AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and Intel Core i7-14650HX are both 16-core mobile processors, but they approach that core count from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD part is a monolithic, high-bandwidth Zen 5 chip built for AI-heavy workloads, while the Intel part is a hybrid Raptor Lake-HX Refresh design with performance and efficiency cores. The recorded data shows the Intel chip holds a substantial lead in measured benchmark scores, with an average score of 41,576 compared to the AMD chip’s 0 recorded average score, and an 88th percentile ranking against all CPUs versus the AMD chip’s 50th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data available for the Intel Core i7-14650HX provides a detailed picture of its performance across a range of workloads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This means the analysis of workload wins is entirely one-sided, based on the Intel chip’s measured results.

The Intel chip shows particular strength in multi-threaded and integer-heavy tasks. Its PassMark integer math score of 116,661 and floating point math score of 84,999 indicate a strong general-purpose compute capability. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,454 and Geekbench multicore score of 14,249 confirm that the chip scales well across its 24 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 33,495 further supports this, showing the hybrid architecture delivers substantial parallel throughput.

For single-threaded performance, the Intel chip records a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,969 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,173. These numbers place it in a competitive range for single-thread responsiveness. The PassMark single thread score of 3,841 aligns with these results, indicating consistent single-core behavior across different test methodologies.

The data also shows specific workload strengths for the Intel chip. The PassMark data compression score of 398,418 is a notable outlier, suggesting strong performance in compression and decompression tasks. The random string sorting score of 43,035 and extended instructions score of 24,150 indicate solid handling of sorting algorithms and SIMD-heavy code. The physics score of 2,202, while lower in absolute terms, still represents a measurable result for that specific test.

The AMD chip’s absence from the benchmark database means there is no recorded data to indicate where it would win. Its architecture, with 32 threads and a 64 MB L3 cache, suggests potential strength in heavily threaded scenarios, but without measured scores, the database cannot confirm any specific workload advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ substantially in their underlying design. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO (Zen 5) generation. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size listed as 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core i7-14650HX belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake-HX codename, and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 257 mm².

Core counts are identical at 16, but thread counts differ. The AMD chip supports 32 threads, meaning all 16 cores are multithreaded. The Intel chip supports 24 threads, indicating a hybrid layout with a mix of performance and efficiency cores. Both chips have a base clock of 3.10 GHz for AMD and 2.20 GHz for Intel, with both boosting to 5.20 GHz.

Cache configuration differs significantly. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with a large 64 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 per core but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core, while its L3 is 30 MB shared. The smaller L3 on the Intel part is offset by the larger per-core L2, which can benefit certain workloads.

Memory support is another major divergence. The AMD chip uses LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus, delivering 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, and its bandwidth is not listed in the database. This bandwidth difference is substantial and likely impacts memory-sensitive workloads.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU only, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU only. Integrated graphics differ as well, with the AMD chip featuring a Radeon 8065S and the Intel chip featuring UHD Graphics 710. Both chips support ECC memory and have a TDP of 55 watts. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1964. The Intel multiplier is unlocked, while the AMD multiplier is locked. The release dates show the Intel chip from 2024-01-07 and the AMD chip from 2026-05-19.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 32 threads across its 16 cores, while the Intel Core i7-14650HX has 24 threads across its 16 cores, indicating a hybrid core layout for the Intel part.

Q: How do the cache sizes compare?

A: The AMD chip has 1 MB L2 per core and a 64 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip has 2 MB L2 per core and a 30 MB shared L3 cache. Both have 80 KB L1 per core.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD chip supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has an average benchmark score of 41,576 and ranks in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark score and ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-14650HX has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a locked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on several recorded specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 32 threads compared to the Intel Core i7-14650HX’s 24 threads. Base clock differs, with AMD at 3.10 GHz and Intel at 2.20 GHz, while boost clocks match at 5.20 GHz. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm process from Intel. Die size differs, with AMD at 2x 70.6 mm² and Intel at 257 mm².

Cache layout differs in L2 and L3. AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 64 MB L3, while Intel has 2 MB L2 per core and 30 MB L3. Memory support differs, with AMD using LPDDR5X on a quad-channel bus at 273.1 GB/s, and Intel using DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus. PCIe generation differs, with AMD at Gen 4 and Intel at Gen 5, both with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ, with AMD featuring Radeon 8065S and Intel featuring UHD Graphics 710. Sockets differ, with AMD using FP11 and Intel using BGA 1964. The AMD chip has a locked multiplier, while the Intel chip is unlocked. Release dates differ, with the Intel chip released on 2024-01-07 and the AMD chip on 2026-05-19. The Intel part number is SRMXH, while the AMD part number is 100-000002124.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark results are recorded in the database for these two processors. The only available benchmark data belongs to the Intel Core i7-14650HX, which has a full suite of Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark scores. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark scores, so no direct comparison can be made from the database.

The Intel chip’s recorded scores provide its performance profile. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,470.5 multicore and 285.5 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 11,946 multicore and 1,686 single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20,454 multicore and 1,969 single-core. Geekbench results show 14,249 multicore and 2,173 single-core.

PassMark results show a wide range of workload-specific scores. The data compression score of 398,418 stands out as the highest recorded result. Integer math scores 116,661, floating point math scores 84,999, and extended instructions score 24,150. The multithread score is 33,495, while the single thread score is 3,841. Random string sorting scores 43,035, data encryption scores 22,917, and physics scores 2,202. The find prime numbers score is 152.

The nearest rivals for the Intel chip, based on average benchmark score, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H at 41,621 with a delta of -0.1 percent, the Intel Core 7 251TE at 41,650 with a delta of -0.2 percent, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41,376 with a delta of 0.5 percent, and the Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41,779 with a delta of -0.5 percent. These deltas show the Intel Core i7-14650HX sits within a narrow band of performance around these comparable processors.

The Verdict

The database contains substantial benchmark data for the Intel Core i7-14650HX and no recorded benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495. This makes a direct performance verdict impossible from measured results. The Intel chip’s average score of 41,576 and 88th percentile ranking place it among higher-performing CPUs in the database, with its nearest rivals all within a 0.5 percent delta of its score.

The AMD chip’s specifications suggest a different design focus. Its 32 threads, 64 MB L3 cache, and quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 273.1 GB/s point toward memory bandwidth-heavy and highly threaded workloads. Its 2026 release date and 4 nm process indicate a newer manufacturing generation. However, without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how these specifications translate into measured performance.

For users selecting between these two based on recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14650HX offers verified performance across a broad range of tests, with particular strength in compression, integer math, and multithreaded scenarios. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 offers a distinct specification set with higher thread count, larger L3 cache, and significantly higher memory bandwidth, but its performance remains unmeasured in the database. The choice between them depends on whether verified benchmark results or architectural specifications carry more weight for a given use case.