AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS
Core 7 350
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core 7 350
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows a direct comparison between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core 7 350. The Intel Core 7 350 has a substantial benchmark presence with 17 recorded scores, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark entries listed in the database. This absence of data for the AMD processor means all quantifiable performance comparisons must be drawn from the Intel part alone, and its position relative to the broader CPU landscape.
The Intel Core 7 350 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8030 and a single-core score of 2046. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result stands at 5373 with a single-core figure of 758. The older Cinebench R15 test yields 1220 for multi-core and 292 for single-core. These scores indicate a processor that handles both heavily threaded workloads and lightly threaded tasks with measurable consistency across the three Cinebench versions.
The PassMark suite provides additional granularity. The Intel Core 7 350 achieves a multi-thread score of 15170 and a single-thread score of 4100. Integer math scores 33734, floating point math reaches 42809, and extended instructions produce 12045. Data compression scores 143123, while data encryption records 10933. Random string sorting completes at 17238, find prime numbers comes in at 107, and physics workloads score 1173. The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 17779, placing it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database.
The nearest rivals listed for the Intel Core 7 350 provide context for its standing. The Intel Core 5 221TE has an average score of 17860, which is 0.5% higher than the Core 7 350. The AMD EPYC 9374F scores 17693, sitting 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT achieves 17891, which is 0.6% higher. The Intel Core 5 120U records 17898, landing 0.7% above the Core 7 350. These margins are narrow, showing that the Core 7 350 clusters tightly with a group of processors from both AMD and Intel across different market segments. The largest gap among these rivals is just 0.7%, indicating that the Core 7 350 sits in a highly competitive performance band where small deltas separate the contenders.
Because the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head section cannot offer win counts or direct score deltas. The database shows zero wins for each processor in this pairing. The practical interpretation is that the Intel Core 7 350 is the only unit with measured performance data available, and its scores define the baseline for any future comparison when AMD data becomes present.
Architecture Differences
The architectural split between these two processors is pronounced. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen Embedded generation. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename under the Core 5 generation, fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel. The process node difference is one full nanometer step, with Intel using a smaller node.
Core counts differ significantly. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 6 cores and 6 threads. This means the AMD processor offers simultaneous multithreading, doubling its thread count, whereas the Intel processor has no hyper-threading and matches threads to cores one-to-one. The AMD base clock is 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel base clock is much lower at 1.50 GHz with a boost of 4.80 GHz. The AMD processor has a higher peak frequency by 0.30 GHz.
Cache hierarchies diverge as well. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and only 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part provides substantially more L3 cache, a 10 MB difference, while the Intel part offers larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations.
Memory support differs in both type and channel configuration. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory but uses a single-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The AMD part has 29.9 GB/s more bandwidth and supports ECC, which the Intel part lacks.
PCIe connectivity also separates the two. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core 7 350 provides Gen 4 with only 6 lanes. This is a 14-lane difference in favor of AMD. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses the Radeon 780M, while the Intel part uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.
Power envelopes are starkly different. The AMD processor has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 15 watts. This 30-watt gap positions the Intel part as a much lower-power option, suitable for fanless or passively cooled designs, while the AMD part demands more substantial cooling. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP8, whereas the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1516. Both are mobile market segments. The AMD part was released in April 2024, and the Intel part was released in April 2026.
The AMD processor contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel processor has no transistor count or die size recorded in the database. The AMD part is not multiplier unlocked, and neither is the Intel part. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $469.
FAQ
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.
Q: Which processor has higher clock speeds?
A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core 7 350 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.
Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?
A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and supports DDR5 and ECC. The Intel Core 7 350 has a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth and supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X but no ECC.
Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?
A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: What are the TDP ratings?
A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a TDP of 45 watts. The Intel Core 7 350 has a TDP of 15 watts.
Q: What is the Intel Core 7 350 average benchmark score and percentile?
A: The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17779, placing it at the 71st percentile among all CPUs in the database.
The Verdict
The data in the database shows a clear division of roles between these two processors, though direct performance comparison is limited by the absence of AMD benchmark scores. The Intel Core 7 350 is the only unit with recorded measurements, and its 71st percentile standing, backed by an average score of 17779, indicates a competent mid-range mobile processor. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT and Intel Core 5 120U, all sit within 0.7% of its average score, confirming that the Core 7 350 performs in a tightly packed competitive cluster.
The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS presents a different architectural profile. It offers 8 cores with 16 threads versus the Intel part's 6 cores with 6 threads, giving it a clear advantage in raw thread count for parallel workloads. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock exceeds the Intel part's 4.80 GHz. The AMD processor also has more L3 cache, 16 MB versus 6 MB, and more PCIe lanes, 20 versus 6. Memory bandwidth is substantially higher at 89.6 GB/s versus 59.7 GB/s, and ECC support is exclusive to the AMD part.
However, the Intel Core 7 350 has a much lower TDP of 15 watts compared to 45 watts for the AMD processor. This makes the Intel part more suitable for power-constrained mobile designs, while the AMD part targets higher-performance embedded applications where power draw is a secondary concern. The Intel part also has a smaller process node at 3 nm versus 4 nm for AMD, which may contribute to its efficiency profile.
Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 350 is the choice for scenarios where low power consumption is paramount, given its 15-watt TDP and measured performance in the 71st percentile. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is the choice for workloads that demand more cores, threads, cache, memory bandwidth, and PCIe connectivity, as its specifications indicate a higher ceiling for multi-threaded and I/O-intensive tasks. Without benchmark scores for the AMD part, its actual performance remains unquantified in the database, so decisions must weigh architectural specifications against the Intel part's confirmed scores.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database.
- Cores: AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores. Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores.
- Threads: AMD has 16 threads. Intel has 6 threads.
- Base Clock: AMD is 3.80 GHz. Intel is 1.50 GHz.
- Boost Clock: AMD is 5.10 GHz. Intel is 4.80 GHz.
- TDP: AMD is 45 watts. Intel is 15 watts.
- Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8. Intel uses Intel BGA 1516.
- Codename: AMD is Hawk Point. Intel is Wildcat Lake.
- Process Node: AMD is 4 nm at TSMC. Intel is 3 nm at Intel.
- Transistors: AMD has 25,000 million. Intel has none recorded.
- Die Size: AMD is 178 mm². Intel has none recorded.
- L1 Cache: AMD has 64 KB per core. Intel has 192 KB per core.
- L2 Cache: AMD has 1 MB per core. Intel has 2.5 MB per core.
- L3 Cache: AMD has 16 MB shared. Intel has 6 MB shared.
- Memory Support: AMD supports DDR5. Intel supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.
- Memory Bus: AMD is dual-channel. Intel is single-channel.
- Memory Bandwidth: AMD is 89.6 GB/s. Intel is 59.7 GB/s.
- ECC Memory: AMD supports it. Intel does not.
- PCIe: AMD has Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Intel has Gen 4 with 6 lanes.
- Integrated Graphics: AMD uses Radeon 780M. Intel uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe.
- Release Date: AMD is April 2024. Intel is April 2026.
- Launch MSRP: AMD has none recorded. Intel has $469.
- Part Number: AMD is unknown. Intel is SAE3F.
- Percentile: AMD is at the 50th percentile. Intel is at the 71st percentile.
- Average Benchmark Score: AMD has 0 (no benchmarks). Intel has 17779.