AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for this comparison is one-sided. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark entries in the database, while the Intel Core i9-14901E carries a full set of Cinebench and PassMark scores. This absence means the head-to-head comparison cannot be expressed as direct score deltas between the two. Instead, the Intel part’s results can be positioned against its own nearest rivals, which gives context for where the Core i9-14901E stands. The Intel processor achieves an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest competitor, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, scores 37904, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943, which is 0.1 percent higher than the Intel part. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, a 0.2 percent deficit, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, a 0.3 percent deficit.

Looking at the Intel part’s individual scores, Cinebench R15 multicore reaches 2595, while single-core hits 366. Cinebench R20 shows 10816 multicore and 1526 single-core. Cinebench R23 records 25753 multicore and 3635 single-core. These figures indicate a strong desktop performer, particularly in multi-threaded workloads where the 8-core, 16-thread configuration produces substantial throughput. The PassMark suite reinforces this: multithread score is 30298, single-thread is 4354, integer math hits 112736, floating point math reaches 81089, and extended instructions score 17249. Data compression scores 288777, data encryption scores 18571, and random string sorting scores 39138. Physics testing yields 3041, and find prime numbers records 189. The Intel part’s percentile ranking of 86 outpaces its nearest rivals, all of which cluster within a 0.3 percent band. The data suggests the Core i9-14901E sits at the top of its immediate competitive group, but the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 cannot be compared directly due to missing measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in design philosophy. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses a 16-core, 32-thread layout built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Halo. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size listed as 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core i9-14901E uses 8 cores and 16 threads on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and is produced on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its die size is 257 mm². The core count difference is the most obvious architectural gap: the AMD part offers double the cores and threads of the Intel part. Cache hierarchies also differ. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip’s larger L3 pool may benefit workloads with high data reuse, while the Intel chip’s larger per-core L2 could help latency-sensitive single-thread tasks.

Memory support separates the two further. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, yielding 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core i9-14901E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD part’s quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration suggests a focus on memory-intensive integrated graphics and compute tasks. Both processors support ECC memory, an important feature for reliability-sensitive environments. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip’s newer PCIe generation offers higher potential transfer rates for compatible devices.

Integrated graphics present another divide. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 includes a Radeon 8065S, while the Intel Core i9-14901E pairs with UHD Graphics 770. The AMD solution is positioned as a larger integrated graphics block, consistent with the quad-channel memory design. Socket and platform targets differ as well. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP11 and is classified as a mobile segment part, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop segment part. The AMD part’s release date is recorded as May 19, 2026, whereas the Intel part’s release date is June 30, 2024. Both processors have a locked multiplier, meaning overclocking is not supported. The AMD part’s TDP is 55 watts, while the Intel part’s TDP is 65 watts. The AMD part’s base clock is 3.10 GHz with a boost of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part’s base clock is 2.80 GHz with a boost of 5.60 GHz. The Intel chip boosts higher, but the AMD chip starts from a higher base frequency.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD part doubles the core and thread counts of the Intel part.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E boosts to 5.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 boosts to 5.20 GHz. The Intel part has a 0.40 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i9-14901E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth value recorded.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core i9-14901E have ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14901E is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E is in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37911. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, so no percentile ranking is available for it.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications reveal several clear differences between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14901E uses 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clock differs: 3.10 GHz for the AMD part versus 2.80 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clock also differs: 5.20 GHz for the AMD part versus 5.60 GHz for the Intel part. TDP is rated at 55 watts for the AMD part and 65 watts for the Intel part. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node separates the two: 4 nm for the AMD part versus 10 nm for the Intel part. Foundry differs as well, with TSMC producing the AMD chip and Intel producing its own. Die size is recorded as 2x 70.6 mm² for the AMD part and 257 mm² for the Intel part. L2 cache is 1 MB per core for the AMD part and 2 MB per core for the Intel part. L3 cache is 64 MB for the AMD part and 36 MB shared for the Intel part. Memory support differs: LPDDR5X for the AMD part versus DDR4 and DDR5 for the Intel part. Memory bus width differs: quad-channel for the AMD part versus dual-channel for the Intel part. Memory bandwidth is 273.1 GB/s for the AMD part, with no value recorded for the Intel part.

PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 for the AMD part versus Gen 5 for the Intel part, both with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 8065S for the AMD part versus UHD Graphics 770 for the Intel part. Market segment differs: mobile for the AMD part versus desktop for the Intel part. Release dates differ: May 19, 2026 for the AMD part versus June 30, 2024 for the Intel part. Part numbers differ: 100-000002124 for the AMD part versus Q49ESRNJH for the Intel part. Both processors have locked multipliers and ECC support. The AMD part’s generation is listed as Ryzen AI Max+ PRO (Zen 5), while the Intel part’s generation is Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh).

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-14901E wins on measurable benchmark performance because it is the only one of the two with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 and single-core score of 3635 indicate strong all-around compute. The PassMark multithread score of 30298 and integer math score of 112736 point to solid throughput in general-purpose desktop workloads. The Intel part’s 86th percentile ranking and average score of 37911 place it slightly above its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with a 0 percent delta and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with a 0.1 percent higher score. The Intel part also holds advantages in boost clock at 5.60 GHz and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 wins on architectural features that the data supports. It has double the cores and threads, which could translate to higher multi-threaded capacity in workloads that scale with core count. Its 64 MB L3 cache is nearly double the Intel part’s 36 MB. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth is a substantial advantage for memory-bound tasks and integrated graphics performance. The Radeon 8065S integrated GPU is a different class of integrated graphics compared to UHD Graphics 770, and the 4 nm process at TSMC suggests better power efficiency per transistor. The AMD part’s lower TDP of 55 watts versus 65 watts for the Intel part indicates a more power-conscious design.

The Intel part wins in platform maturity and raw clock speed. The 5.60 GHz boost clock is the highest recorded between the two. The desktop segment classification and Socket 1700 compatibility position it for traditional desktop builds. The AMD part wins in memory bandwidth and core density. The 273.1 GB/s bandwidth figure is a recorded advantage that the Intel part cannot match. The mobile segment classification and FP11 socket indicate a different use case, likely focused on high-bandwidth integrated graphics and portable systems.

The Verdict

The data presents an incomplete but informative picture. The Intel Core i9-14901E has a full benchmark profile and a clear percentile ranking of 86, with an average score of 37911. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3 percent, which shows a tight competitive cluster. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmarks, so its performance cannot be quantified against the Intel part. What can be stated from the specifications is that the AMD processor targets a different design space: 16 cores, 32 threads, 64 MB L3 cache, quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 273.1 GB/s, and a Radeon 8065S integrated GPU. The Intel processor targets a more conventional desktop role with 8 cores, 16 threads, 36 MB L3 cache, dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, and UHD Graphics 770.

For users who prioritize measured performance, the Intel Core i9-14901E is the only option with data. Its 86th percentile standing and average score of 37911 confirm it performs at a high level relative to other CPUs. For users who prioritize core count, cache size, memory bandwidth, and integrated graphics capability, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has the specification advantage. The choice between the two depends on which factors matter more: verified benchmark results or architectural features. The Intel part has a higher boost clock at 5.60 GHz and PCIe Gen 5 support. The AMD part has a higher base clock at 3.10 GHz, lower TDP at 55 watts, and a smaller process node at 4 nm. The Intel part is a desktop processor released in June 2024. The AMD part is a mobile processor released in May 2026. Both support ECC memory and have locked multipliers. Without benchmark scores for the AMD part, the database cannot assign a performance winner. The specification sheet favors the AMD part in core count, cache, memory bandwidth, and integrated graphics. The benchmark sheet favors the Intel part, which is the only one with recorded performance data.