Doom

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT combination delivers a top-tier experience in Doom, placing in the 1158th position out of 3712 tested combos. This ranking puts the pairing in the upper third of all systems, demonstrating that this hardware configuration is exceptionally well-suited for the game’s fast-paced action. The combination of a high-end 8-core CPU and a powerful RDNA 2 GPU ensures that the game runs smoothly across all settings, with performance that scales predictably. The data confirms that this is a robust platform for Doom, offering headroom for high refresh rate displays at lower resolutions and maintaining playable frame rates even at 4K with maximum settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame of 1158 out of 3712 places this system firmly in the top 31% of all tested configurations for Doom. This is a strong result, indicating that the synergy between the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is excellent for this title. The rank suggests that the system is not bottlenecked in a significant way, allowing both the CPU and GPU to contribute effectively to the final frame rates. While it is not in the top 1% of all systems, this is an elite performance tier for a high-refresh-rate gaming experience.

The CPU’s performance, as measured by its average benchmark score of 35909, is highly competitive. It sits just 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and 0.7% above the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, showing that its processing power is well within the range of other top-tier chips. This level of CPU performance is more than sufficient to feed the GPU in Doom, ensuring that the graphics card is the primary driver of frame rates. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 48477 places it 1.5% above the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, though it trails the Intel Arc A550M by 2.5%. Despite this, the combination’s overall rank shows that in this specific game, the pairing works exceptionally well.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is the dominant component in this pairing for Doom, equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This substantial memory allocation is a key asset, as it allows the GPU to handle the game’s textures and assets at high resolutions without running into memory capacity limits. The GPU’s high memory bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the processing cores quickly, which is crucial for maintaining high frame rates in a fast-paced FPS like Doom.

Clock speeds are another critical factor; the GPU operates at a base clock of 1825 MHz, a game clock of 2015 MHz, and a boost clock of 2250 MHz. The high boost clock allows the card to push performance when thermal and power headroom permit, directly translating to higher frame rates in-game. With a pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 648.0 GTexel/s, the card has immense raw fill rate capabilities. This is reflected in the benchmark results: at 1080p Ultra settings, the combo achieves 176 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU has plenty of compute power to spare. Its FP32 performance of 20.74 TFLOPS underscores its ability to handle the complex shaders and lighting effects in Doom, ensuring that visual fidelity does not come at the cost of playability.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows clear scaling across resolutions, indicating where the bottleneck shifts between the CPU and GPU. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 292 FPS, which drops to 189 FPS at 1440p and further to 102 FPS at 4K. This pattern suggests that at lower resolutions and settings, the CPU is capable of pushing very high frame rates, but the load on the GPU increases substantially as resolution rises.

The transition from 1080p to 1440p at High settings shows a drop from 215 FPS to 139 FPS, a reduction of 35%. This significant decrease indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary limiting factor as the pixel count increases. Moving from 1440p to 4K at High settings sees a further drop to 75 FPS, another 46% reduction. This scaling is typical for a game like Doom, where the GPU’s rendering load scales directly with the number of pixels. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU is heavily utilized, while at 1080p, the system is more balanced, with the CPU able to keep up with the GPU’s output. The presence of a 16 GB frame buffer ensures that even at 4K, there is no memory-related stuttering, and the performance drop is purely due to the computational demands of the higher resolution.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset emerges as the optimal choice across all tested resolutions. The data shows that at 1080p Medium, the system delivers 254 FPS, which is only a 13% reduction from the Low preset’s 292 FPS but offers significantly better visual fidelity. At 1440p, Medium provides 165 FPS, comfortably above the 144 Hz refresh rate commonly found on high-end monitors, while still providing a substantial visual upgrade over Low. Even at 4K, the Medium preset maintains an average of 89 FPS, which is perfectly playable and much smoother than the 62 FPS seen at Ultra.

The Ultra preset, while visually impressive, comes at a high performance cost. At 4K, it drops to 62 FPS, which may be below the threshold for a competitive or high-refresh-rate experience. At 1440p, Ultra achieves 114 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 31% drop from Medium. The High preset sits between Medium and Ultra, providing 215 FPS at 1080p and 139 FPS at 1440p, but it is the Medium preset that offers the most consistent high-frame-rate experience across all resolutions without sacrificing too much visual quality. For players with high refresh rate monitors, Medium at 1440p is the clear recommendation, while those on 4K displays should choose Medium to ensure the frame rate stays above 85 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates exceptional performance across all settings. The Low preset yields an average of 292 FPS, which is a maximum for this resolution. The Medium preset delivers 254 FPS, with a minimum of 216 FPS and a maximum of 292 FPS, showing a tight frame time distribution. The High preset produces 215 FPS, while the Ultra preset is still remarkably fast at 176 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is never CPU-bound, and the GPU has ample headroom to maximize refresh rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains very high. Low settings produce 189 FPS, and Medium settings average 165 FPS, with a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 189 FPS. High settings drop to 139 FPS, which is still ideal for 144 Hz displays. Ultra settings at 1440p yield 114 FPS, providing a smooth experience for high-refresh-rate gaming. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 35% drop at High settings, indicating the GPU is taking on more work but still performing admirably.

At 3840x2160, the system’s limits are more apparent. Low settings achieve 102 FPS, which is very good for 4K gaming. Medium settings deliver 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 FPS and a maximum of 103 FPS, ensuring a stable experience. High settings drop to 75 FPS, which is still playable. Ultra settings bring the average down to 62 FPS, which is on the edge of smoothness for some players. The data shows that this combination can handle 4K gaming, but users seeking consistently high frame rates should stick to Medium or lower settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Doom?

A: The sweet spot is 2560x1440. At Medium settings, the system delivers 165 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. It also allows for High settings at 139 FPS, providing a great balance of visual quality and speed.

Q: Can this system run Doom at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes, but just barely. At 4K Ultra settings, the average FPS is 62. While this is technically playable, it may not be smooth enough for competitive play. Dropping to Medium settings at 4K raises the average to 89 FPS, which is a more comfortable experience.

Q: How much faster is the Low preset compared to Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the Low preset averages 292 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 176 FPS. This represents a 66% performance increase for Low, but the Ultra preset still provides a very high frame rate.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in this system for Doom?

A: At 1080p, the system is well-balanced, but the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases. The drop from 292 FPS at 1080p Low to 102 FPS at 4K Low indicates that the GPU’s rendering load is scaling with resolution, while the CPU has enough power to keep up.

Q: How does the 16 GB VRAM affect performance at 4K?

A: The 16 GB frame buffer ensures that there are no memory-related performance drops at 4K. The bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s is sufficient to feed the GPU cores, allowing the performance to scale solely on the computational capability of the card.

Q: Is the Medium preset a good compromise between Low and Ultra?

A: Yes. At 1440p, Medium provides 165 FPS, which is 76 FPS more than Ultra and only 24 FPS less than Low. This makes it the most balanced option for maintaining high frame rates while improving visual quality over Low.