Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the Intel Arc B370 presents a unique combination in the Evolve benchmark database, primarily due to the GPU being an integrated part of a mobile platform. The data shows a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics solution, particularly at higher resolutions, yet still offers a playable experience at 1080p with adjusted settings. This analysis breaks down the measured performance metrics to understand the balance between the CPU and GPU in this specific title.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance cliff as resolution increases, which is a classic indicator of GPU-bound rendering. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 80 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same Low settings, the average drops to 54 FPS, a reduction of 32.5%. The jump to 3840x2160 at Low settings yields only 31 FPS, representing a further 42.6% drop from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern shows that the Intel Arc B370’s rendering pipeline becomes the limiting factor well before the CPU’s processing capabilities are exhausted.

The trend is consistent across all settings presets. For example, at Medium settings, the average FPS falls from 62 at 1080p to 42 at 1440p, and then to 24 at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 1440p is 20 FPS, while the gap between 1440p and 4K is 18 FPS. This consistent degradation suggests that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth—both of which are system-dependent for this integrated part—cannot keep pace with the increasing pixel count. The data indicates that the Ryzen 7 3700X is not the bottleneck here; if it were, we would expect to see a more moderate decline in frame rates as resolution increases, with the CPU becoming the constraint at lower resolutions.

At 4K, the system is clearly overwhelmed. The High preset averages only 19 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 13 FPS. These numbers are below the threshold for smooth, interactive gameplay. The Low preset at 4K, at 31 FPS, is the only configuration at this resolution that approaches a playable state, but it still falls short of the 60 FPS target that many users consider ideal. The scaling data strongly suggests that users should treat 1080p as the primary target resolution for this hardware combination, with 1440p being a viable option only for less demanding presets.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database for Evolve, this specific CPU-GPU pairing holds a combo rank of 2639 out of 2872 tested combinations. This places it in the bottom 8.1% of all systems tested. This is a low rank, reflecting the fact that the Intel Arc B370 is a highly power-efficient integrated GPU designed for portability rather than high-end gaming performance. The GPU’s percentile ranking against all other GPUs is 5, meaning it outperforms only 5% of the database’s entries.

The CPU, however, is a much stronger component. The Ryzen 7 3700X sits in the 84th percentile against all CPUs, indicating that its processing power is well above average. This creates a significant mismatch. The combo’s low rank is primarily a consequence of the GPU’s limitations, not the CPU’s. The data shows a system where a capable 8-core processor is paired with a graphics solution that is in the bottom tier of performance, resulting in an overall experience that is far below what the CPU alone could support. The rank of 2639 out of 2872 is a stark indicator that this is not a combination built for demanding gaming scenarios, particularly in a fast-paced FPS like Evolve.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is a critical component in this analysis, as its specifications directly explain the measured performance. It is built on the Xe3-LPG architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process, which speaks to its efficiency focus. However, its performance envelope is limited by its design. The GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units. These are modest numbers that cap the theoretical pixel and texture throughput at 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s, respectively. The FP32 performance is rated at 6.144 TFLOPS, which is low compared to dedicated desktop graphics cards.

The most significant factor is the memory configuration: the Arc B370 uses System Shared memory. This means it has no dedicated VRAM and relies on the system’s DDR4 memory for all graphics data, with bandwidth being system-dependent. In this configuration, the memory bandwidth is likely a major bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions where the demand for texture data increases. The GPU’s benchmark score in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test is 1184, which places it in the 5th percentile. Its nearest rivals are legacy parts like the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770, with deltaPct values of -0.2% and -0.5%, respectively. This indicates that the Arc B370’s performance is comparable to GPUs from a much older generation. The boost clock of 2400 MHz is decent, but it cannot compensate for the low core count and shared memory bandwidth. The data is clear: the GPU is the sole reason for this combo’s low frame rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Evolve with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The measured data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo consistently achieves playable frame rates. At 1080p, even the Ultra preset averages 34 FPS, while Low averages 80 FPS. At 1440p, the best average is 54 FPS on Low, and at 4K, the best average is 31 FPS on Low.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its closest rivals?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the Arc B370 scored 1184. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scored 1186, which is a deltaPct of -0.2%. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scored 1190, with a deltaPct of -0.5%. This means the Arc B370 is essentially on par with these older GPUs in this specific test.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X a bottleneck for the Intel Arc B370 in Evolve?

A: No, the data suggests the opposite. The CPU is in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 5th percentile. The sharp drop in FPS as resolution increases indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU has ample headroom, as evidenced by its high benchmark scores, but it is not being fully utilized due to the GPU’s constraints.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 80 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 34 FPS. This is a difference of 46 FPS, or a 57.5% reduction in performance when moving from the lowest to the highest quality preset.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Evolve?

A: The data indicates no. At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS is 31 on the Low preset. The Medium preset averages 24 FPS, High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra averages 13 FPS. These frame rates are too low for a responsive FPS experience.

Q: What is the RAM configuration for the Intel Arc B370?

A: The GPU uses System Shared memory. This means it has no dedicated VRAM and its memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," relying entirely on the host system’s DDR4 memory.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is a high-performance desktop processor from the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Matisse. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This is a 65W TDP part, indicating good efficiency for its performance class. The CPU’s benchmark results confirm its strength: it scores 2092 in Cinebench R15 multicore, 8899 in Geekbench multicore, and 22458 in Passmark multithread. Its average benchmark score is 34260, which puts it in the 84th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the Intel Core i5-13450HX, with deltaPct values of 0.1% and -0.2%, respectively. This shows the 3700X is competitive with much newer processors.

In the context of Evolve, the CPU’s 16 threads provide more than enough processing power for the game’s logic and physics. Given the low frame rates caused by the GPU, the CPU is likely idle for a significant portion of the time. For instance, at 1080p Low, the GPU is producing 80 FPS, but the CPU could likely handle more. The game’s release date of 2015 means it is a title from the previous console generation, and its CPU demands are not exceptionally high by modern standards. The Ryzen 7 3700X’s performance in Passmark physics (1181) and integer math (66399) indicates strong computational throughput that is more than adequate for this game. The data shows a clear imbalance: a top-tier CPU from its generation is paired with a bottom-tier GPU, and the CPU’s potential is largely unrealized in this configuration.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user’s target resolution and desired frame rate. For a smooth 60+ FPS experience, the only viable option is 1920x1080 with the Low preset, which achieves an average of 80 FPS. This is the only setting that provides a significant buffer above the 60 FPS mark. If the user can tolerate slightly lower frame rates, the Medium preset at 1080p averages 62 FPS, which is still within a playable range and offers better visual quality. The High preset at 1080p drops to 49 FPS, which may be acceptable for some, but the jump from Medium to High comes at a 13 FPS cost.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only one that delivers a playable average, at 54 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 42 FPS, which is playable but may feel less responsive. The High and Ultra presets at 1440p, at 33 FPS and 23 FPS respectively, are not recommended for an FPS title. For 4K, none of the presets are suitable for competitive play. The Low preset’s 31 FPS is the only one above 30 FPS, but it is still not ideal. The recommendation is to prioritize 1080p Medium for a balance of visual fidelity and performance, or 1080p Low for maximum frame rate. Users should avoid Ultra settings at any resolution, as the performance cost is substantial, with the Ultra preset at 1080p being only 34 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following data is taken directly from the measured FPS records for this combo. All values are average FPS unless otherwise noted.

1920x1080:

• Low: 80 FPS
• Medium: 62 FPS (min 53, max 72)
• High: 49 FPS
• Ultra: 34 FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 54 FPS
• Medium: 42 FPS (min 35, max 48)
• High: 33 FPS
• Ultra: 23 FPS

3840x2160:

• Low: 31 FPS
• Medium: 24 FPS (min 20, max 27)
• High: 19 FPS
• Ultra: 13 FPS

The data shows a linear progression of performance degradation as settings increase. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 46 FPS. At 1440p, the difference is 31 FPS, and at 4K, it is 18 FPS. This narrowing gap at higher resolutions further confirms that the GPU is completely saturated, and reducing settings has diminishing returns as the pixel count becomes the dominant bottleneck. The min and max FPS data for the Medium preset shows a variance of 19 FPS at 1080p, 13 FPS at 1440p, and 7 FPS at 4K, indicating that frame pacing becomes more consistent as the GPU becomes more constrained.