Archeage

Archeage, a 2014 MMORPG, places specific demands on a system that are clearly exposed when pairing the Intel Core i7-12700KF with the Intel Arc B370. The measured FPS data for this combination reveals a configuration that is heavily constrained by the graphics processor, particularly as resolution increases. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, examining how the CPU and GPU each contribute to the final frame rates across different settings and resolutions, and contextualizes the combo’s overall standing.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and immediate, pointing directly at the Intel Arc B370 as the primary limiting component. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 65 FPS. Moving to 1440p, that average falls to 43 FPS, a reduction of 22 FPS. At 4K, the average plummets to 25 FPS. This pattern—a roughly one-third loss at each major resolution step—is a classic sign of a GPU that is running out of pixel throughput, not a CPU bottleneck. The Arc B370’s compute capabilities, pegged at 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, are simply not enough to sustain high frame rates as the pixel count multiplies.

The trend repeats across every settings preset. With Medium settings, the averages are 57 FPS at 1080p, 39 FPS at 1440p, and 22 FPS at 4K. The delta between 1080p and 4K is 35 FPS, showing that even when the workload is eased, the GPU still cannot keep up with the increased resolution. For High settings, the numbers are 39 FPS at 1080p, 26 FPS at 1440p, and 15 FPS at 4K. The absolute frame rates are lower, but the percentage drop from 1080p to 4K remains severe, reinforcing that the resolution is the dominant factor in performance degradation.

What does this imply for the CPU’s role? The Intel Core i7-12700KF, with its 12 cores and 20 threads, is not the bottleneck here. If the CPU were limiting, we would expect to see smaller FPS differences between 1440p and 4K, as the GPU would have more time to render each frame. Instead, the data shows a consistent and large FPS penalty at every resolution increase, which is the signature of a GPU-bound scenario. The Arc B370’s memory being "System Shared" and bandwidth being "System Dependent" further compounds this, as the GPU must contend for memory bandwidth that is also used by the CPU, a situation that worsens at higher resolutions where more data needs to be moved.

The Ultra preset illustrates the extreme end of this scaling. At 1080p Ultra, the combo averages 27 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 18 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 10 FPS. These numbers are barely playable, and the 4K result is a slideshow. The data suggests that the Arc B370, which ranks in the 5th percentile for all GPUs and sits near the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 in benchmark scores, is fundamentally mismatched for 4K gaming in Archeage. The resolution scaling analysis makes it clear that this combo should be targeted at 1080p, and even then, only with lower settings to achieve acceptable frame rates.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a powerful desktop processor, but in this Archeage test, its influence on the final FPS is muted by the GPU’s limitations. The CPU’s benchmark scores are robust: it achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838 and a single-core score of 4071. Its Geekbench scores are 14367 multicore and 2255 single-core. These numbers place the CPU in the 85th percentile for all CPUs, indicating it is far more capable than the average processor. Its 12 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz, are more than sufficient for a 2014 MMORPG like Archeage, which is unlikely to scale perfectly across 20 threads.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in benchmark scores are the Intel Core i7-13700T (with a deltaPct of -0.1) and the Intel Core i5-13600T (with a deltaPct of 0.2). This shows the 12700KF is performance-adjacent to those chips, all within a fraction of a percent of each other. The 3DMark scores reinforce this: the CPU posts 9282 in the 16-thread test and 9983 at max threads, but only 1043 in single-thread. The single-thread score, while not the highest, is still adequate for older games that may rely on fewer core threads.

Given the GPU’s 5th percentile ranking, the CPU is never the limiting factor in these measured results. Consider the 1080p Low settings score of 65 FPS. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see that score remain similar at higher resolutions, because the CPU work per frame is roughly constant. Instead, the FPS drops to 43 at 1440p and 25 at 4K, proving the CPU has headroom left unused. The data implies that this combo’s performance would be significantly higher with a more powerful GPU, as the i7-12700KF can easily feed frames faster than the Arc B370 can render them. The CPU’s role is to provide a stable platform without introducing stutter or frame drops, and the benchmark data indicates it does so, but the final FPS numbers are dictated by the graphics card.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combos for Archeage, this pairing of Intel Core i7-12700KF and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2546 out of 2761 combinations. This places it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems. The comboRankInGame field specifically lists this rank, and it is a strong indicator that this is not a high-performing configuration for this particular game. The rank is a composite measure, likely weighing FPS across all resolutions and settings, and the low position aligns with the GPU’s poor percentile ranking.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 1184, and its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (deltaPct -0.2), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (deltaPct -0.5), and AMD Radeon HD 7650M (deltaPct -0.7). These are older, low-end cards, and the Arc B370 is only 1.4% faster than the AMD FirePro M2000. For a modern integrated GPU based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, this is a poor showing. The CPU, in contrast, ranks in the 85th percentile, meaning the combo’s low rank is almost entirely attributable to the GPU.

The disparity between the CPU’s high percentile (85) and the GPU’s low percentile (5) creates a severely imbalanced system. The combo rank of 2546 out of 2761 suggests that most other tested combinations, even those with much weaker CPUs, outperform this setup simply because they have more capable graphics hardware. The data implies that if the same CPU were paired with a mid-range discrete GPU, the combo rank would improve dramatically. As it stands, the Arc B370 holds back the entire system, and the benchmark results reflect that this is not a configuration suited for demanding gaming, even in an older title like Archeage.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves in Archeage?

A: The highest average FPS across all measured settings is 65 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184. It is 0.2% slower than the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% slower than the ATI Radeon HD 5770, and 0.7% slower than the AMD Radeon HD 7650M.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The FPS drops significantly when moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K, which is a sign of GPU-bound performance. The CPU, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28838, has ample headroom.

Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested systems for Archeage?

A: This combo ranks 2546 out of 2761 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom portion of the database.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo averages 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 44 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU’s high benchmark score translate to high FPS in this game?

A: No. The CPU scores in the 85th percentile for all CPUs, but the final FPS is constrained by the GPU, which scores in the 5th percentile. So the CPU’s power is not fully utilized.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the decisive component in this combo’s performance, and the measured data shows it is severely underpowered for Archeage at higher resolutions. The GPU’s specifications paint a clear picture: it has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units. Its boost clock is 2400 MHz, and its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. These are modest numbers for a modern GPU, and its FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS places it in the entry-level category. The GPU’s memory is "System Shared," meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and relies on system memory, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." This is a significant drawback for gaming, as memory bandwidth is often a key factor in texture-heavy scenes.

The GPU’s benchmark results are sparse, with only a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. This score puts it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals are all older, low-performance cards. For example, it is 0.5% slower than the ATI Radeon HD 5770, a card that is over a decade old. This context is crucial: the Arc B370 is not just slow for its generation; it competes with hardware from a much older era.

In practice, this means the GPU cannot handle the demands of Archeage’s higher settings. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 27, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. At 4K, even Low settings yield only 25 FPS, and Ultra drops to 10 FPS. The GPU’s 25 W TDP and IGP form factor suggest it is designed for low-power systems, not gaming. The data implies that the only way to get playable frame rates (above 60 FPS) is to use 1080p with Low settings, which achieves 65 FPS. The GPU’s role is thus to limit the entire experience, and the benchmark results indicate that users should not expect to play this game at high resolutions or high presets with this component.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user’s priority for frame rate versus visual quality. The only setting that achieves an average above 60 FPS is 1920x1080 with Low settings, hitting 65 FPS. This is the only configuration that provides a smooth, competitive frame rate. If a higher preset is desired, the Medium settings at 1080p yield 57 FPS, which is close to 60 FPS but may experience occasional dips, as indicated by the minimum of 49 FPS.

For users willing to accept lower frame rates, 1440p with Low settings produces an average of 43 FPS, which is playable for a slower-paced MMORPG but not ideal. The data shows that High settings at 1080p drop to 39 FPS, and Ultra at 1080p falls to 27 FPS. These lower frame rates would likely be noticeable and could detract from the experience, especially in crowded areas with many players.

The recommendation is clear: use 1080p with Low settings for the best experience. This preset provides the highest average FPS (65) and avoids the steep performance penalties seen at higher resolutions. If the user wants better visual fidelity, 1080p Medium at 57 FPS is a reasonable compromise, but they should be prepared for frame rate fluctuations. Avoid 1440p and 4K entirely, as the average FPS at those resolutions, even on Low, is below 45 FPS, and Ultra settings at any resolution result in unplayable frame rates (27 FPS at 1080p, 18 FPS at 1440p, 10 FPS at 4K). The measured data strongly suggests that this combo is only viable for 1080p gaming, and even then, only with lower presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full dataset of measured FPS for this combo provides a complete picture of its capabilities across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 65 on Low to 27 on Ultra. Specifically, Low averages 65 FPS, Medium averages 57 FPS (with a minimum of 49 and maximum of 66), High averages 39 FPS, and Ultra averages 27 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 38 FPS, showing how much visual quality costs in performance.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages fall significantly. Low settings achieve 43 FPS, Medium averages 39 FPS (minimum 33, maximum 44), High averages 26 FPS, and Ultra averages 18 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 25 FPS, but the absolute numbers are much lower. At this resolution, no preset reaches 60 FPS, and even Low settings are below 45 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the performance is marginal. Low settings average 25 FPS, Medium averages 22 FPS (minimum 19, maximum 25), High averages 15 FPS, and Ultra averages 10 FPS. The 4K results are uniformly poor, with no preset reaching playable levels. The minimum FPS of 19 at Medium 4K indicates significant frame drops, making the experience stuttery.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: each resolution step reduces FPS by roughly 35-40%, and each settings preset step reduces FPS by a similar margin. The most significant drop is from 1080p Low to 1080p Ultra, which loses 38 FPS. The least significant drop is from 1440p Low to 1440p Medium, which loses only 4 FPS. This suggests that the Medium preset is the most efficient in terms of frame rate per visual quality gain at 1440p, but the overall numbers are too low to recommend it. The measured FPS breakdown confirms that this combo is best suited for 1080p Low, with all other configurations providing a suboptimal experience.