AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i5-14500 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 contains no benchmark scores, while the Intel Core i5-14500 shows a full suite of measured results across multiple test families. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible for the AMD part. However, the database does provide enough information to assess the Intel processor on its own merits and to project how the AMD chip may perform based on its architectural attributes.

Where the Intel Core i5-14500 has recorded data, the results are consistent across Cinebench and Geekbench. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14500 scores 15012 points in the multicore test and 1917 points in the single-core test. The R20 run shows 10985 multicore and 1550 single-core, while the older R15 test shows 2435 multicore and 273 single-core. Geekbench results indicate 13390 for multicore and 2099 for single-core. These figures place the i5-14500 at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 38531.

The nearest rivals for the Intel part in the database are tightly clustered. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38561, a delta of -0.1 percent relative to the i5-14500. The Intel Xeon w3-2525 scores 38392, a delta of 0.4 percent. The Intel Core 9 270H scores 38335, a delta of 0.5 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H scores 38312, a delta of 0.6 percent. These margins are remarkably small, indicating that the i5-14500 sits in a crowded performance tier where the differences between adjacent parts are measured in fractions of a percent.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 carries a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 in the database. That zero reflects missing measurements rather than a literal performance result. The architectural data suggests the AMD part should not be dismissed on that basis. It uses 16 cores and 32 threads, compared to 14 cores and 20 threads for the Intel part. The AMD base clock sits at 3.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel part runs at 2.60 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. The AMD chip also features a 64 MB shared L3 cache, versus 24 MB for the Intel chip. The memory bandwidth differential is substantial as well: 273.1 GB/s for the AMD part versus no recorded bandwidth figure for the Intel part.

In the absence of AMD benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison must rest on what the database does contain. The Intel part has measurable results and a clear percentile standing. The AMD part has structural advantages that the recorded data cannot yet confirm or refute.

The Verdict

The database presents an asymmetric picture. The Intel Core i5-14500 has a complete set of benchmark results, a 86th percentile placement, and an average score of 38531. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark entries and sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, which is an artifact of missing data rather than a true performance measure.

Buyers who require verified, repeatable results should look at the Intel part. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15012 and Geekbench multicore score of 13390 are concrete data points. Its nearest rivals all land within 0.6 percent of its average score, which means the i5-14500 is a known quantity in a stable performance envelope. The AMD part, by contrast, has no measured scores in the database. The architectural specifications look promising, with more cores, more threads, higher clocks, and larger cache, but the absence of benchmark data prevents any definitive performance claim.

The AMD part targets a different market segment. The database lists it as a mobile processor with a 55 W TDP, an AMD Socket FP11, and integrated Radeon 8065S graphics. The Intel part is a desktop processor with a 65 W TDP, an Intel Socket 1700, and UHD Graphics 770. These are different tools for different use cases. The Intel part is a mainstream desktop chip with a proven track record. The AMD part is a mobile flagship with specifications that suggest high performance, but the data cannot confirm it.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500 wins in every category where the database has actual measurements. Its Cinebench R15 single-core score of 273 and multicore score of 2435 establish a baseline. Its Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1550 and multicore score of 10985 show scaling across thread counts. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1917 and multicore score of 15012 indicate strong performance in modern rendering workloads. Its Geekbench single-core score of 2099 and multicore score of 13390 confirm the pattern. PassMark results add further detail: 30777 in multithread, 3952 in single-thread, 108124 in integer math, 79576 in floating-point math, 21457 in data encryption, and 371294 in data compression.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 wins in the architectural comparison. It has 16 cores versus 14 for the Intel part. It has 32 threads versus 20. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz exceeds the Intel part's 5.00 GHz. Its L3 cache of 64 MB is more than double the Intel part's 24 MB. Its quad-channel LPDDR5X memory support and 273.1 GB/s memory bandwidth dwarf the Intel part's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 configuration, for which no bandwidth figure is recorded. The AMD part also uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm node from Intel. The AMD die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², while the Intel die is 215 mm².

The Intel part wins on PCIe generation. It supports Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part supports Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Both parts have locked multipliers, so overclocking is not an option for either. Both support ECC memory. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core i5-14500 has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for both processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 boosts to 5.20 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14500 boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14500 has 24 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14500?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500 has an average benchmark score of 38531 and sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The AMD part has an empty benchmarks array, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking in the database.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500 supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO generation built on Zen 5. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², indicating a chiplet or multi-die arrangement. The Intel Core i5-14500 uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel with a monolithic die of 215 mm².

The AMD part uses a quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses a dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 interface, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory, which is notable for workstation and server-adjacent workloads.

The cache hierarchies differ in structure. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. The AMD L3 cache is 64 MB and appears to be shared across the entire chip. The Intel L3 cache is 24 MB and is listed as shared.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part uses a Radeon 8065S, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The database does not include benchmark scores for either iGPU, so no performance comparison is possible.

The market segments differ sharply. The AMD part is listed as mobile, uses AMD Socket FP11, and has a TDP of 55 W. The Intel part is listed as desktop, uses Intel Socket 1700, and has a TDP of 65 W. The AMD part has a release date of 2026-05-19, while the Intel part has a release date of 2024-01-07. The AMD part number is 100-000002124, and the Intel part number is SRN3T.

Specification Differences

The processors differ across nearly every primary specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core i5-14500 has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD base clock is 3.10 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz. The Intel base clock is 2.60 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz. The AMD TDP is 55 W, and the Intel TDP is 65 W.

The sockets are incompatible. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP11, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The process nodes differ: 4 nm at TSMC for the AMD part, 10 nm at Intel for the Intel part. The AMD die size is 2x 70.6 mm², and the Intel die size is 215 mm².

Memory support diverges. The AMD part supports LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Both have locked multipliers, so neither supports unlocked overclocking.

The integrated graphics are different: Radeon 8065S on the AMD part, UHD Graphics 770 on the Intel part. The market segment is mobile for the AMD part and desktop for the Intel part. The production status for both is Active. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The release dates are 2026-05-19 for the AMD part and 2024-01-07 for the Intel part.