Fivem

# Fivem — AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

The measured frame rates for this pairing in Fivem reveal a system that is heavily GPU-limited at higher resolutions, yet transitions to a more balanced profile at 1080p. Across the full matrix of four settings presets and three resolutions, the combination produces average FPS ranging from 43.6 at 4K Ultra to 260.1 at 1080p Low. The RTX 3080 Ti's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are the dominant factors in this game's heavy draw-call and texture-loading workloads, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT's six Zen 3 cores provide sufficient throughput at lower pixel counts. The data indicates a performance curve that degrades predictably with resolution but shows unusual sensitivity to the preset ladder, particularly at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all settings, but the magnitude of the drop varies significantly with the preset. On Low settings, the average FPS falls from 260.1 at 1920x1080 to 168.6 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 91.5 FPS, and then to 95.5 at 3840x2160, another 73.1 FPS drop. This translates to a 63.3% decrease from 1080p to 4K on Low. On High settings, the drop is from 161.4 at 1080p to 109 at 1440p, then to 56.4 at 4K, representing a 65.1% total decline. The Ultra preset shows the most extreme scaling: 127.5 at 1080p, 83.1 at 1440p, and 43.6 at 4K — a 65.8% reduction from the lowest to highest resolution.

The consistency of these percentage drops — all clustering between 63% and 66% — indicates that the limiting component remains the same across the resolution range. The RTX 3080 Ti's pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s are being saturated, as the frame rate loss correlates almost perfectly with the increase in pixel count. However, the absolute FPS at 1080p (260.1 on Low) suggests the CPU is not entirely idle; the Ryzen 5 5600GT's 16 MB L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for feeding the GPU at lower resolutions but become less relevant as pixel count climbs. At 4K, the data shows the GPU is the unambiguous bottleneck, with even the Low preset unable to exceed 95.5 FPS.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the primary driver of these results, and its specifications align with the observed behavior. The GPU's 12 GB GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for Fivem's open-world multiplayer rendering where assets are streamed continuously. The memory clock of 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) and the base clock of 1365 MHz with a boost of 1665 MHz are the reference values; the benchmark data shows that at 4K Ultra, the frame rate of 43.6 is consistent with a GPU that is fully utilized. The GA102 chip with 10,240 shading units and 80 RT cores delivers 34.10 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, yet Fivem's draw call overhead appears to limit scaling beyond what the raw compute would suggest.

The GPU's role becomes more nuanced at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 260.1 FPS figure is likely capped by the CPU's single-thread performance, as the Ryzen 5 5600GT scores 913 in 3DMark single-thread and 2438 in Cinebench R23 single-core. The RTX 3080 Ti is capable of far higher frame rates in lighter titles, but Fivem's multiplayer server logic and entity updates place demands on the processor. The transition point is visible in the data: at 1440p Medium, the 132.9 FPS is still high enough to suggest GPU headroom, but the 4K results show the GPU hitting its practical limits. The 350 W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface are not constraining factors here; the bottleneck is the rendering pipeline itself.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows indicate that the Medium preset at 1440p offers the best compromise between visual fidelity and frame rate for this combo. At 2560x1440 Medium, the average FPS is 132.9, which is 49.8 FPS higher than High at the same resolution and only 35.7 FPS lower than Low. This places the system well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth multiplayer gameplay while retaining moderate visual quality. At 4K, the Medium preset's 71.5 FPS is playable, but the drop to High at 56.4 FPS and Ultra at 43.6 FPS suggests that High is only suitable for users prioritizing image quality over responsiveness.

For users targeting 1080p, the High preset at 161.4 FPS is the recommended choice, as it provides a 53.2 FPS improvement over Ultra while maintaining a frame rate that exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors. The Low preset at 1080p yields 260.1 FPS, but this comes at the cost of visual detail that is often unnecessary given the headroom. At 4K, the Low preset's 95.5 FPS is the only option that guarantees a responsive experience, but Medium at 71.5 FPS is a viable alternative for those with adaptive sync displays. The data does not support using Ultra at any resolution except for slow-paced exploration, as the 4K Ultra result of 43.6 FPS and 1080p Ultra of 127.5 FPS both represent significant performance sacrifices.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the full preset ladder yields a clear hierarchy: Low produces 260.1 FPS, Medium 206.7 FPS, High 161.4 FPS, and Ultra 127.5 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 53.4 FPS, while the step from Medium to High costs 45.3 FPS, and the step from High to Ultra costs 33.9 FPS. This diminishing loss pattern suggests that each higher preset adds progressively less rendering load, which is typical of games where texture quality and shadow resolution have nonlinear costs.

At 2560x1440, the values are 168.6 FPS (Low), 132.9 FPS (Medium), 109 FPS (High), and 83.1 FPS (Ultra). The gaps tighten: Low to Medium is 35.7 FPS, Medium to High is 23.9 FPS, and High to Ultra is 25.9 FPS. The 1440p results show a more balanced distribution, with the Ultra preset still maintaining a playable 83.1 FPS. At 3840x2160, the numbers compress further: Low 95.5 FPS, Medium 71.5 FPS, High 56.4 FPS, and Ultra 43.6 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only measured point below 60 FPS, and the spread from Low to Ultra is 51.9 FPS, which is narrower in absolute terms than at 1080p but proportionally larger.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ranks 514th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 71.3rd percentile of all configurations in the database. The rank reflects the GPU's strong position — the RTX 3080 Ti sits in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 41224, just 0.5% behind the RTX 3090's 41441 and 1.1% ahead of the RTX 5070's 41687 in the nearest rivals list. The CPU, by contrast, is in the 78th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 20740, nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-10700's 20746 and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X's 20680.

The rank of 514 out of 1792 indicates that while the GPU is top-tier, the CPU holds the combo back from the highest echelons. In Fivem specifically, the game's reliance on single-threaded performance is evident, as the Ryzen 5 5600GT's single-core scores are modest compared to its multi-core capabilities. The combination's rank is lower than what the GPU alone would suggest, implying that many higher-ranked combos pair similarly strong GPUs with CPUs that have superior single-thread performance. However, the 3080 Ti's 12 GB VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth ensure that this combo remains competitive, and the 514th position out of 1792 still places it well above the median for all tested systems.