AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS versus the Intel Core i5-14490F. The AMD processor has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed. The Intel Core i5-14490F, by contrast, has a comprehensive benchmark record. This asymmetry means the comparative analysis must rely on the Intel processor's measured performance data alongside the architectural specifications of both parts.

The Intel Core i5-14490F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and a single-core score of 3247. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9660 multi-core and 1363 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2318 multi-core and 327 single-core. These results place the Intel chip at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 38149. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T at 38194 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core i5-13600KF at 38103 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 38221 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core i5-13600HX at 38261 (0.3% behind). The data indicates the i5-14490F sits within a tight performance cluster, essentially matching those comparable processors.

PassMark results for the Intel chip show strong integer math performance at 87844 and floating-point math at 66558. Data compression scores 340026, data encryption scores 18225, and extended instructions score 21731. The multi-thread PassMark score is 28662, while the single-thread score is 3873. Physics testing yields 2093, random string sorting yields 35608, and prime number finding yields 122. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no corresponding measurements, so no direct score comparisons can be made between the two processors.

The absence of AMD benchmark data means the database cannot quantify how the 8845HS performs relative to the i5-14490F in any specific workload. The Intel processor's 86th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms the vast majority of recorded CPUs, but the AMD part's 50th percentile placement with zero recorded scores reflects missing data rather than measured performance. The recorded data supports only one conclusion: the Intel Core i5-14490F has verified benchmark scores, and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS does not.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The AMD chip integrates 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, while the Intel chip has no recorded transistor count but a die size of 215 mm².

Core configurations differ significantly. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor has 10 cores and 16 threads. Both parts support 16 threads, but the Intel chip achieves this with two additional physical cores. The AMD base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The AMD part starts at a higher base frequency but the Intel part boosts nearly as high.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has larger cache allocations at every level, with 50% more L3 cache.

Memory support differs in scope. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The AMD processor supports ECC memory, while the Intel processor does not.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD part includes integrated Radeon 780M graphics, while the Intel part has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). The AMD processor is classified as a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS belongs to the 8000 series and launched on 2024-04-01, while the Intel Core i5-14490F belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and launched on 2023-12-31. Both are listed as active in production. The Intel part has a known part number (SRN35), while the AMD part's part number is unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores. Both processors support 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14490F boosts to 5.00 GHz. The AMD part has a 0.10 GHz higher peak boost clock.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS includes Radeon 780M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 memory only. The Intel Core i5-14490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14490F rank among all CPUs in the database?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F ranks at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38149. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile by default.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded specifications:

• Cores: AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores; Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores.
• Base Clock: AMD 3.80 GHz; Intel 2.50 GHz.
• Boost Clock: AMD 5.10 GHz; Intel 5.00 GHz.
• TDP: AMD 45; Intel 65.
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8; Intel Socket 1700.
• Architecture: Zen 4; Raptor Lake.
• Codename: Hawk Point; Raptor Lake-R.
• Process Node: 4 nm; 10 nm.
• Foundry: TSMC; Intel.
• Transistors: 25,000 million; not recorded.
• Die Size: 178 mm²; 215 mm².
• L1 Cache: 64 KB per core; 80 KB per core.
• L2 Cache: 1 MB per core; 1.25 MB per core.
• L3 Cache: 16 MB shared; 24 MB shared.
• Memory Support: DDR5; DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory Bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s; not recorded.
• ECC Memory: Supported; not supported.
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 lanes; Gen 5, 16 lanes.
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 780M; N/A.
• Market Segment: Mobile; Desktop.
• Release Date: 2024-04-01; 2023-12-31.
• Part Number: unknown; SRN35.

Fields that match include thread count (16 threads for both), memory bus (dual-channel for both), multiplier unlocked status (false for both), and production status (active for both).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in every category where recorded data exists. Its multi-core performance is verified by Cinebench R23 at 23000, Cinebench R20 at 9660, and Cinebench R15 at 2318. Its single-core results are similarly recorded at 3247, 1363, and 327 across the same Cinebench versions. PassMark tests confirm strength in integer math (87844), floating-point math (66558), data compression (340026), and multi-thread workloads (28662). The 86th percentile ranking places it above nearly all recorded CPUs.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark wins because it has no benchmark scores in the database. However, specification-based advantages exist. The AMD part has a higher base clock (3.80 GHz versus 2.50 GHz) and a higher boost clock (5.10 GHz versus 5.00 GHz). It supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. It includes Radeon 780M integrated graphics, while the Intel part has none. Its 4 nm process node is smaller than the Intel 10 nm node, and its 178 mm² die is smaller than 215 mm². The AMD part provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and it has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

The Intel part wins on core count with 10 cores versus 8, and it has larger cache allocations at every level: 80 KB versus 64 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB versus 1 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB versus 16 MB L3 shared. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving broader memory compatibility. The Intel part also has a lower TDP advantage in terms of power envelope? No, the Intel TDP is 65 versus AMD's 45, so the AMD part has the lower TDP.

The use-case split from the data: for verified multi-threaded and single-threaded application performance, the Intel Core i5-14490F is the measured choice. For systems requiring ECC memory, integrated graphics, lower power consumption, or a smaller manufacturing process, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS holds the specification advantage. The AMD part targets mobile platforms on Socket FP8, while the Intel part targets desktop platforms on Socket 1700.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear verdict for the Intel Core i5-14490F in measurable performance terms. It has an 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, an average benchmark score of 38149, and a comprehensive set of Cinebench and PassMark results. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i5-13600KF and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, sit within 0.3% of its average score, confirming it performs at a competitive level within its class. The 10-core, 16-thread configuration with 24 MB of L3 cache and 5.00 GHz boost clock gives it a solid foundation for multi-threaded workloads.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS cannot be compared on benchmark merit because the database contains no scores for it. Its specifications suggest a different design intent: 8 cores and 16 threads on a 4 nm TSMC process, with ECC memory support, Radeon 780M integrated graphics, and a 45 TDP. These features point toward embedded and mobile applications where power efficiency, error-correcting memory, and graphics output matter more than raw multi-core throughput. The higher base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz indicate strong single-thread capability on paper, but no measurements confirm this.

Who should pick which, strictly from the data: users who need verified multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, larger cache, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, or dual memory type support should select the Intel Core i5-14490F. Users who need ECC memory, integrated graphics, lower TDP, a smaller process node, or a mobile form factor should select the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS based on its specification sheet. The Intel part is the only one of the two with measured benchmark evidence, and that evidence places it at the 86th percentile of all recorded CPUs. The AMD part remains an unmeasured specification entry, with its 50th percentile ranking reflecting missing data rather than demonstrated capability.