AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for this comparison is one-sided, with benchmark results available only for the Intel Core 7 253PE. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark scores in the database, which makes a direct numerical head-to-head impossible. The Intel Core 7 253PE posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880 and a single-core score of 3512. In Cinebench R20, the Intel chip reaches 10449 multi-core and 1475 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 2507 multi-core and 354 single-core.

The Intel Core 7 253PE also delivers strong PassMark results. Its multi-thread score is 29271, while single-thread performance sits at 3955. Integer math posts 114158, floating point math reaches 80870, and extended instructions score 21806. Data compression hits 339133, data encryption lands at 18385, and random string sorting records 32777. Physics processing scores 1845, and prime number finding counts 138.

Without any benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, the database shows zero wins for the AMD part and zero wins for the Intel part in the head-to-head field. The Intel Core 7 253PE holds a percentile rank of 87 against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40557. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0. The nearest rivals for the Intel part provide context: Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40585 with a delta of -0.1%, Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40518 with a delta of 0.1%, Intel Xeon 6357P scores 40630 with a delta of -0.2%, and AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40431 with a delta of 0.3%. These deltas show the Intel Core 7 253PE sits within a narrow band, essentially tied with its closest competitors.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly at the architectural level. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, while the Intel Core 7 253PE relies on the Bartlett Lake codename with no explicit architecture field recorded. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process node from TSMC, whereas the Intel chip uses a 10 nm node from Intel's own foundry. The AMD processor integrates 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, while the Intel chip has no transistor count or die size recorded.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 253PE offers 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clock speeds show the AMD part at 3.80 GHz versus 2.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks reverse the picture: the AMD chip reaches 5.10 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 5.50 GHz. The AMD processor has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel chip draws 65 watts.

Cache hierarchies diverge as well. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS carries 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 253PE packs 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support differs: AMD uses DDR5 only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both run dual-channel memory with identical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 7 253PE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics also differ: AMD pairs with Radeon 780M, Intel with UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part targets the mobile segment with an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip targets desktop with an Intel Socket 1700. Production status for both is Active.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data only covers the Intel Core 7 253PE, so the wins for that processor are direct and measurable. In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel chip shows strong throughput with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 29271. Single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3512 and PassMark single-thread score of 3955. Integer-heavy tasks, represented by PassMark integer math at 114158, indicate strong general-purpose compute capability. Floating point operations score 80870, and extended instructions reach 21806. Data compression at 339133 shows high efficiency for file archiving and compression workloads. Data encryption at 18385 suggests moderate cryptographic throughput.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark scores, so its wins cannot be quantified from the database. However, architectural data indicates where the AMD part may hold advantages based on design parameters. The 4 nm process node from TSMC provides a denser, more efficient transistor layout compared to Intel's 10 nm node. The 45 watt TDP for AMD versus 65 watts for Intel suggests lower power draw, which matters in embedded or thermally constrained environments. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics likely outperforms Intel's UHD Graphics 730 on graphical tasks, though no benchmark numbers confirm this. The higher base clock of 3.80 GHz for AMD may benefit latency-sensitive single-threaded workloads that do not boost as aggressively.

The Intel Core 7 253PE wins on raw core count with 10 cores versus 8, and thread count with 20 threads versus 16. It also wins on L3 cache size with 33 MB shared versus 16 MB, and L2 cache per core with 2 MB versus 1 MB. The Intel chip reaches a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz versus 5.10 GHz. The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5, which doubles the per-lane bandwidth of PCIe Gen 4 used by AMD. The Intel chip holds the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while AMD sits at the 50th percentile, though the AMD percentile is based on no benchmark entries.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS boosts up to 5.10 GHz, and the Intel Core 7 253PE boosts up to 5.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 253PE uses a 10 nm node from Intel.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 7 253PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has a TDP of 65 watts, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has an average benchmark score of 40557, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: Which processor supports a newer PCIe generation?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across multiple specification fields. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores, while the Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores. Thread counts are 16 for AMD and 20 for Intel. Base clock speeds stand at 3.80 GHz for AMD and 2.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.10 GHz for AMD and 5.50 GHz for Intel. TDP values are 45 watts for AMD and 65 watts for Intel.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD architecture is Zen 4 with the Hawk Point codename, while the Intel part uses the Bartlett Lake codename with no architecture field recorded. The process nodes differ: 4 nm from TSMC for AMD, 10 nm from Intel for the Intel chip. Transistor counts stand at 25,000 million for AMD, with no count for Intel. Die size is 178 mm² for AMD, with no size for Intel.

Cache layouts differ: AMD has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. Memory support shows AMD with DDR5 only and Intel with DDR4 and DDR5. PCIe configurations are Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 780M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. Market segments are Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD part has no recorded MSRP. The Intel part number is SA4QE, while the AMD part number is unknown.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core 7 253PE as the measurable performer. It delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880 and a single-core score of 3512, with an average benchmark score of 40557 and an 87th percentile rank against all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank, all of which indicate the database contains no verified performance data for that part.

The Intel Core 7 253PE wins on core count, thread count, boost clock, L3 cache size, PCIe generation, and memory flexibility. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD limits to DDR5. The Intel chip also offers PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, which the AMD part lacks. The Intel part has a higher TDP of 65 watts versus 45 watts, which reflects its higher core count and boost clock.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS holds advantages in process efficiency with a 4 nm node versus 10 nm, lower TDP, higher base clock, and more PCIe lanes. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics likely provides superior graphical performance compared to UHD Graphics 730, though no benchmark data confirms this. The AMD part targets mobile embedded applications, while the Intel chip targets desktop systems.

For users prioritizing verified multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, the Intel Core 7 253PE is the clear choice based on recorded scores. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and 33 MB of L3 cache, produce strong results across Cinebench and PassMark workloads. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS remains an unverified option in the database, with no benchmark evidence to support performance claims. The data supports selecting the Intel Core 7 253PE for workloads where measured throughput matters, while the AMD part may appeal to scenarios requiring lower power consumption and a smaller process node, though without numeric validation those advantages remain theoretical.