AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark measurements for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core i9-14901TE. Both processors hold a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, and both carry an average benchmark score of 0 in the current dataset. This means there are no exact numerical deltas to report for multi-core, single-core, or integrated graphics comparisons. The absence of benchmark data does not indicate parity; it simply reflects that no standardized test results have been logged for either part at this time.

Without recorded scores, the analysis must rely on architectural specifications and platform capabilities rather than performance deltas. The AMD part boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel part boosts higher to 5.50 GHz. Base clocks differ substantially: the AMD runs at 3.80 GHz, the Intel at 2.30 GHz. These clock figures suggest different operating profiles, but without benchmark results, a direct performance ranking cannot be established from the database.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the available specification data, each processor demonstrates advantages in different areas.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, with a die size of 178 mm² and 25,000 million transistors. The smaller process node typically indicates higher transistor density and potentially better power efficiency per unit of silicon area. Its base clock of 3.80 GHz is significantly higher than the Intel part's 2.30 GHz, which can translate to stronger sustained performance in workloads that operate at base frequency rather than boosting. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics is present on the AMD chip, which may offer different graphics capabilities compared to Intel's solution.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE counters with a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which can benefit bursty, single-threaded workloads that scale with peak frequency. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel with a die size of 257 mm². The larger L3 cache of 36 MB shared, compared to 16 MB on the AMD part, provides more on-die storage for frequently accessed data. The Intel part also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR5. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes on the Intel platform offers newer interconnect bandwidth versus the AMD's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is built on Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, part of the 8000 series. It uses a 4 nm process manufactured by TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The cache hierarchy is 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The memory interface is dual-channel DDR5 with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, and the market segment is classified as mobile. The part was released on 2024-04-01 and remains active in production. The multiplier is locked, and the part number is listed as unknown.

The Intel Core i9-14901TE is based on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel foundry, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy is 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The memory interface is dual-channel, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, though no specific memory bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is supported. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the market segment is desktop. The release date is 2024-06-30, and production status is active. The multiplier is locked, and the part number is Q49CSRNJJ.

Both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads, and both have a TDP of 45 watts. Both support ECC memory. The integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon 780M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The PCIe implementation differs in both generation and lane count: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The AMD part has a significantly smaller die size (178 mm² vs 257 mm²) and a more advanced process node (4 nm vs 10 nm). The Intel part has more L2 cache per core (2 MB vs 1 MB) and more L3 cache (36 MB vs 16 MB). The AMD part has a higher base clock (3.80 GHz vs 2.30 GHz), while the Intel part has a higher boost clock (5.50 GHz vs 5.10 GHz).

The Verdict

The data in the database does not support a definitive performance winner because no benchmark scores are recorded for either processor. The decision between these two parts must therefore rest on platform and specification differences.

For workloads that favor a higher base clock and a more advanced manufacturing process, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS presents a compelling option. Its 3.80 GHz base clock is substantially higher than the Intel's 2.30 GHz, and the 4 nm TSMC process with a smaller die size suggests a denser, potentially more efficient design. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded figure that may benefit memory-intensive applications. The AMD part is classified as a mobile segment processor, which may be relevant for embedded or compact system designs.

For workloads that favor higher boost clocks and larger cache capacities, the Intel Core i9-14901TE has advantages. The 5.50 GHz boost clock is the highest recorded between the two. The L3 cache of 36 MB is more than double the AMD's 16 MB, which can help with data reuse in certain workloads. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives system designers flexibility in memory choice. The PCIe Gen 5 interface offers a newer standard, though with fewer lanes (16 vs 20). The Intel part is classified as a desktop segment processor.

Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database, so no pricing analysis is possible. Both parts are active in production and support ECC memory. Both have locked multipliers.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core i9-14901TE have 8 cores and 16 threads. There is no difference in core count.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part is higher by 0.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i9-14901TE supports DDR4 memory. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 memory only. Both support dual-channel memory configurations.

Q: What are the process node and die size differences?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses a 4 nm process from TSMC with a die size of 178 mm². The Intel Core i9-14901TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel with a die size of 257 mm².

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core i9-14901TE support ECC memory.

Q: What PCIe generations do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Intel Core i9-14901TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel part supports a newer PCIe generation, but the AMD part provides more lanes.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS | Intel Core i9-14901TE |

|---|---|---|

| Series | 8000 series | Core 14th Gen |

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 4 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 257 mm² |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | null |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-04-01 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | unknown | Q49CSRNJJ |

The two processors share 8 cores, 16 threads, a 45 watt TDP, dual-channel memory support, ECC memory support, locked multipliers, and active production status. They differ in every other recorded specification field. The AMD part uses a smaller process node and die, has a higher base clock, and more PCIe lanes. The Intel part has a higher boost clock, larger caches at every level, broader memory support, and a newer PCIe generation. Without benchmark scores, these specification differences serve as the primary basis for any comparison.