Archeage

Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Arc B370 pairing in ArcheAge produces a playable experience only at 1080p with Low or Medium settings, while higher resolutions and presets fall below acceptable frame rates. The data shows this combo ranks 3423 out of 3708 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems for this game. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 10, making the game effectively unplayable, while 1080p Low reaches 65 FPS, which is the only tested configuration that approaches smooth gameplay. The CPU is a strong performer relative to other processors, but the GPU severely limits the overall results.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this CPU/GPU pair in ArcheAge?

A: The measured data shows 1920x1080 with Low settings produces the highest average FPS at 65, followed by 1920x1080 Medium at 57 FPS. These are the only two tested configurations that exceed 50 FPS average.

Q: How does this combo compare to other tested systems in ArcheAge?

A: This combination ranks 3423 out of 3708 tested combos, meaning roughly 92% of tested systems perform better in this game. The rank places it in the lower percentile of all tested configurations.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12600KF a bottleneck in this setup?

A: Benchmark data shows the CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27799. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, scores 27872, a delta of -0.3%, indicating the CPU is competitive with higher-tier processors. The GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings average 65 FPS while Ultra averages 27 FPS. This represents a 38 FPS drop, or roughly 58% lower performance when moving from Low to Ultra.

Q: Can this system handle 1440p gaming in ArcheAge?

A: At 2560x1440, the best result is 43 FPS on Low settings. Medium settings drop to 39 FPS, High to 26 FPS, and Ultra to 18 FPS. Only Low and Medium settings at 1440p reach playable frame rates, and neither is consistently smooth.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 1184, placing it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186 with a delta of -0.2%, showing the B370 performs nearly identically to that older mobile GPU.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12600KF provides 10 cores and 16 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. This processor has a 20 MB shared L3 cache, with 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core. The CPU's benchmark results demonstrate strong multi-threaded capability: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 23391, while the single-core test scores 3302. Geekbench multicore reaches 12137 and single-core 2157. PassMark multithread scoring hits 27575, with single-thread at 3925.

In ArcheAge, a 2014 MMORPG, the CPU's role is significant because MMOs typically involve many simultaneous entity calculations, player positions, and world state updates. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1995 in 2-thread tests to 7956 in 16-thread tests, indicating the CPU handles increased thread counts well. The max-thread score of 7952 nearly matches the 16-thread score, suggesting the processor is fully utilized at high thread counts.

The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27799. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-10900K at 27872 (delta -0.3%), AMD Ryzen 5 8500GE at 27712 (delta 0.3%), AMD Ryzen 7 6800U at 27887 (delta -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D at 27896 (delta -0.3%). These deltas show the i5-12600KF performs essentially on par with those processors, all within a 0.3% margin. For a 10-core, 16-thread part, this level of performance indicates the CPU is not the weak link in this gaming configuration.

The PassMark physics score of 1539 and find prime numbers score of 91 suggest the CPU handles physics calculations and integer workloads adequately for a game like ArcheAge, which relies on server-side computations for many mechanics. The data compression score of 343231 and encryption score of 18445 indicate strong general-purpose performance. The extended instructions score of 22003 shows the CPU can handle modern instruction sets, which can benefit game engine optimizations.

Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, though the measured FPS data does not separate memory type effects. The CPU's PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU, though the GPU's IGP bus interface means it connects differently than a discrete card. The CPU's 125W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 mounting are relevant for system builders, but the game performance is what matters here.

Since ArcheAge's engine likely does not scale perfectly with 16 threads, the strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R20 single-core 1386, 3DMark single-thread 1016) matters more. The measured FPS results reflect this: at 1080p Low, the system reaches 65 FPS, which suggests the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at lower settings where the GPU is not the sole bottleneck. However, at higher settings like Ultra, the FPS drops dramatically, indicating the GPU cannot keep up regardless of CPU capability.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated GPU based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, along with 10 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 300 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory is system shared, meaning the GPU uses the system's main memory rather than dedicated VRAM, with bandwidth described as system dependent. The GPU's pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS.

The GPU's benchmark performance is extremely low, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. This places it at the 5th percentile among all GPUs, meaning 95% of tested GPUs perform better. Its nearest rivals are all older or low-end parts: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186 (delta -0.2%), ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190 (delta -0.5%), AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192 (delta -0.7%), and AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168 (delta 1.4%). These deltas show the B370 performs within 1.4% of these legacy GPUs, confirming its position as a very low-end graphics solution.

In ArcheAge, the GPU's role becomes clear when examining the measured FPS across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160, the best average FPS is 25 on Low settings, dropping to 10 on Ultra. At 2560x1440, Low settings reach 43 FPS, while Ultra drops to 18 FPS. At 1920x1080, Low achieves 65 FPS, Medium 57 FPS, High 39 FPS, and Ultra 27 FPS. The pattern shows that the GPU struggles with higher resolutions and settings, as expected from its 5th percentile ranking.

The system shared memory architecture means the GPU has no dedicated VRAM, relying on the CPU's memory bandwidth. This is a critical limitation for a game like ArcheAge, which may require frequent texture streaming and memory access. The 25W TDP and IGP slot width indicate this is an integrated solution, not a discrete graphics card, further limiting its gaming capability.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which means it can run modern graphics APIs. However, the raw compute power is insufficient for demanding settings. The FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS is low compared to what modern games typically require for high settings at 1080p, let alone higher resolutions.

The measured FPS at 4K Ultra (10 FPS) demonstrates that the GPU cannot handle high pixel counts with complex shading. Even at 1080p Ultra (27 FPS), the frame rate is below the 30 FPS threshold typically considered minimally playable. The GPU's performance is consistent with its benchmark percentile: it is designed for basic display output, not gaming at competitive settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of this combo's capabilities in ArcheAge. At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are poor across all settings. Ultra settings yield an average of 10 FPS, which is unplayable. High settings reach 15 FPS, Medium 22 FPS (with a min of 19 and max of 25), and Low 25 FPS. None of these 4K results approach playable frame rates, with even the best scenario (Low) falling short of 30 FPS.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), performance improves but remains limited. Low settings average 43 FPS, which is the only 1440p configuration above 40 FPS. Medium settings average 39 FPS with a range of 33 to 44 FPS, placing it near the edge of playability. High settings drop to 26 FPS, and Ultra falls to 18 FPS. The data indicates that 1440p is only viable at Low or Medium settings, and even then, frame pacing may be inconsistent given the min/max ranges.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the results are more usable. Low settings achieve 65 FPS average, which is the best result across all tested configurations. Medium settings follow at 57 FPS with a min of 49 and max of 66, providing a decent experience. High settings drop to 39 FPS, which is borderline playable but may feel stuttery. Ultra settings fall to 27 FPS, below the 30 FPS threshold.

The scaling patterns reveal important insights. Moving from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 8 FPS (65 to 57), a 12% drop. From Medium to High, the cost is 18 FPS (57 to 39), a 32% drop. From High to Ultra, the cost is 12 FPS (39 to 27), a 31% drop. At 1440p, Low to Medium costs 4 FPS (43 to 39), Medium to High costs 13 FPS (39 to 26), and High to Ultra costs 8 FPS (26 to 18). At 4K, Low to Medium costs 3 FPS (25 to 22), Medium to High costs 7 FPS (22 to 15), and High to Ultra costs 5 FPS (15 to 10).

Resolution scaling also shows steep penalties. At Low settings, moving from 1080p to 1440p costs 22 FPS (65 to 43), and from 1440p to 4K costs 18 FPS (43 to 25). At Ultra settings, 1080p to 1440p costs 9 FPS (27 to 18), and 1440p to 4K costs 8 FPS (18 to 10). The consistent drop across resolutions confirms the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

The 1080p Medium settings (57 FPS average, 49 min, 66 max) represent the best balance of visual quality and performance among all tested options. The min FPS of 49 indicates that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays above 45 FPS. In contrast, 1080p High (39 FPS) has no min/max data, but the average is 18 FPS lower than Medium, suggesting a significant visual quality increase that the GPU cannot sustain.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of Intel Core i5-12600KF and Intel Arc B370 ranks 3423 out of 3708 tested combos in ArcheAge. This places it in the bottom 7.7% of all tested systems, meaning 285 better-performing combos exist in the database. The rank reflects the GPU's severe limitation, as the CPU alone would rank much higher based on its 79th percentile among CPUs.

To contextualize the GPU's impact, consider that the CPU's average benchmark score of 27799 places it near the top of its class. The GPU's average benchmark score of 1184 places it near the bottom of all GPUs. When paired, the weak GPU drags the entire system down to a low rank. The combo rank of 3423 out of 3708 is consistent with the GPU's 5th percentile performance.

The nearest CPU rivals (i9-10900K, Ryzen 5 8500GE, Ryzen 7 6800U, Ryzen 7 5800X3D) all have similar CPU scores, but none of them are paired with the B370 in this test. The GPU's nearest rivals (Mobility Radeon HD 5570, Radeon HD 5770, Radeon HD 7650M, FirePro M2000) are all from the early 2010s, and the B370's performance is on par with them. This explains why the combo ranks so low: the GPU is effectively a decade-old performer.

For ArcheAge specifically, the game's requirements are moderate by modern standards, but this GPU still cannot deliver high frame rates. The combo rank of 3423 indicates that most other tested systems, even those with older CPUs, outperform this pairing because they have more capable GPUs. The data suggests that a system with a weaker CPU but a stronger GPU would likely rank higher in this game, as ArcheAge's performance is more GPU-bound at the settings tested.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo in ArcheAge are 1920x1080 with Medium quality. This configuration produces an average FPS of 57, with a minimum of 49 and maximum of 66. The 49 FPS minimum ensures that even during intense combat or crowded areas, the frame rate stays above 45 FPS, providing a reasonably smooth experience. Medium settings also offer better visual fidelity than Low, making this the best overall choice.

If a player prefers higher visual quality, 1080p High settings (39 FPS average) may be acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but the 39 FPS average is below the 40 FPS threshold that many players consider minimum for smooth MMO play. The lack of min/max data for High settings means the frame rate could dip lower in demanding scenes. Ultra settings at 1080p (27 FPS) are not recommended, as the frame rate falls below 30 FPS, which will feel choppy.

For players who prioritize frame rate over visuals, 1080p Low settings (65 FPS average) provide the smoothest experience. This is the only tested configuration that consistently exceeds 60 FPS, making it ideal for fast-paced combat or large-scale PvP where reaction time matters. The trade-off is reduced visual quality, but the performance gain is significant.

At 1440p, only Low settings (43 FPS) are consistently playable. Medium settings (39 FPS) are borderline, but the min of 33 FPS suggests potential drops below 30 FPS in heavy scenes. High and Ultra at 1440p are not viable, with averages of 26 and 18 FPS respectively. 4K is not playable at any settings, with the best result being 25 FPS on Low.

The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming with reasonable settings. The GPU's limitations become apparent at higher resolutions, where even Low settings cannot maintain 30 FPS at 4K. For ArcheAge specifically, the Medium preset at 1080p offers the best compromise between visual quality and performance, delivering a playable experience without requiring the lowest settings. Players who are sensitive to frame drops should use Low settings at 1080p, while those who want better visuals can try Medium and accept occasional dips to around 49 FPS.