Fivem

# Fivem with AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

This combination pairs AMD's 6-core Ryzen 5 5600GT with NVIDIA's RTX 4070 Ti, producing a system that ranks 232nd out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 13% of configurations. The measured frame rates across resolutions and presets reveal a platform that is consistently GPU-bound at higher settings, with the CPU's Zen 3 architecture providing sufficient headroom for the GPU to express its full capability in this multiplayer title.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT brings 6 cores and 12 threads, built on the Zen 3 architecture with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This processor sits in the 78th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20740. The 5600GT's nearest rivals in aggregate CPU performance include the Intel Core i7-10700 at 20746 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X at 20680 (0.3% delta), showing that this chip delivers competitive throughput within its segment.

In Fivem, the CPU's influence is most evident at lower resolutions and lower graphical presets. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 293.5 FPS, while at 1080p Ultra it drops to 146.4 FPS. This 147.1 FPS spread across settings at the same resolution indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at high frame rates, but the workload shifts toward the GPU as settings increase. The processor's 16 MB of L3 cache and 12 threads help maintain consistent frame delivery in a multiplayer environment where many entities and scripts are active.

The 5600GT's single-thread performance, reflected in a 3dmark single-thread score of 913 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2438, is particularly relevant for Fivem's game logic and network processing. Multiplayer titles often rely heavily on a few primary threads, and the 5600GT's boost clock of 4.60 GHz provides the per-core speed needed to prevent bottlenecks. The processor's multi-core scores, such as 17272 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 5554 in 3dmark max threads, demonstrate that background tasks and additional game threads have adequate resources.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the dominant component in this pairing, featuring 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Its Ada Lovelace architecture operates at a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with a memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The GPU holds an 85th percentile ranking versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44900, placing it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152, -0.6% delta) and Intel Arc A730M (45592, -1.5% delta) in aggregate performance.

Within Fivem, the RTX 4070 Ti's role becomes progressively more central as resolution and settings increase. At 4K Ultra, the system delivers 56 FPS, while at 4K Low it reaches 109.6 FPS — a 53.6 FPS difference that is almost entirely attributable to GPU workload scaling. The GPU's 7680 shading units and 240 TMUs provide substantial raw throughput, while its 80 ROPs handle pixel output across the 3840x2160 resolution. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for the game's texture and geometry demands at all tested presets, as evidenced by the consistent frame delivery without apparent memory-related stutters.

The GPU's compute capabilities, shown in its OpenCL score of 205028 and Vulkan score of 186784, indicate headroom for the rendering techniques Fivem employs. The RTX 4070 Ti's pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s correlate with the observed frame rates, particularly at 1440p and 4K where the GPU's fill rate becomes the limiting factor.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions. From 1080p to 1440p, High settings drop from 192.2 FPS to 128.4 FPS — a 33.2% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K, High settings further drop to 67.8 FPS — a 47.2% reduction. This escalating percentage drop indicates that the GPU becomes more dominant as pixel count rises, while the CPU's role diminishes.

At Low settings, the resolution scaling is steeper in absolute terms: 293.5 FPS at 1080p falls to 201.2 FPS at 1440p (31.4% drop), then to 109.6 FPS at 4K (45.5% drop). The fact that even at 4K Low the system maintains over 100 FPS suggests that the CPU is not a significant bottleneck even at lower graphical loads, since the frame rate remains high despite the increased pixel workload.

The scaling behavior indicates a balanced system where the CPU can sustain high frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU's workload limits performance at higher resolutions. At 1080p Ultra, the 146.4 FPS result versus 293.5 FPS at Low shows that graphical settings have a substantial impact, but the system never falls below playable thresholds. The 4K Ultra result of 56 FPS is the only measured point below 60 FPS, marking the boundary where this combination's GPU limitations become apparent.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination ranks 232nd out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 13% of all configurations tested. This ranking reflects the synergy between the 5600GT and RTX 4070 Ti, where the CPU's 78th percentile performance and the GPU's 85th percentile performance combine to produce a system that excels in this game.

Relative to other combinations, this pairing's rank suggests that the RTX 4070 Ti is the primary driver of performance in Fivem, as the GPU's percentile ranking is higher than the CPU's. The 5600GT's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-10700, has a nearly identical average CPU score (20746 vs 20740), and systems using that processor would likely perform similarly in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the RTX 4070 Ti's position among GPUs — near the RTX 5090 Mobile and ahead of the Radeon Pro 580 (44195, 1.6% delta) — indicates that this GPU tier delivers strong results in Fivem's rendering pipeline.

The rank of 232 out of 1792 means that 1560 other combinations perform worse in this game, which is a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The data suggests that the 5600GT does not hold back the RTX 4070 Ti in Fivem, as the system achieves high frame rates even at 1440p Ultra (97.3 FPS), indicating that the CPU can keep pace with the GPU's output demands.

Settings Recommendations

Analyzing the measured rows, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1080p, all presets deliver playable performance, with Low at 293.5 FPS, Medium at 243.2 FPS, High at 192.2 FPS, and Ultra at 146.4 FPS. For competitive play at 1080p, Medium or High provides a strong balance between visual quality and refresh rate headroom, as both exceed 190 FPS and leave room for monitor refresh rates up to 144Hz or 165Hz.

At 1440p, the Medium preset at 158.8 FPS offers the best combination of visual fidelity and frame rate, while High at 128.4 FPS remains viable for high-refresh displays. Ultra at 97.3 FPS is still playable and provides the highest visual quality, but the jump from Medium to Ultra costs 61.5 FPS. For users prioritizing smoothness at 1440p, Medium is the recommended preset based on the data.

At 4K, the choice becomes more constrained. High at 67.8 FPS and Medium at 90.1 FPS are both playable, while Ultra at 56 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for smooth gameplay. Low at 109.6 FPS offers high frame rates but sacrifices visual quality. The best experience at 4K per the measured rows is Medium, which provides 90.1 FPS while retaining moderate visual features. For those who insist on Ultra, the 56 FPS result is borderline, and dropping to High recovers 11.8 FPS with a modest visual reduction.

Overall, the data indicates that Medium settings at any resolution provide the most balanced experience, offering frame rates well above playability thresholds while maintaining reasonable visual quality. High settings at 1440p (128.4 FPS) and 1080p (192.2 FPS) are excellent choices for those prioritizing image quality over maximum frame rates.