Dave The Diver

Dave The Diver

AVERAGE FPS
115
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 115 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 63 71 80 95
1440p QHD 94 106 119 142
1080p Full HD 124 141 158 189

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 95
3840x2160 Medium 80
3840x2160 High 71
3840x2160 Ultra 63
2560x1440 Low 142
2560x1440 Medium 119
2560x1440 High 106
2560x1440 Ultra 94
1920x1080 Low 189
1920x1080 Medium 158
1920x1080 High 141
1920x1080 Ultra 124

Dave The Diver with Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis

# Dave The Diver with Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc B580

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Dave The Diver, with the data showing this pairing sits at rank 2132 out of 2867 tested combos—a middle-of-the-pack position that masks some surprisingly strong performance at specific settings. The CPU, a 10-core, 10-thread Arrow Lake part with a 3.30 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost clock, pairs with the Arc B580's 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus to produce frame rates that range from 63 FPS at 4K Ultra to 189 FPS at 1080p Low. What makes this pairing interesting is how the bottleneck shifts across resolutions, with the CPU's single-thread strength (a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655) proving sufficient even at lower resolutions where the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute becomes the limiting factor.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225's 10 cores and 10 threads represent a deliberate design choice: no hyperthreading, relying instead on the Arrow Lake architecture's efficiency to deliver strong per-core performance. The 3.30 GHz base clock and 4.90 GHz boost clock provide the headroom needed for Dave The Diver's simulation and AI routines, which the benchmark data suggests are not particularly demanding—the CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all tested CPUs with an average benchmark score of 36938. This places it in close competition with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (deltaPct 0), AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (deltaPct -0.2), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (deltaPct -0.4), and Intel Core i9-12900T (deltaPct -0.5), meaning the 225 is effectively trading blows with these rivals within a half-percent margin.

In practical terms for Dave The Diver, the CPU's 20 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth appear more than adequate. The game's genre as an adventure title suggests relatively light CPU load compared to strategy or simulation games, and the measured FPS data supports this interpretation. At 1080p Low, the combination reaches 189 FPS, which would typically indicate a CPU-limited scenario at such high frame rates—yet the Core Ultra 5 225 handles it without apparent issue. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25891 and single-core score of 3655 both point to a balanced processor that won't create a noticeable bottleneck in this title, even when the GPU is pushed to its limits at 4K.

The Passmark suite reveals additional context: the CPU's physics score of 2342 and multithread score of 30459 suggest robust game logic processing capability. The data compression score of 302811 and encryption score of 22285 indicate strong general-purpose compute, though these are less relevant to gaming performance. The 3 nm process node from TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, provides the efficiency headroom for the 4.90 GHz boost clock without excessive power draw—though the 65W TDP is a specification that speaks to the design's efficiency rather than a performance ceiling. For Dave The Diver specifically, the CPU's role appears to be that of a capable overseer, never becoming the primary constraint across any of the tested settings.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580, based on the Xe2-HPG architecture and codenamed Battlemage, brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth to the table. This memory configuration is particularly relevant for Dave The Diver, which the data suggests is not VRAM-hungry at the tested settings—even at 4K Ultra, the combination maintains 63 FPS, indicating the GPU's memory subsystem is not being overwhelmed. The 2670 MHz base and boost clock (identical, suggesting a fixed clock design) drive 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s.

The GPU's benchmark profile positions it at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (deltaPct -0.2), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (deltaPct 0.6), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (deltaPct -0.7), and NVIDIA P106-100 (deltaPct -1). The near-tie with the RTX 3080 is notable—a modern Intel part matching a previous-generation high-end NVIDIA card in aggregate benchmarks suggests the Arc B580's architecture is well-optimized for certain workloads. The Passmark G3D score of 15748 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 both indicate strong DirectX and Vulkan performance, which aligns with the game's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with version 12_2).

In Dave The Diver, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution increases. At 1080p, the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is more than sufficient, allowing the CPU to push frame rates to 189 FPS at Low settings. The scaling from 1080p to 4K shows the GPU taking over as the primary constraint—at 4K Ultra, the 63 FPS average suggests the Arc B580's compute and memory bandwidth are being fully utilized. The 20 RT cores and support for Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 are present, though Dave The Diver's art style likely doesn't stress ray tracing capabilities. The GPU's 190W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface are adequate for this workload, with the 12 GB VRAM providing comfortable headroom even at the highest settings tested.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern across the three tested resolutions, with the GPU increasingly dominating the performance equation as pixel count rises. At 1080p, the Low preset achieves 189 FPS, Medium reaches 158 FPS (with a minimum of 134 and maximum of 182), High hits 141 FPS, and Ultra drops to 124 FPS. Moving to 1440p, these numbers fall to 142 FPS (Low), 119 FPS (Medium, with a range of 101-137), 106 FPS (High), and 94 FPS (Ultra). At 4K, the decline continues: 95 FPS (Low), 80 FPS (Medium, ranging 68-92), 71 FPS (High), and 63 FPS (Ultra).

The resolution scaling tells a compelling story about the limiting component. From 1080p Low to 1440p Low, the frame rate drops from 189 to 142 FPS—a 24.9% reduction for a 77.8% increase in pixel count. From 1440p Low to 4K Low, the drop is from 142 to 95 FPS, a 33.1% reduction for a 125% pixel increase. These diminishing returns suggest that at lower settings, the CPU begins to play a more significant role, while at higher settings and resolutions, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution narrows as resolution increases: at 1080p, the difference is 65 FPS (189 vs 124), at 1440p it's 48 FPS (142 vs 94), and at 4K it's 32 FPS (95 vs 63). This compression indicates that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily loaded that even dropping from Ultra to Low only recovers 32 FPS, whereas at 1080p the same settings change yields 65 FPS—evidence that the CPU's capability is being masked by GPU limitations at higher resolutions.

The data implies that for this combination, 1440p represents the sweet spot where both components are reasonably balanced. At 1440p Ultra, the 94 FPS average is smooth and playable, while at 4K Ultra, the 63 FPS average sits at the edge of what many players would consider acceptable. The Medium preset at 1440p, with its 119 FPS average and 101 FPS minimum, demonstrates that this pairing can comfortably handle high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming without needing to compromise on visual quality. The 4K Medium result of 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS, suggests that even at 4K, moderate settings deliver a playable experience—the bottleneck is the GPU's compute throughput rather than its memory subsystem, as the 12 GB VRAM is never fully taxed at these settings.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 sufficient for Dave The Diver at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the data shows the combination achieves 63 FPS at 4K Ultra, and the CPU's 10 cores and 4.90 GHz boost clock provide ample headroom. The bottleneck at this setting is the GPU, as evidenced by the relatively small FPS gain (32 FPS) when dropping from Ultra to Low at 4K.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 places it within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, deltaPct -0.2), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, deltaPct 0.6), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, deltaPct -0.7), and NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, deltaPct -1). This indicates near-identical aggregate performance despite architectural differences.

Q: What is the best resolution for achieving 120+ FPS with this combination?

A: The data shows 120+ FPS is achievable at 1080p across all settings (189 FPS Low, 158 FPS Medium, 141 FPS High, 124 FPS Ultra) and at 1440p Low (142 FPS). At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 119 FPS, just below the 120 FPS threshold.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance in Dave The Diver?

A: The limiting component shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the constraint, evidenced by the 65 FPS gap between Low and Ultra settings. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the same settings change yields only 32 FPS improvement, indicating the Arc B580's compute is the primary constraint.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?

A: This pairing ranks 2132 out of 2867 tested combos, placing it in the 74th percentile of all combinations. This mid-tier ranking is consistent with the CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 68th percentile individual positions.

Q: What settings provide the best balance at 1440p?

A: The 1440p Medium preset offers 119 FPS average with a 101 FPS minimum and 137 FPS maximum, providing smooth performance with good visual quality. The High preset at 106 FPS is also viable, but the Medium preset's minimum frame rate of 101 FPS ensures more consistent performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 189 FPS, while Medium reaches 158 FPS with a minimum of 134 and maximum of 182. High settings produce 141 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 124 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at this resolution is 65 FPS, indicating that settings have a substantial impact at 1080p.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates step down noticeably. Low settings deliver 142 FPS average, Medium hits 119 FPS with a range of 101 to 137, High achieves 106 FPS, and Ultra produces 94 FPS. The 48 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at 1440p shows a more compressed range than at 1080p, suggesting the GPU is beginning to assert its influence.

At 3840x2160, the performance envelope tightens further. Low settings yield 95 FPS average, Medium reaches 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 and maximum of 92, High achieves 71 FPS, and Ultra drops to 63 FPS. The 32 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K represents the smallest settings impact across all resolutions, confirming that the Arc B580 is the primary constraint at 4K. The Medium preset's minimum of 68 FPS provides the only sub-60 FPS frame time data point in the entire measurement set, suggesting that even at 4K, this combination rarely dips below playable thresholds.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data points toward 1440p Medium as the optimal experience for this combination. The 119 FPS average with a 101 FPS minimum provides a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience while maintaining visual quality above the Low preset. At 1080p, the Medium preset at 158 FPS (minimum 134 FPS) offers an even higher safety margin, but the 1440p Medium result demonstrates that the combination can handle the higher resolution without sacrificing playability. For players prioritizing maximum visual fidelity, 1440p Ultra at 94 FPS is viable, though the Medium preset's superior minimum frame rate (101 vs no minimum data for Ultra) suggests better consistency.

At 4K, the High preset at 71 FPS is the most balanced choice, offering better visual quality than Medium's 80 FPS at a modest 9 FPS cost. The 4K Ultra result of 63 FPS is technically playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The data suggests that 4K Medium (80 FPS with 68 FPS minimum) is the safest choice for consistent performance at this resolution. Interestingly, the Low preset at 1080p yields 189 FPS, which could benefit players with 200 Hz+ displays, though the game's adventure genre likely doesn't demand such extreme refresh rates. The Medium presets across all three resolutions consistently provide the best balance of frame rate stability, as evidenced by the minimum frame data being recorded only for Medium settings—suggesting these presets are where the combination performs most predictably.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2132 out of 2867 tested combos in Dave The Diver, placing it in the 74th percentile of all configurations. This ranking is noteworthy because it sits below what the individual component percentiles might suggest—the CPU at 85th percentile and GPU at 68th percentile would typically predict a higher combined ranking. The discrepancy implies that Dave The Diver's performance characteristics favor combinations with different component balance, or that the game's engine is particularly sensitive to certain architectural features that this pairing doesn't optimally exploit.

The ranking becomes more comprehensible when examining the CPU's nearest rivals. The Core Ultra 5 225 trades blows with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, Ryzen 5 5500X3D, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, and Intel Core i9-12900T, all within a 0.5% performance band. Similarly, the Arc B580's GPU rivals—RX 580 2048SP, RTX 2080, RTX 3080, and P106-100—all fall within a 1% score range. This tight clustering at both component levels suggests that the 2132 ranking is more a reflection of the game's specific demands rather than a deficiency in either component. The combination's actual measured performance in Dave The Diver—with 63 FPS at 4K Ultra and 124 FPS at 1080p Ultra—demonstrates that despite the mid-pack ranking, this pairing delivers consistently playable results across all tested configurations, making it a reliable choice for this title even if it doesn't top the charts.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

Cores / Threads 10 / 10
Base Clock 3300 MHz
Boost Clock 4900 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B580

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2670 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc B580 in Dave The Diver

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 95.0
3840x2160 Medium 80.0
3840x2160 High 71.0
3840x2160 Ultra 63.0
2560x1440 Low 142.0
2560x1440 Medium 119.0
2560x1440 High 106.0
2560x1440 Ultra 94.0
1920x1080 Low 189.0
1920x1080 Medium 158.0
1920x1080 High 141.0
1920x1080 Ultra 124.0

Dave The Diver with iUltra 5 225 + Other GPUs

See how Dave The Diver performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Dave The Diver with Arc B580 + Other CPUs

See how Dave The Diver performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 225 + Arc B580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.