AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison

AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core i9-14901E

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i9-14901E holds a decisive advantage across the recorded benchmark suite, winning every single test where comparative data exists. The database shows a clean sweep for the Intel part, with the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS registering no wins in the head-to-head comparison. The Intel processor's average benchmark score of 37911 places it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip sits at the 50th percentile, a substantial gap in overall standing.

Looking at the most demanding multi-core workloads, the Intel Core i9-14901E posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753. This result places it in a tight cluster with rivals such as the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which scores 37904 on the aggregate benchmark metric, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37943, with a delta of -0.1 percent relative to the Intel part. The Intel chip also delivers a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10816 and a Cinebench R15 multi-core result of 2595, showing consistent scaling across different rendering workloads.

Single-core performance tells a similar story. The Intel Core i9-14901E achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635, a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1526, and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 366. These figures indicate strong per-thread capability, which is further reinforced by the PassMark single-thread score of 4354. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no direct benchmark scores recorded in the database for these specific tests, so the comparison relies on the Intel data and the relative percentile standings.

In specialized workloads, the Intel part demonstrates notable strengths. The PassMark data compression test shows a score of 288777, while data encryption reaches 18571. Integer math performance hits 112736, and floating point math scores 81089. The processor also handles extended instructions well with a score of 17249, and random string sorting completes at 39138. The multi-thread PassMark score is 30298, and the physics test registers 3041. Prime number finding is comparatively modest at 189, but this is a narrow workload that does not diminish the overall picture.

The Intel Core i9-14901E's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with an average score of 37904 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37943 with a delta of -0.1 percent, the Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 with a delta of 0.2 percent, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 37804 with a delta of 0.3 percent. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the Intel Core i9-14901E sits squarely in a competitive performance tier, slightly ahead of some and marginally behind others depending on the aggregate metric.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14901E employs the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. This process difference contributes to distinct power and thermal profiles, though the database does not record direct efficiency measurements.

Both chips feature 8 cores and 16 threads, so the core count is identical. However, the cache hierarchies differ markedly. The AMD processor allocates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a substantially larger 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 cache on the Intel part likely contributes to its performance advantage in cache-sensitive workloads, though the database does not provide direct cache-hit measurements.

Clock speeds also differ. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core i9-14901E starts at a lower base clock of 2.80 GHz but boosts higher to 5.60 GHz. The higher boost clock on the Intel chip aligns with its stronger single-core benchmark results.

The thermal design power differs as well. The AMD part is rated at 45 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 65 watts. This 20-watt gap reflects the different market positioning: the AMD chip targets mobile and embedded scenarios with lower power envelopes, while the Intel chip is a desktop part with more thermal headroom. The die size also differs, with the AMD processor at 178 mm² and the Intel processor at 257 mm². The AMD chip integrates 25,000 million transistors, while the Intel processor's transistor count is not recorded in the database.

Memory support distinguishes the two further. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 memory only, running on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i9-14901E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also on a dual-channel bus, though its memory bandwidth is not listed. Both processors support ECC memory, which is relevant for embedded and workstation applications.

PCIe capabilities differ as well. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The newer PCIe generation on the Intel side allows for higher bandwidth to attached devices, though the lane count is lower.

Integrated graphics differ between the two. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS includes Radeon 780M graphics, while the Intel Core i9-14901E includes UHD Graphics 770. The database does not provide benchmark scores for these integrated GPUs, so no direct comparison is possible.

The market segments also diverge. The AMD processor is classified as a mobile part, while the Intel processor is a desktop part. This classification influences socket compatibility and system integration. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. Both are currently in active production. The AMD part was released on 2024-04-01, and the Intel part was released on 2024-06-30.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the Intel Core i9-14901E across every recorded test. Its 86th percentile standing versus the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS's 50th percentile is a substantial margin. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 37911 places it in the same performance tier as the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, both of which score within 0.1 percent of the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its performance profile is defined only by its percentile rank and architectural specifications.

The Intel Core i9-14901E is the stronger choice for workloads that demand high multi-core throughput, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and PassMark multi-thread score of 30298. Its larger L3 cache of 36 MB and higher boost clock of 5.60 GHz support this conclusion. The processor also excels in single-core tasks, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4354.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS may still be appropriate for systems where the 45-watt TDP and mobile form factor are priorities. Its 4 nm process at TSMC and smaller die size of 178 mm² indicate a more power-efficient design, though the database does not provide direct efficiency metrics. The AMD chip's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and Radeon 780M integrated graphics could also be relevant for specific embedded applications.

For users who prioritize raw computational performance, the Intel Core i9-14901E is the clear pick based on the recorded data. For those who need a lower-power embedded solution with a compact footprint, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS offers architectural advantages that may suit specific use cases, but the performance gap in the database is decisive.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS's boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, a difference of 20 MB.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core i9-14901E support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37911, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a TDP of 45 watts, and the Intel Core i9-14901E has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-14901E wins in every benchmark category recorded in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 demonstrates dominance in rendering and content creation workloads that scale across cores. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30298 reinforces this strength in general-purpose parallel computing. For single-thread performance, the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 and PassMark single-thread score of 4354 indicate that the Intel chip also handles lightly threaded applications with ease.

The Intel processor also wins in data-heavy workloads. The PassMark data compression score of 288777 and data encryption score of 18571 show strong performance in storage and security tasks. The integer math score of 112736 and floating point math score of 81089 indicate solid computational throughput for scientific and financial applications. The extended instructions score of 17249 suggests good support for vectorized code, and the random string sorting score of 39138 points to capable data manipulation.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS does not have any recorded benchmark wins in the database, so its advantages must be inferred from its specifications. Its lower TDP of 45 watts makes it suitable for power-constrained embedded systems. Its 4 nm process node and smaller die size of 178 mm² suggest a more compact and potentially more efficient design. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics may offer better visual output than the Intel UHD Graphics 770, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The AMD chip's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a specific specification that could benefit memory-intensive workloads on a dual-channel DDR5 platform. Its PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes provides more lane count than the Intel chip's 16 lanes, which could support more connected devices. The mobile market segment classification indicates that the AMD processor is designed for laptops and embedded boards, whereas the Intel processor is aimed at desktop systems.

In summary, the Intel Core i9-14901E is the performance leader across all recorded benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS offers a different set of trade-offs centered on power efficiency and integration, but the data shows no performance category where it surpasses the Intel part.