AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a full benchmark suite for the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, while the Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for most tests. The AMD part’s recorded results can be interpreted against its nearest rivals, which are all Intel processors, to establish a performance baseline.

The Ryzen 5 7533HS posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,342 points and a single-core score of 1,742 points. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5,183 multi-core and 731 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results are 1,243 multi-core and 175 single-core. These scores place the chip at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19,364.

The nearest rival data shows this AMD processor sits within a tight cluster. The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V averages 19,368, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core i5-1345U averages 19,411, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD part. The Intel Core i7-8700K averages 19,238, putting the AMD chip 0.7% ahead. The Intel Core i7-10700F averages 19,499, meaning the AMD chip trails by 0.7%. These deltas are all under one percentage point, so the Ryzen 5 7533HS is effectively a peer of those desktop and mobile Intel parts from previous generations.

Looking at individual Passmark tests, the Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a multi-thread score of 14,520 and a single-thread score of 2,740. Floating point math hits 27,800, integer math reaches 50,800, and extended instructions score 11,219. Data encryption records 10,718, data compression scores 168,692, and random string sorting achieves 17,669. The physics test scores 821, and finding prime numbers scores 48.

Because the Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark entries, the database cannot produce a head-to-head comparison. The Intel part’s percentile of 50 with an average score of 0 reflects this absence of data, not a performance level. The AMD part’s 73rd percentile is meaningful because it is derived from actual recorded results.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS have any benchmark data?

A: Yes, the database lists 17 benchmark results for the AMD part, spanning Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple Passmark tests. The Intel Core i5-14501E has zero recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 7533HS compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD part’s average benchmark score of 19,364 is within 0.7% of four Intel processors. It matches the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V exactly, trails the Intel Core i5-1345U by 0.2%, leads the Intel Core i7-8700K by 0.7%, and trails the Intel Core i7-10700F by 0.7%.

Q: What is the clock speed difference between the two processors?

A: Both CPUs have a base clock of 3.30 GHz. The AMD part boosts to 4.40 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not list ECC support.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Which integrated graphics do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS includes Radeon 660M graphics. The Intel Core i5-14501E includes UHD Graphics 770.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear split in readiness. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a full set of benchmarks, a 73rd percentile ranking, and an average score of 19,364. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark entries, a 50th percentile placeholder, and an average score of zero.

For buyers who want verified performance numbers, the AMD part is the only one with evidence in the database. Its nearest rivals, all Intel processors with known scores, sit within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers competitive performance against those specific Intel models.

The Intel Core i5-14501E may still be a viable product, but the database cannot confirm its performance level. Any selection between these two should rely on the AMD part’s measured results, unless the Intel part’s specifications alone justify consideration. The Intel chip offers a higher boost clock and ECC support, but without benchmark data, its actual performance remains unverified.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several core specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS belongs to the 7000 series, while the Intel Core i5-14501E belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. The AMD part is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700.

The AMD chip has a TDP of 35 watts, whereas the Intel chip has a TDP of 65 watts. The base clocks match at 3.30 GHz, but the boost clocks differ: 4.40 GHz for AMD versus 5.20 GHz for Intel. The AMD part uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The die sizes are close, with AMD at 208 mm² and Intel at 215 mm².

Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure recorded. ECC memory is supported on the Intel part but not on the AMD part.

PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are Radeon 660M for AMD and UHD Graphics 770 for Intel. The release dates are close, with AMD on 2024-08-31 and Intel on 2024-06-30.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R, part of the Ryzen 5 generation. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core i5 generation with Raptor Lake Refresh.

Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads. The cache hierarchies differ. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The process nodes reflect different manufacturing approaches. AMD uses 6 nm TSMC lithography, while Intel uses 10 nm Intel lithography. The AMD part’s smaller process node likely contributes to its lower 35-watt TDP, while the Intel part’s larger node and higher 65-watt TDP suggest a different power envelope.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so both are locked for overclocking. The AMD part’s part numbers are 100-000001632 (FP7) and 100-000001634 (FP7r2), while the Intel part’s part number is Q49HSRNJM.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins on verified performance data. Its benchmark scores are recorded, and its 73rd percentile ranking places it above the majority of CPUs in the database. The nearest rival comparisons show it trading blows with the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Core i5-1345U, Intel Core i7-8700K, and Intel Core i7-10700F, all within 0.7%. For workloads measured by Cinebench and Passmark, the AMD part demonstrates consistent multi-threaded and single-threaded results.

The Intel Core i5-14501E wins on specification advantages. It has a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz compared to 4.40 GHz, which suggests potential for better single-threaded performance, though no benchmark confirms this. It supports ECC memory, a feature the AMD part lacks. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering broader compatibility with existing platforms. The Intel part’s PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes provides newer connectivity compared to the AMD part’s PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

For users requiring ECC memory, the Intel part is the only option between the two. For users needing a low-power mobile processor with proven benchmark results, the AMD part is the only one with data. The Intel part’s desktop socket and higher TDP point toward a different use case, while the AMD part’s mobile socket and 35-watt TDP target portable systems.

The database cannot award a performance win to the Intel Core i5-14501E because it has no recorded scores. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins every benchmark category by default, but the Intel part’s specifications suggest it may be competitive in scenarios where higher clock speeds and ECC support matter. Without measurements, those advantages remain theoretical.