise is substantial.

The data suggests that the most balanced overall experience is at 2560x1440 with High settings. This preset delivers 79 FPS, which is smooth, while maintaining enough graphical fidelity to appreciate the game world. For users with high refresh rate 1080p monitors, Medium settings at 151 FPS is the best choice. For 4K users, Medium at 55 FPS is recommended over High at 44 FPS, as the latter is too close to the edge of playability.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ranks at position 1535 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the upper half of all system configurations tested, specifically in the 51st percentile. This ranking indicates that while this combo is not at the top tier of performance, it is solidly above average for this game. The rank reflects the system’s ability to handle Fivem’s demands across various settings and resolutions, with the measured data showing strong performance at 1080p and good performance at 1440p.

The ranking of 1535 out of 3005 suggests that there are many systems that perform better, likely those with higher-end GPUs like the RTX 3080 or RX 6800 XT, or CPUs with more cores and higher clocks. However, it also means that a significant number of tested combos perform worse. The combo’s position is a result of the balance between the Ryzen 5 7400F’s strong single-core performance and the RX 6700 XT’s solid rasterization capabilities. In Fivem, which is not the most demanding game in terms of GPU load, the CPU’s contribution is more pronounced, and the 7400F’s 4.70 GHz boost clock helps maintain high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios.

Compared to the GPU’s nearest rivals, the RX 6700 XT is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, which has a delta of 0%. This means that in synthetic benchmarks, they are equal, and the difference in Fivem would come down to driver optimization and thermal performance. The GPU also sits close to the RTX 3090, which has a delta of -0.5%, meaning the RX 6700 XT is only half a percent slower in average benchmark score. This is notable because the RTX 3090 is a much more expensive card, and the fact that the RX 6700 XT is nearly on par in this game speaks to the efficiency of the RDNA 2 architecture.

The combo’s rank of 1535 is respectable, but it is not a top-tier pairing for Fivem. For users seeking higher frame rates at 4K or maximum settings, a more powerful GPU would be necessary. However, for the vast majority of players using 1080p or 1440p monitors, this combo offers a compelling balance of performance and capability, as evidenced by the FPS data. The rank also indicates that the system is well-balanced, with neither the CPU nor the GPU being a clear bottleneck in the tested scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system shows its highest performance. With Low settings, the average FPS is 191, which is extremely high and indicates the system is CPU-bound at this point. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 151 FPS, with a minimum of 128 FPS and a maximum of 173 FPS. This shows good frame consistency, with the minimum being well above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings at 1080p yield an average of 120 FPS, which is still excellent for smooth gameplay. Ultra settings reduce the average to 93 FPS, which remains playable but represents a 22% drop from High settings.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings produce an average of 126 FPS, which is still high enough for a fast-paced experience. Medium settings average 99 FPS, with a minimum of 84 FPS and a maximum of 114 FPS. This is a well-optimized setting for 1440p, as the frame rate stays above 80 FPS even in demanding scenes. High settings at 1440p average 79 FPS, which is suitable for a 60-75 Hz monitor. Ultra settings drop to 62 FPS, which is playable but may experience occasional dips in busy areas of the map.

At 3840x2160, the system’s limits become apparent. Low settings average 70 FPS, which is smooth enough for 4K gaming, though the visual quality is significantly reduced. Medium settings average 55 FPS, with a minimum of 47 FPS and a maximum of 63 FPS. This is the most balanced 4K option, as the minimum frame rate stays above the 45 FPS threshold for acceptable playability. High settings at 4K average 44 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS target and may feel sluggish in fast-paced action. Ultra settings at 4K average 34 FPS, which is the lowest measured result and is not recommended for a smooth experience.

The data shows a clear pattern of diminishing returns as settings increase. At 1080p, the jump from High to Ultra costs 27 FPS (from 120 to 93). At 1440p, the same jump costs 17 FPS (from 79 to 62). At 4K, the jump from High to Ultra costs 10 FPS (from 44 to 34). This indicates that the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor at higher resolutions, and the visual quality improvements from High to Ultra are not worth the substantial frame rate penalty. For most users, the Medium or High presets provide the best balance of performance and visual quality, depending on resolution.