AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core 7 253PTE Comparison

AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and Intel Core 7 253PTE are two very different processors that happen to share a 45 W TDP and dual-channel memory support. The data shows the Intel part is the stronger multi-threaded performer, while the AMD chip counters with a much higher base clock and a more advanced manufacturing process. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is a mobile-focused, 8-core Zen 4 design built on TSMC's 4 nm node, whereas the Intel Core 7 253PTE is a desktop-oriented, 10-core Bartlett Lake part using Intel's 10 nm process. The Intel chip holds the performance percentile advantage, ranking in the 84th percentile of all CPUs compared to the AMD's 50th, which indicates a substantial overall performance gap in the recorded data.

The Verdict

The benchmark database clearly favors the Intel Core 7 253PTE for multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21276, Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8935, and PassMark multi-thread score of 25031 all demonstrate a decisive lead over the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, which has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Intel part's 84th percentile ranking versus the AMD's 50th percentile confirms this performance hierarchy. The Intel Core 7 253PTE is the choice for users who need maximum thread throughput, as its 10 cores and 20 threads provide a 2-core, 4-thread advantage over the AMD's 8-core, 16-thread configuration.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, however, offers a significantly higher base clock of 3.80 GHz compared to the Intel's 1.80 GHz, which suggests superior responsiveness in lightly threaded or latency-sensitive tasks, though the Intel part's boost clock of 5.40 GHz exceeds the AMD's 5.10 GHz. The AMD also uses a more efficient 4 nm process from TSMC versus Intel's 10 nm node, which typically indicates better power efficiency per unit of work. For mobile or embedded deployments where the 45 W TDP must be carefully managed and the AMD Socket FP8 platform is the target, the Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is the logical fit. The Intel Core 7 253PTE, with its desktop Socket 1700 and launch MSRP of $384, targets stationary desktop systems.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PTE wins in every benchmark category where data exists. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3003 and PassMark single-thread score of 3794 indicate strong per-core performance despite the low 1.80 GHz base clock. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz explains this capability, allowing the Intel part to reach high frequencies when needed. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark entries, so the database shows no recorded wins for it. However, the AMD's architectural traits suggest its strength lies in sustained low-power operation: the 4 nm process node, the 3.80 GHz base clock, and the 16 MB of shared L3 cache point to a design optimized for consistent throughput at moderate power levels rather than burst performance.

The Intel part's 33 MB of shared L3 cache is more than double the AMD's 16 MB, providing an advantage in workloads that benefit from large data sets residing close to the cores. The Intel also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the AMD supports only DDR5, giving the Intel platform more flexibility in memory selection. The AMD counters with PCIe Gen 4 across 20 lanes, while the Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 across 16 lanes. The higher lane count on the AMD may benefit multi-device setups, but the Intel's Gen 5 standard doubles the per-lane bandwidth potential.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,000 million transistors and a die size of 178 mm². The Intel Core 7 253PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no transistor count or die size recorded. The AMD's smaller process node allows for higher transistor density, while the Intel's larger node is paired with a more conventional desktop design.

Core counts differ: the AMD provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel provides 10 cores and 20 threads. The cache hierarchy shows the Intel with larger per-core allocations: 80 KB of L1 per core versus 64 KB on the AMD, and 2 MB of L2 per core versus 1 MB on the AMD. The shared L3 cache heavily favors the Intel at 33 MB versus 16 MB. Memory bandwidth is identical at 89.6 GB/s for both, with dual-channel buses, and both support ECC memory. The AMD integrates Radeon 780M graphics, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD targets the mobile market segment with Socket FP8, while the Intel targets the desktop segment with Socket 1700. The Intel part has a known part number (SA4QK) and a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD's part number and MSRP are not recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the clock speed difference?

A: The AMD has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core 7 253PTE support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: What is the cache configuration on each?

A: The AMD has 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core, plus 16 MB shared L3. The Intel has 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core, plus 33 MB shared L3.

Q: Are the memory support options different?

A: Yes, the AMD supports only DDR5, while the Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 253PTE has a complete set of benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has none recorded. This means the Intel part holds a 100% win rate in the database. The most significant results from the Intel include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21276 and a single-core score of 3003. In Cinebench R20, the Intel scores 8935 multi-core and 1261 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 2144 multi-core and 302 single-core. PassMark tests reveal strong integer math performance at 119552, floating point math at 67209, and extended instructions at 17099. Data compression reaches 275828, while data encryption scores 15500. The PassMark multi-thread score is 25031, and the single-thread score is 3794. Physics performance is 1318, and random string sorting is 28227. The find prime numbers test yields 82.

The Intel's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The Intel Core i7-13800H scores 34988, just 0.1% higher than the Core 7 253PTE's average benchmark score of 34962. The Intel Core i9-12900HX scores 35003, also 0.1% higher. The Intel Xeon 6349P scores 34890, which is 0.2% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 5 150 scores 34881, also 0.2% lower. These narrow deltas place the Core 7 253PTE in a tightly contested performance bracket, with its average score sitting between these four comparable parts.

Given the absence of AMD benchmark data, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The Intel Core 7 253PTE's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21276 and PassMark multi-thread score of 25031 stand as the definitive multi-threaded performance figures. The single-core scores of 3003 in Cinebench R23 and 3794 in PassMark demonstrate that the Intel part also handles lightly threaded work well, likely due to its 5.40 GHz boost clock. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, with its 5.10 GHz boost clock, would presumably compete in single-threaded tests, but no data confirms this.

Specification Differences

The key specification differences between the two processors are clear. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE offers 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks differ substantially: 3.80 GHz for the AMD versus 1.80 GHz for the Intel. Boost clocks are closer, with the AMD at 5.10 GHz and the Intel at 5.40 GHz. The process node favors the AMD at 4 nm (TSMC) versus 10 nm (Intel). The AMD's die size is 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors, while the Intel has no recorded die size or transistor count. Cache configurations differ: the AMD uses 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core with 16 MB shared L3, while the Intel uses 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core with 33 MB shared L3. Memory support differs, with the AMD limited to DDR5 and the Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. PCIe capabilities differ: the AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD uses Radeon 780M, and the Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD, Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel. The AMD targets the mobile market, while the Intel targets the desktop market. The Intel has a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD has no recorded MSRP. The Intel has a part number of SA4QK, while the AMD's part number is unknown.