Evolve

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the Intel Arc B570 occupies a specific position in the Evolve benchmark hierarchy. The data places this combination at rank 2294 out of 2872 tested combos, situating it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This percentile positioning is notable because the individual components do not align with this ranking when assessed in isolation. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 65th percentile among all graphics cards. The discrepancy between component-level percentiles and the combined in-game rank suggests that Evolve presents a workload profile where the GPU becomes the primary constraint, dragging the overall experience down relative to what the CPU alone might suggest. The measured frames per second across all resolutions and settings confirm this interpretation, as the Arc B570 consistently delivers moderate frame rates that never approach the high refresh rate territory. The ranking implies that this combo is better suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings rather than pushing higher resolutions or maximum quality presets.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 brings a specific set of specifications to this Evolve benchmark. The GPU features 10 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds are fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, with memory operating at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The memory configuration is particularly relevant for Evolve, a game from 2015 that was designed for the hardware of that era. The 10 GB frame buffer is generous for this title, and benchmark results indicate that memory capacity is not the limiting factor. Instead, the raw compute throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 and the 2304 shading units become the binding constraint when resolution and settings increase.

The GPU's benchmark scores provide context for its behavior in Evolve. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 illustrate the card's overall capability. When compared to its nearest rivals, the Arc B570 sits within a narrow performance band. The data shows the card is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% behind the Intel Arc A750, with the AMD Radeon R9 M390X trailing by 0.5%. This tight clustering suggests that the Arc B570's performance in Evolve is representative of its class rather than exceptional. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 11 score of 118 and DirectX 12 score of 72 are particularly telling, as Evolve from 2015 likely relies on DirectX 11 rendering paths, which may not fully utilize the architecture's newer features.

The relationship between VRAM and Evolve's requirements becomes clearer when examining the measured FPS data. At 4K Ultra settings, the combo manages only 22 FPS, while dropping to Low settings at 4K raises this to 52 FPS. This 30 FPS swing demonstrates that the GPU is heavily taxed by Evolve's rendering workload at high resolutions, regardless of texture memory needs. The 10 GB VRAM allocation is never the bottleneck; instead, the pixel fill rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s determine the outcome. The fixed 2500 MHz clock means the card operates at a constant pace, and the benchmark data reflects this consistency across different test scenarios.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals how this combo scales across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 137 FPS, which drops to 92 FPS at 2560x1440 and further to 52 FPS at 3840x2160. This progression shows a 45 FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p, followed by a 40 FPS drop from 1440p to 4K. The scaling pattern is not linear, indicating that the GPU becomes increasingly saturated as pixel count rises. The 1080p to 1440p transition represents a 32.8% reduction in frame rate, while the 1440p to 4K transition shows a 43.5% reduction. This accelerating decline points to the GPU being the limiting component at higher resolutions, with the CPU capable of feeding frames faster than the Arc B570 can render them.

The Medium settings data provides additional insight into the scaling behavior. At 1080p Medium, the combo hits 106 FPS average with a minimum of 90 and maximum of 122 FPS. Moving to 1440p Medium drops the average to 71 FPS with a 60-82 FPS range, and 4K Medium falls to 40 FPS with a 34-47 FPS range. The consistency of the frame pacing, as evidenced by the relatively tight min-max ranges, suggests that the GPU maintains stable performance without sudden spikes or crashes. The High settings curve follows a similar trajectory: 83 FPS at 1080p, 56 FPS at 1440p, and 32 FPS at 4K. This represents a 51 FPS difference between 1080p and 4K, highlighting how demanding Evolve becomes at maximum resolution.

This scaling analysis indicates that the system is GPU-limited throughout the resolution range. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar frame rates across resolutions at the same settings, since the CPU workload does not change with resolution. Instead, the data shows consistent drops as resolution increases, confirming that the Arc B570 is the binding constraint. The 137 FPS at 1080p Low represents the ceiling for this combo, and even this figure is modest compared to what high-end systems achieve in competitive FPS titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall ranking of this combo in Evolve?

A: The combo ranks 2294 out of 2872 tested combinations, placing it in the 20th percentile of all tested systems. The CPU alone sits at the 91st percentile, while the GPU holds the 65th percentile, indicating the GPU drags down the combined score.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its closest competitors?

A: The Arc B570 is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% behind the Intel Arc A750. It is also 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X, showing a very tight performance cluster.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Evolve?

A: The data shows 1080p is the only resolution where the combo achieves consistently playable frame rates. At 1080p Medium, the average is 106 FPS, while even 1080p Ultra manages 58 FPS. At 1440p, only Low settings exceed 90 FPS, and at 4K, the maximum achieved is 52 FPS on Low.

Q: Is the 10 GB VRAM sufficient for Evolve?

A: Yes, the 10 GB GDDR6 memory is more than adequate for this 2015 title. The performance drops at higher resolutions are attributable to compute throughput, not memory capacity. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth and 160-bit bus provide sufficient data throughput for Evolve's textures.

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark performance influence gaming results?

A: The Core i7-14700F scores 35122 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4958 in single-core, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 41317. These strong results suggest the CPU is not limiting the combo, as frame rates scale inversely with resolution, which is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: What settings provide the best experience at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings deliver 92 FPS, while Medium drops to 71 FPS. High settings yield 56 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. The data suggests Medium at 1440p offers a balanced 71 FPS average with a 60 FPS minimum, which is playable for most users.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F brings substantial processing power to this combo. With 20 cores and 28 threads, the CPU provides ample parallelism for Evolve's game logic and physics calculations. The base clock of 2.10 GHz boosts up to 5.40 GHz, offering high single-thread performance when needed. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps reduce memory latency during gameplay. The CPU's benchmark scores are impressive: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 35122, while single-core hits 4958. Geekbench results show 19620 multi-core and 2429 single-core, and PassMark multi-thread scores 41317.

The CPU's role in Evolve becomes apparent when analyzing the frame rate data across different resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 137 FPS, which is a solid result for a game from 2015. This frame rate suggests the CPU can feed the GPU with enough draw calls to maintain high performance at lower resolutions. The single-thread score of 4257 in PassMark single-thread and 499 in Cinebench R15 single-core indicate strong per-core performance, which is crucial for games that rely on a primary game thread. The 65 W TDP is modest for a 20-core processor, and the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture on the 10 nm Intel process delivers efficient performance.

The CPU's benchmark positioning relative to rivals shows it is competitive with high-end options. It trails the Intel Xeon 6505P by 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6%, while leading the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3% and the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.8%. This narrow gap indicates the i7-14700F is a capable gaming processor, even if it does not lead the pack. The 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its strength, and the data suggests that in Evolve, the CPU is never the limiting factor. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (137 FPS) and 1080p Medium (106 FPS) are likely near the CPU's maximum frame delivery capability for this game, but the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions mask any CPU headroom that might exist.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the combo offers a wide range of options. Low settings deliver 137 FPS, which is ideal for high refresh rate displays, while Medium provides 106 FPS with a 90 FPS minimum, ensuring smooth gameplay without sacrificing too much visual quality. High settings at 1080p yield 83 FPS, and Ultra drops to 58 FPS. For competitive play, Low or Medium at 1080p is recommended, as the 90 FPS minimum at Medium guarantees no dips below playable thresholds. For a more visually rich experience, High at 1080p offers 83 FPS, which remains above the 60 FPS threshold for most displays.

At 2560x1440, the choices become more constrained. Low settings achieve 92 FPS, which is playable, but Medium drops to 71 FPS with a 60 FPS minimum, making it the highest preset that maintains a 60 FPS floor. High settings at 1440p yield 56 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. The data suggests that 1440p Medium is the sweet spot for this resolution, balancing visual quality with fluid motion. Pushing to High at 1440p sacrifices smoothness for minor graphical gains, which may not be worth the 15 FPS loss from Medium.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings achieve 52 FPS, which is borderline playable, but Medium drops to 40 FPS with a 34 FPS minimum, and High falls to 32 FPS. Ultra at 4K is not viable at 22 FPS. For 4K gaming, Low settings are the only option that approaches 60 FPS, and even then, the 52 FPS average may feel less responsive than desired. The data indicates that this combo is not well-suited for 4K gaming in Evolve, and users should either lower resolution to 1440p or accept a significant frame rate penalty at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of this combo's performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low settings produce 137 FPS average, Medium produces 106 FPS average with a range of 90 to 122 FPS, High produces 83 FPS average, and Ultra produces 58 FPS average. This shows a clear progression where each settings tier costs roughly 20-30 FPS, with the gap between Low and Ultra being 79 FPS. The Medium settings data demonstrates consistent frame pacing, with the minimum only 16 FPS below the average and the maximum 16 FPS above, indicating stable performance without major stutters.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are predictably lower. Low settings achieve 92 FPS average, Medium achieves 71 FPS average with a 60-82 FPS range, High achieves 56 FPS average, and Ultra achieves 39 FPS average. The Medium settings range shows a 22 FPS spread between minimum and maximum, which is slightly wider than at 1080p but still indicates reasonable stability. The step from Low to Medium costs 21 FPS, while Medium to High costs 15 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 17 FPS. This non-uniform scaling suggests that certain settings have a disproportionate impact on performance at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low settings deliver 52 FPS average, Medium delivers 40 FPS average with a 34-47 FPS range, High delivers 32 FPS average, and Ultra delivers 22 FPS average. The Medium settings range spans 13 FPS, which is the tightest of any resolution, indicating that the GPU is heavily loaded and frame times are consistent. The difference between Low and Ultra is 30 FPS, which is the largest spread across all resolutions. This confirms that 4K gaming requires the lowest settings to achieve acceptable performance, and even then, the 52 FPS at Low may not be sufficient for fast-paced FPS gameplay. The data shows a clear pattern: this combo performs best at 1080p, is acceptable at 1440p with reduced settings, and struggles at 4K regardless of settings.