AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 versus the Intel Core i3-14100F. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. This means a side-by-side comparison of specific test scores cannot be drawn from the recorded data.

However, the Intel Core i3-14100F has a substantial set of recorded benchmark scores across multiple test suites, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no individual benchmark entries. The Intel processor's average benchmark score is 18,519, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The AMD processor holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of zero, reflecting the absence of recorded test data.

For the Intel Core i3-14100F specifically, the Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 1,318, and the single-core score is 186. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 5,495, with a single-core score of 775. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 13,084, while the single-core score is 1,847. Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 7,598 and a single-core score of 2,105.

PassMark tests for the Intel processor show a multi-thread score of 15,420 and a single-thread score of 3,778. Data compression scores reach 176,106, while data encryption records 8,922. Extended instructions produce a score of 11,984, and finding prime numbers yields 61. Floating point math scores 35,370, integer math scores 45,357, physics scores 1,077, and random string sorting scores 17,596.

Without any recorded benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495, the data cannot support a comparative performance analysis between these two processors. The Intel part's scores stand alone in the database, and no delta percentages exist for a direct matchup.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The benchmarks field for the AMD processor is empty, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: What is the Intel Core i3-14100F's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has an average benchmark score of 18,519 and sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495's percentile ranking compare to the Intel Core i3-14100F?

A: The AMD processor ranks at the 50th percentile, while the Intel processor ranks at the 72nd percentile. This indicates the Intel part sits higher in the overall distribution of CPU performance in the database.

Q: What are the closest rivals to the Intel Core i3-14100F according to the database?

A: The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-13420H with an average score of 18,511 and a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE with 18,505 and a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core i3-13100 with 18,380 and a delta of 0.8%, and the Intel Core 7 360 with 18,374 and a delta of 0.8%.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 have any nearest rivals listed?

A: No. The nearest rivals field for the AMD processor is empty.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel Core i3-14100F?

A: The launch MSRP is $109.

The Verdict

The data presents an incomplete comparison. The Intel Core i3-14100F has a full set of benchmark measurements, an average score of 18,519, and a 72nd percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking based on an average score of zero.

For users who require verified performance data, the Intel Core i3-14100F is the only option with measurable results in the database. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,084 and Geekbench multi-core score of 7,598 provide concrete reference points. The AMD processor's lack of any recorded scores means no performance claims can be substantiated from the database.

The Intel part also holds a higher percentile position, suggesting that within the database's population of CPUs, it outperforms a larger share of processors. The AMD processor's 50th percentile ranking, despite having no test results, places it at the median of the distribution, but this ranking carries no evidentiary support from actual benchmarks.

Users who prioritize a processor with documented, verifiable performance across multiple test suites should select the Intel Core i3-14100F. Users who require the AMD processor's specific feature set, such as its integrated Radeon 8065S graphics or its mobile market segment positioning, will need to rely on the processor's specifications rather than benchmark data, as none exists in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification category. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i3-14100F uses 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD processor has a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, whereas the Intel processor has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Thermal design power differs slightly, with the AMD part rated at 55 watts and the Intel part at 58 watts. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The process nodes differ substantially: the AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Cache configurations diverge. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The die sizes also differ, with the AMD part measuring 2x 70.6 mm² and the Intel part measuring 163 mm².

Memory support varies. The AMD processor supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and no recorded memory bandwidth figure. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe specifications differ: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD processor includes integrated Radeon 8065S graphics, while the Intel processor has no integrated graphics (N/A). The AMD part is a mobile processor, while the Intel part is a desktop processor.

Release dates differ, with the AMD processor released on May 19, 2026, and the Intel processor released on January 7, 2024. The AMD processor has no launch MSRP recorded, while the Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $109. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000002124, and the Intel part number is SRMX2.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO generation based on Zen 5 architecture. The Intel Core i3-14100F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core i3 generation based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh.

The manufacturing processes are distinct. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel processor is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. This process difference correlates with the die size disparity: the AMD part uses two dies measuring 70.6 mm² each, while the Intel part uses a single die measuring 163 mm².

Core architecture differs significantly. The AMD processor offers 16 cores and 32 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading across all cores. The Intel processor offers 4 cores and 8 threads, also with multithreading but at a much smaller scale. The AMD processor's 64 MB of L3 cache provides a large shared cache pool, whereas the Intel processor's 12 MB of shared L3 cache is considerably smaller.

The AMD processor's quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth reflects its mobile-oriented design, optimized for integrated memory controllers with high throughput. The Intel processor's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 interface serves desktop applications where memory is installed separately on the motherboard.

The AMD processor integrates Radeon 8065S graphics, making it a complete system-on-chip solution for mobile devices. The Intel processor has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for any display output. The AMD processor also uses a different PCIe generation (Gen 4) compared to the Intel processor (Gen 5), though both provide 16 CPU-only lanes.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core i3-14100F wins in every measurable benchmark category because it is the only processor with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,084 and single-core score of 1,847, along with its Geekbench multi-core score of 7,598 and single-core score of 2,105, represent the only performance data available for comparison.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 wins in no benchmark categories, as no scores exist in the database. Its specification sheet suggests advantages in core count (16 versus 4), thread count (32 versus 8), boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 4.70 GHz), L3 cache size (64 MB versus 12 MB), and memory bandwidth (273.1 GB/s versus no recorded figure). However, these specifications do not translate into recorded benchmark wins.

For use cases requiring documented multi-threaded performance, the Intel processor's PassMark multi-thread score of 15,420 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5,495 provide reference points. For single-threaded workloads, the Intel processor's PassMark single-thread score of 3,778 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,847 indicate its capabilities.

The AMD processor, based on specifications alone, targets mobile platforms with integrated graphics and high memory bandwidth. The Intel processor targets desktop platforms with PCIe Gen 5 support and no integrated graphics. Users selecting between these processors must choose between a processor with verified benchmark performance (Intel) and one with no recorded performance data but a stronger specification sheet on paper (AMD). The database's percentiles favor the Intel processor at 72% versus the AMD processor at 50%, but this ranking for the AMD part is based on an average score of zero.