Evolve

Evolve

AVERAGE FPS
81
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 81 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 42 52 64
1440p QHD 49 67 89 111
1080p Full HD 71 103 130 166

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 64
3840x2160 Medium 52
3840x2160 High 42
3840x2160 Ultra 28
2560x1440 Low 111
2560x1440 Medium 89
2560x1440 High 67
2560x1440 Ultra 49
1920x1080 Low 166
1920x1080 Medium 130
1920x1080 High 103
1920x1080 Ultra 71

Evolve with Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, In-Depth Analysis

# Evolve with Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT presents a compelling mid-range configuration for Evolve, a 2015 FPS title. Measured results across three resolutions and four settings presets show a system that comfortably handles 1080p and 1440p gaming, but struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K Ultra. The data reveals a clear bottleneck shift as resolution increases, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor at higher pixel counts while the 20-core, 28-thread CPU remains largely underutilized.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and tells a clear story about component balance. At High settings, average frame rates fall from 102.7 FPS at 1920x1080 to 67.1 FPS at 2560x1440, then plummet to 42.2 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 59% reduction from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the RX 6650 XT's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus are being heavily taxed at higher resolutions. The pattern is consistent across all presets: Low settings drop from 165.5 FPS at 1080p to 63.6 FPS at 4K, Medium falls from 129.9 to 52, and Ultra degrades from 70.6 to 28.

Notably, the scaling between 1080p and 1440p is less severe than between 1440p and 4K. At High settings, the 1440p result (67.1 FPS) is only 35% lower than 1080p, while 4K is 37% lower than 1440p. This nonlinear degradation suggests the GPU's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth become progressively more strained as resolution climbs. The 280.3 GB/s bandwidth and 168.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are evidently sufficient for 1080p but insufficient for 4K Ultra, where the system falls to just 28 FPS — a 60% drop from the already-challenging 70.6 FPS at 1080p Ultra.

The data implies that for this combo, 1080p is the sweet spot where the GPU can stretch its legs, while 4K represents a workload that exceeds the card's designed capacity. The 176 W TDP and 2048 shading units suggest a card built for 1080p performance, and the measured numbers confirm this.

Settings Recommendations

Examining the measured rows, the most balanced experience appears at 1440p Medium, delivering 89.4 FPS — a frame rate that remains fluid while offering improved visual fidelity over Low settings. At 1080p, Medium (129.9 FPS) provides an excellent experience, but High (102.7 FPS) is nearly as smooth while presumably offering better visuals. The jump from Medium to High costs roughly 22% performance at both 1080p and 1440p, while High to Ultra costs even more: 45% at 1080p (102.7 to 70.6) and 37% at 1440p (67.1 to 49).

For users targeting 60 FPS as a baseline, 1080p High and 1440p Medium are the highest settings that comfortably exceed this threshold. At 4K, only Low (63.6 FPS) achieves playable frame rates; Medium (52 FPS) and High (42.2 FPS) fall short, with Ultra (28 FPS) being entirely unsuitable. The 4K Low result is surprisingly strong — only 8% lower than 1440p Medium — suggesting that Evolve's Low preset is not extremely demanding, but the card's memory bandwidth becomes a wall beyond this point.

The optimal balance for this combo is 1080p High: it delivers 102.7 FPS, which is 73% faster than the 4K High result and only 19% slower than 1080p Ultra's 70.6 FPS. Given the diminishing returns of Ultra settings, High appears to be the pragmatic ceiling for this hardware.

FAQ

Q: Can this combination run Evolve at 4K?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings, where it averages 63.6 FPS. Medium drops to 52 FPS, High to 42.2, and Ultra becomes unplayable at 28 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The data shows 1080p as the strongest resolution, with Low hitting 165.5 FPS and High reaching 102.7 FPS. 1440p is also viable, with Medium at 89.4 FPS, but 4K requires significant compromises.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings?

A: The average frame rate drops from 102.7 FPS to 67.1 FPS, a 35% reduction. This indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the CPU's 20 cores are unlikely to be stressed by Evolve's workload.

Q: Is the RX 6650 XT's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Evolve?

A: Based on the measured data, yes. The card has 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 280.3 GB/s bandwidth, and even at 4K Ultra (28 FPS), the game runs without reported issues — though the low frame rate suggests compute limitations rather than memory capacity problems.

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations?

A: It ranks 1080th out of 1695 tested combos for Evolve, placing it in the 36th percentile. This suggests it outperforms roughly 36% of tested systems while being beaten by the majority.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p Ultra?

A: The measured average is 70.6 FPS. This is playable but notably lower than the 102.7 FPS at High settings, indicating Ultra presets carry a significant performance penalty.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame places this configuration at 1080 out of 1695 tested combos for Evolve. This mid-pack ranking is somewhat surprising given the CPU's strength — the i7-14700F sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs and outperforms rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X by 0.6% in average benchmark score. The ranking suggests that Evolve is not a CPU-intensive title, and the GPU becomes the determining factor.

The RX 6650 XT itself ranks in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29024. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, is essentially tied at 29011 (0% delta), while the RX 470 is 0.1% behind. These close margins indicate that the GPU is performing exactly as expected, neither over- nor under-delivering.

Given that the CPU is far more powerful than the GPU relative to their respective peer groups, the combo's rank is likely driven by the GPU's ceiling. Users seeking higher rankings would need a more capable graphics card, as the CPU has ample headroom. The data implies that in Evolve, this combo behaves like a GPU-limited system where the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and 33 MB L3 cache are rarely, if ever, the limiting factor.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a 7 nm process, is the clear performance limiter in this configuration. Its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves adequate for 1080p and 1440p but insufficient for 4K. The card's boost clock of 2635 MHz and game clock of 2410 MHz drive 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, yielding 10.79 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

The measured results show the GPU's scaling behavior: at 1080p Low, the card produces 165.5 FPS, but this drops to 70.6 FPS at Ultra — a 57% reduction. This large spread indicates that Evolve's Ultra settings significantly increase pixel and texture workload, likely stressing the memory subsystem. The 4K results amplify this: 63.6 FPS at Low drops to 28 FPS at Ultra, showing that the card's 168.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 337.3 GTexel/s texture rate are overwhelmed at high resolutions.

The GPU's 32 ray accelerators and DirectX 12 Ultimate support are present, but Evolve's 2015 release date means these features are unlikely to be utilized. The card's 72nd percentile ranking, with its nearest rival (RX 6800M) matching its average score exactly, confirms that it performs as expected for its class. The 176 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU indicate a mid-range power profile, consistent with its 1080p-focused design.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 165.5 FPS on Low, 129.9 FPS on Medium, 102.7 FPS on High, and 70.6 FPS on Ultra. These results show a steady, predictable decline as settings increase, with each preset step costing roughly 20-30 FPS. The 1080p Low result is particularly notable, exceeding 165 FPS and demonstrating that the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently in less demanding scenarios.

Moving to 2560x1440, the numbers become 111 FPS (Low), 89.4 FPS (Medium), 67.1 FPS (High), and 49 FPS (Ultra). The drop from 1080p is significant: Low loses 33% of its performance, Medium loses 31%, High loses 35%, and Ultra loses 31%. This consistent ~33% reduction across presets indicates a resolution-driven bottleneck rather than a settings-specific one.

At 3840x2160, the results are 63.6 FPS (Low), 52 FPS (Medium), 42.2 FPS (High), and 28 FPS (Ultra). The 4K Low result is the only playable option, while Ultra falls below 30 FPS, making it unusable for smooth gameplay. The gap between 1440p and 4K is severe: Low drops 43%, Medium drops 42%, High drops 37%, and Ultra drops 43%. This consistent ~42% reduction confirms that the GPU's memory bandwidth and pixel throughput are the limiting factors at 4K.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F, with its 20 cores (likely a mix of performance and efficiency cores given the 28 threads), 2.10 GHz base clock, and 5.40 GHz boost clock, is a formidable processor that ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35443 and single-core score of 5003 place it in elite territory, but Evolve's measured frame rates suggest the CPU is rarely the bottleneck.

The fact that frame rates scale dramatically with resolution — from 165.5 FPS at 1080p Low to 28 FPS at 4K Ultra — indicates that the GPU is saturated while the CPU sits idle. If the CPU were limiting, we would expect similar frame rates across resolutions, but the data shows a 5.9x difference between the best and worst cases. The CPU's 33 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample data for game logic, but Evolve's 2015 engine likely cannot utilize all 20 cores effectively.

The i7-14700F's nearest rivals confirm its strength: it trails the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X by only 0.6% and the Ryzen 9 9900X3D by 1.1%, while leading the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 1.2% and the AMD EPYC 7313P by 1.7%. These tight margins suggest that the CPU delivers flagship-level compute performance, but in Evolve, this power is largely untapped. The 65 W TDP and 10 nm process node indicate efficiency, but the game's requirements are too low to stress this processor meaningfully.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-14700F

Cores / Threads 20 / 28
Base Clock 2100 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2635 MHz MHz
TDP 176 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in Evolve

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 63.6
3840x2160 Medium 52.0
3840x2160 High 42.2
3840x2160 Ultra 28.0
2560x1440 Low 111.0
2560x1440 Medium 89.4
2560x1440 High 67.1
2560x1440 Ultra 49.0
1920x1080 Low 165.5
1920x1080 Medium 129.9
1920x1080 High 102.7
1920x1080 Ultra 70.6

Evolve with ii7-14700F + Other GPUs

See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Evolve with RX 6650 XT + Other CPUs

See how Evolve performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-14700F + RX 6650 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.