AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 251TE is the clear performance leader in this comparison. The database records a benchmark score of 41,650 for the Intel part, which places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This means the Intel processor holds every measurable performance advantage.

The Intel Core 7 251TE wins across all recorded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 25,518 points. In single-core, it records 3,602 points. The PassMark suite shows similarly dominant results: 125,739 in integer math, 85,607 in floating point math, 30,022 in multithread, and 3,568 in single-thread. The Intel part also records 334,399 in data compression and 22,176 in data encryption.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and no nearest rivals are listed. The data cannot confirm any workload where the AMD part wins. The Intel Core 7 251TE therefore takes every available benchmark category by default.

The use-case split is one-sided. For multi-threaded rendering, the Intel part delivers 25,518 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. For single-thread responsiveness, it delivers 3,602 in Cinebench R23 single-core. For general productivity, the PassMark multithread score of 30,022 and single-thread score of 3,568 both point to the same conclusion. The Intel Core 7 251TE is the only chip with measurable performance data, and that data is consistently strong.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design schools. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses Zen 4 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm process, under the Hawk Point codename. It belongs to the 8000 series and the Ryzen Embedded generation. The Intel Core 7 251TE uses Bartlett Lake on Intel's 10 nm process, belonging to the Core 7 generation.

Core counts differ sharply. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part has 24 cores and 32 threads. This 3x core count advantage and 2x thread count advantage explains much of the Intel part's multi-core dominance. The Intel chip also has a higher boost clock at 5.40 GHz versus 5.10 GHz for AMD. Base clocks tell a different story, with AMD at 3.80 GHz and Intel at 1.40 GHz, but boost behavior matters more for peak performance.

Cache configurations are also distinct. The AMD chip provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. Intel's larger per-core caches and more than double the L3 capacity support its higher core count and thread throughput.

The process nodes reflect different foundry choices. AMD uses TSMC at 4 nm with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. Intel uses its own foundry at 10 nm on a 215 mm² die. The Intel die is larger, and no transistor count is recorded for it in the database.

Memory support differs in flexibility. The AMD part supports DDR5 only, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and both record 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe generations differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 across 20 CPU lanes and Intel offering Gen 5 across 16 CPU lanes. Intel's PCIe Gen 5 support provides newer connectivity despite fewer lanes.

The integrated graphics also differ. AMD uses the Radeon 780M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The market segments differ as well, with AMD positioned as a Mobile processor and Intel as a Desktop processor. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part has a recorded part number, SRQAXQ5ZG, while the AMD part's part number is unknown. Both processors are locked, with no unlocked multiplier available on either.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE boosts to 5.40 GHz. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS boosts to 5.10 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core 7 251TE support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core 7 251TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a higher recorded benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has an average benchmark score of 41,650 and sits in the 88th percentile. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has an average benchmark score of zero and sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses TSMC's 4 nm process. The Intel Core 7 251TE uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS | Intel Core 7 251TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 24 |

| Threads | 16 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 1.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 25,000 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 178 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 36 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-04-01 | 2025-01-12 |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRQAXQ5ZG |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 41,650 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 88 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors. The head-to-head table is empty, and the win counts for both sides are zero. However, the Intel Core 7 251TE has a full set of individual benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has none.

The Cinebench R23 results for the Intel part are the most complete picture available. The multi-core score of 25,518 points indicates strong sustained throughput across all 24 cores. The single-core score of 3,602 points shows competitive per-thread performance as well. The Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern, with 10,717 in multi-core and 1,512 in single-core. The Cinebench R15 results record 2,572 in multi-core and 362 in single-core.

PassMark results for the Intel part cover a broad range of workloads. Integer math scores 125,739, floating point math scores 85,607, and extended instructions score 16,974. Data compression records 334,399, data encryption records 22,176, and random string sorting records 39,643. Find prime numbers scores 140, physics scores 1,938, and multithread scores 30,022. The single-thread score is 3,568.

The nearest rivals to the Intel Core 7 251TE provide context for its standing. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H scores 41,621, which is 0.1 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-14650HX scores 41,576, which is 0.2 percent behind. The Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41,779, which is 0.3 percent ahead. The Intel Core i7-14700T scores 41,914, which is 0.6 percent ahead. These deltas are all within one percentage point, placing the Intel Core 7 251TE in a tightly contested performance cluster.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmarks and no nearest rivals. Its percentile rank of 50 reflects the midpoint of the database, but without scores, no direct comparison to the Intel part is possible. The Intel part's 88th percentile rank and 41,650 average score stand as the only quantitative evidence in this matchup.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 7 251TE is the only processor in this comparison with recorded performance data, and that data is comprehensive. It delivers 25,518 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 3,602 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 30,022 in PassMark multithread. Its 88th percentile ranking places it among the stronger processors in the database, and its nearest rivals are all within one percentage point of its average score.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS brings architectural strengths that the data cannot quantify. It uses a smaller 4 nm process from TSMC, offers a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz, and includes Radeon 780M integrated graphics. It is positioned as a mobile processor with a 45 W TDP, matching the Intel part's 45 W TDP. Its 8 cores and 16 threads are fewer than the Intel part's 24 cores and 32 threads, and its 16 MB of L3 cache is less than half of Intel's 36 MB.

For buyers who need verified multi-threaded performance, the Intel Core 7 251TE is the data-backed choice. Its core count, cache size, and benchmark results all favor it. The AMD part may appeal in mobile contexts where its 4 nm efficiency and Radeon 780M graphics matter, but the database contains no benchmark evidence to support a performance claim. The recorded data points to the Intel Core 7 251TE for any workload where throughput, rendering, or general compute performance is the priority.