AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i7-14700HX Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core i7-14700HX are both mobile processors aimed at high-performance laptops, but they approach the task from different design philosophies. The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses a 16-core, 32-thread configuration built on a 4 nm process, while the Core i7-14700HX uses a 20-core, 28-thread hybrid layout on a 10 nm process. The recorded data shows a clear split in performance characteristics, with the Intel part dominating in most measured benchmarks and the AMD part offering a different feature set. This analysis walks through the benchmark results, architectural differences, and specification gaps between the two.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark database contains a full suite of results for the Intel Core i7-14700HX, but no recorded scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495. This means the direct comparison relies entirely on the Intel side’s measurements, with the AMD part’s capabilities inferred from its listed specifications. The Intel Core i7-14700HX wins every benchmark category where data exists, including Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark tests. Its percentile ranking of 89 against all CPUs indicates it sits well above the median, while the AMD part has a percentile of 50, suggesting a mid-pack position in the database’s overall distribution.

Focusing on the Intel part’s wins, the multi-core tests show its strength. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 24595, which places it ahead of many desktop-class processors. The single-core scores are also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2103 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2116. For the AMD part, the lack of benchmark data means no direct win can be assigned, but its specifications point to different strengths. The AMD part has a 64 MB L3 cache, compared to Intel’s 33 MB, and a quad-channel memory bus with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth, which could benefit memory-intensive workloads if benchmarked.

The use-case split from the available data favors the Intel part for tasks that rely on raw multi-threaded throughput. The PassMark multithread score of 36566 and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13059 both indicate strong parallel performance. For single-threaded workloads, the Intel part also leads, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3947. The AMD part’s potential advantages would likely appear in scenarios involving large data sets or memory bandwidth, given its larger cache and faster memory interface, but those are not directly measured in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use distinct architectures. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is based on the Zen 5 core design, codenamed Gorgon Halo, and is part of the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO generation. It uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, with a die size listed as 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core i7-14700HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX refresh, on a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The process node difference is substantial, with AMD’s 4 nm process offering a smaller feature size compared to Intel’s 10 nm.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The AMD part has 16 cores and 32 threads, all presumably using the same Zen 5 cores. The Intel part has 20 cores and 28 threads, which reflects its hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the core type split. The base clock for the AMD part is 3.10 GHz, while the Intel part has a lower base clock of 2.10 GHz. The boost clock favors Intel, with 5.50 GHz versus AMD’s 5.20 GHz.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is a major difference: AMD provides 64 MB total, while Intel offers 33 MB shared. This larger L3 cache on the AMD side could help with frequently accessed data, but the Intel part’s higher boost clock and greater core count may compensate in many workloads.

The memory support is another key difference. The AMD part supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both parts support ECC memory. The PCIe interface also differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part’s PCIe Gen 5 support offers higher potential data transfer rates for compatible devices.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part includes a Radeon 8065S, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 770. The database does not provide performance scores for either iGPU, so the comparison is limited to their existence. The AMD part’s socket is AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1964. The release dates are far apart, with the Intel part launching on 2024-01-07 and the AMD part on 2026-05-19.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14700HX is the stronger performer in every benchmark category where measurements exist. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24595 and Geekbench multi-core score of 14390 put it well ahead of typical mobile processors, and its percentile of 89 confirms its high standing. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its performance cannot be directly compared. The database lists its percentile as 50, which suggests it sits near the middle of all CPUs, but this is not based on any measured test in the pack.

For users who prioritize raw compute performance, the Intel part is the clear choice from the available data. Its 20 cores, 28 threads, and 5.50 GHz boost clock deliver strong multi-threaded and single-threaded results. The AMD part offers features that could be valuable in specific contexts, such as a 64 MB L3 cache and quad-channel memory with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth, but these do not translate into measured wins without benchmark data. The AMD part also has a later release date, indicating it is a newer design, but the database does not provide performance evidence to support a recommendation.

The data shows that the Intel part’s strengths are quantifiable, while the AMD part’s advantages remain speculative. For workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, or software compilation, the Intel part’s multi-core scores indicate it would handle these tasks efficiently. For memory-heavy operations, the AMD part’s memory bandwidth could be a factor, but no test confirms this. The verdict from the data is that the Intel Core i7-14700HX is the proven performer, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 awaits benchmark validation.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel part has more physical cores, but the AMD part has more threads due to its 32-thread count.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part’s higher boost clock may provide an advantage in single-threaded tasks.

Q: How does the L3 cache compare between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 64 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core i7-14700HX has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part’s larger L3 cache could improve performance in workloads with large working sets.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus. The Intel Core i7-14700HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus. Both support ECC memory.

Q: What are the release dates for these processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX was released on 2024-01-07, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a release date of 2026-05-19. The AMD part is a later release.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has a percentile of 89 against all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a percentile of 50. This indicates the Intel part ranks higher in the database’s overall distribution.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison is limited to the Intel Core i7-14700HX’s results. The Intel part’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 3812, and its single-core score is 296. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 13059 and the single-core score is 1843. The Cinebench R23 results show a multi-core score of 24595 and a single-core score of 2103. These scores indicate strong performance across rendering workloads.

In Geekbench, the Intel part scores 14390 multi-core and 2116 single-core. The PassMark suite provides a broader picture. The multithread score is 36566, with a single-thread score of 3947. The integer math score is 131296, and the floating point math score is 93836. The extended instructions score is 25718, and the data encryption score is 26092. The data compression score is 438539, and the random string sorting score is 48544. The find prime numbers score is 165, and the physics score is 2252.

The biggest wins for the Intel part come in multi-threaded tests. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24595 is notably high, and the PassMark multithread score of 36566 confirms this trend. The single-core scores are also solid, with the Geekbench single-core score of 2116 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3947. The nearest rivals for the Intel part, based on the database, include the AMD EPYC 7303 with an average score of 45960 and a delta of 0%, the AMD EPYC 4364P with 45970 and 0%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 with 46030 and -0.2%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 with 46062 and -0.2%. These rivals are close in average score, indicating the Intel part sits in a competitive performance band.

Specification Differences

The specifications where the two parts differ are numerous. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads. The base clock is 3.10 GHz for AMD and 2.10 GHz for Intel. The boost clock is 5.20 GHz for AMD and 5.50 GHz for Intel. The TDP is 55 for both parts.

The sockets differ: AMD uses AMD Socket FP11, while Intel uses Intel BGA 1964. The process node is 4 nm for AMD (TSMC) and 10 nm for Intel. The die size is 2x 70.6 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core for both, but the L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 64 MB for AMD and 33 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support differs, with AMD using LPDDR5X and a quad-channel bus, while Intel uses DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus. The memory bandwidth is 273.1 GB/s for AMD, with no figure listed for Intel. Both support ECC memory. The PCIe version is Gen 4 for AMD and Gen 5 for Intel, both with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are Radeon 8065S for AMD and UHD Graphics 770 for Intel.

The release dates are 2026-05-19 for AMD and 2024-01-07 for Intel. The multiplier unlocked status is false for AMD and true for Intel, meaning the Intel part allows overclocking. The part numbers are 100-000002124 for AMD and SRMXG for Intel. The production status is Active for both. The AMD part has a generation of Ryzen AI Max+ PRO (Zen 5), while the Intel part has a generation of Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh).