AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

# Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 201E demonstrates a clear advantage across every recorded benchmark in the database. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark entries in the current dataset, meaning all measured workloads favor the Intel part. The Intel Core 3 201E secures wins in rendering, single-threaded workloads, data compression, encryption, extended instruction sets, prime number calculations, floating point math, integer math, multithreaded tasks, physics simulations, random string sorting, and single-thread performance.

The Intel Core 3 201E posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12613, a strong result for a 4-core, 8-thread processor. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1780 indicates solid per-thread performance. In PassMark workloads, the processor delivers 164160 in data compression, 8931 in data encryption, 11035 in extended instructions, 33260 in floating point math, and 43894 in integer math. The multithreaded PassMark score reaches 14839, while the single-thread score sits at 3482. Physics simulation scores 1141, and random string sorting reaches 17783.

Since the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS lacks recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot assign it any wins. The head-to-head comparison field contains no entries, and the win counters show zero for both parts. The Intel Core 3 201E therefore stands as the only measured performer in this comparison, with all available data points derived from its benchmark suite.

The percentile placement reinforces the Intel part's standing. The Intel Core 3 201E ranks at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 19056. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19039 with a 0.1% delta, the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18982 with a 0.4% delta, and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18979 with a 0.4% delta. These close margins place the Intel Core 3 201E within a tightly packed performance cluster.

# Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS belongs to the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC and contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel foundries, with a die size of 163 mm². The process node difference indicates a substantial manufacturing gap between the two.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The AMD part offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part provides 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD processor doubles the thread count of its rival, which typically suggests an advantage in heavily parallel workloads. However, the recorded benchmark data does not include any scores for the AMD part, so this theoretical advantage remains unverified in the database.

Cache hierarchies show distinct configurations. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 201E uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part allocates more cache per core, while the AMD part provides a larger total L3 pool.

Memory support differs in scope. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory exclusively through a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory, a feature relevant for embedded and reliability-focused deployments.

PCIe connectivity separates the two as well. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 3 201E uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation, while the AMD part provides more lanes.

Clock speeds favor the AMD processor. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD processor runs at higher frequencies in both base and boost states. Thermal design power favors the AMD part as well, with a 45 W TDP compared to the Intel part's 60 W TDP.

The integrated graphics solutions differ. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS includes the Radeon 780M, while the Intel Core 3 201E includes the UHD Graphics 730. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment with an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor targets the desktop segment with an Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part released on 2024-04-01, while the Intel part released on 2025-01-12. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $134 and has the part number SRVTR. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark field in the database contains no entries, meaning no direct comparative measurements exist between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core 3 201E. Every recorded score belongs exclusively to the Intel Core 3 201E, so the analysis must rely on that processor's absolute scores and its position relative to other CPUs in the database.

The Intel Core 3 201E achieves its highest Cinebench result in the R23 multicore test with 12613 points. The R20 multicore score reaches 5297, and the R15 multicore score hits 1271. Single-core results follow a similar progression: 1780 in R23, 747 in R20, and 179 in R15. These scores establish a performance baseline for a 4-core, 8-thread processor operating at a 4.80 GHz boost clock.

PassMark workloads reveal the processor's strengths in specific computation types. The data compression score of 164160 is the highest PassMark result recorded, indicating efficient handling of compression algorithms. Integer math reaches 43894, floating point math reaches 33260, and extended instructions reach 11035. Data encryption scores 8931, random string sorting scores 17783, and find prime numbers scores 57. The multithreaded PassMark score of 14839 and the single-thread score of 3482 complete the suite. The physics score of 1141 rounds out the measured workloads.

The average benchmark score of 19056 places the Intel Core 3 201E at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, scores 19047 with a 0% delta, putting the two processors at virtual parity. The Intel Core i5-12400F trails by 0.1% with 19039 points. The Intel Core i5-1335U and AMD EPYC 7773X each score within 0.4% of the Intel Core 3 201E, at 18982 and 18979 respectively. These tight margins indicate that the Intel Core 3 201E sits in a competitive performance band, neither clearly ahead nor behind its closest alternatives.

# FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core 3 201E has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 memory exclusively, while the Intel Core 3 201E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and the Intel Core 3 201E has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19056, placing it at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: What PCIe generations do the processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the Intel Core 3 201E uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

# The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one conclusion: the Intel Core 3 201E is the sole measured performer in this comparison. Every benchmark score in the database belongs to the Intel part, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded results. The Intel Core 3 201E delivers a complete performance profile across rendering, computational math, compression, encryption, and single-threaded workloads. Its average benchmark score of 19056 and 73rd percentile ranking provide a concrete reference point for its capabilities.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS offers architectural advantages that remain unquantified in the database. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, higher clock speeds, a smaller 4 nm process node, higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s, and a lower 45 W TDP. These specifications suggest potential strengths in multi-threaded scenarios and power-constrained environments, but no benchmark data exists to confirm such performance.

The Intel Core 3 201E holds a distinct position among its nearest rivals. Its 0% delta against the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and 0.1% delta against the Intel Core i5-12400F show that it performs on par with established processors in its class. The 0.4% deltas against the Intel Core i5-1335U and AMD EPYC 7773X reinforce this consistency. For workloads matching the recorded benchmark suite, the Intel Core 3 201E delivers measurable performance.

Selection between these two processors depends entirely on the availability of benchmark data for the AMD part. The database currently records no scores for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, leaving its performance unverified. The Intel Core 3 201E provides the only empirically supported option in this comparison, with a full suite of 17 benchmark results across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and PassMark tests.

# Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Hawk Point codename, while the Intel Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename without a stated architecture. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,000 million transistors, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process at Intel with no transistor count recorded.

Core configuration differs: the AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, the Intel part has 4 cores and 8 threads. Clock speeds favor the AMD part at 3.80 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost, compared to 3.60 GHz and 4.80 GHz for the Intel part. TDP favors the AMD part at 45 W versus 60 W for the Intel part. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8 and targets the mobile segment, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop segment.

Cache configurations differ per core and in total. The AMD part uses 64 KB L1, 1 MB L2, and 16 MB shared L3. The Intel part uses 80 KB L1, 1.25 MB L2, and 12 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: the AMD part uses DDR5 only, the Intel part uses DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth favors the AMD part at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. PCIe differs: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes, the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 780M on the AMD part, UHD Graphics 730 on the Intel part. Release dates differ: 2024-04-01 for the AMD part, 2025-01-12 for the Intel part. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $134 and part number SRVTR; the AMD part has no recorded MSRP or part number.