AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495

CORE STATE Gorgon Halo
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Halo
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 253PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,507
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
354
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,449
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,475
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
24,880
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,512
passmark_data_compression
N/A
339,133
passmark_data_encryption
N/A
18,385
passmark_extended_instructions
N/A
21,806
passmark_find_prime_numbers
N/A
138
passmark_floating_point_math
N/A
80,870
passmark_integer_math
N/A
114,158
passmark_multithread
N/A
29,271
passmark_physics
N/A
1,845
passmark_random_string_sorting
N/A
32,777
passmark_single_thread
N/A
3,955
passmark_singlethread
N/A
3,955

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core 7 253PE

The Verdict

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core 7 253PE, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark scores. The Intel part sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 40557. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40585 (0.1% behind), the Intel Xeon 6357P scores 40630 (0.2% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40518 (0.1% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40431 (0.3% behind). The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 cannot be compared directly on performance because no benchmark data exists for it.

For users who require a desktop processor with immediate, measured performance, the Intel Core 7 253PE is the only option with quantifiable results. The AMD part, despite its larger core count and higher thread count, has no verified benchmark output in the database. The AMD processor targets mobile systems with a 55 TDP and AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel chip is a desktop part with a 65 TDP and Intel Socket 1700. The data does not support a performance verdict for the AMD processor; it only supports a specification comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The AMD part has a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: How do the cache configurations differ?

A: The AMD processor has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB L3. The Intel processor has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports LPDDR5X with a quad-channel memory bus and 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 7 253PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory.

Q: What is the integrated graphics solution?

A: The AMD part uses the Radeon 8065S. The Intel part uses the UHD Graphics 730.

Q: What is the production status and release timing?

A: Both are listed as Active in production. The AMD part has a release date of 2026-05-19, while the Intel part has a release date of 2026-03-08.

Q: Does either processor allow overclocking?

A: Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Both are locked.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 belongs to the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO generation built on the Zen 5 architecture, with the codename Gorgon Halo. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, using a die configuration of 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core 7 253PE belongs to the Core 7 generation based on the Bartlett Lake codename, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part is designed for the mobile market segment, while the Intel part is a desktop processor.

The cache hierarchy diverges significantly. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core, but the AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 per core compared to the Intel chip's 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is larger on the AMD side: 64 MB versus 33 MB shared on the Intel side. Memory architecture also differs sharply. AMD uses LPDDR5X with a quad-channel interface and 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel uses DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel interface and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. Both processors support ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-class use.

The PCIe interfaces differ by generation and lane count. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics also represent different tiers: the AMD Radeon 8065S versus the Intel UHD Graphics 730. The production status for both is Active, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD processor's part number is 100-000002124, and the Intel processor's part number is SA4QE.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ: the AMD processor has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel processor has 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 3.10 GHz for AMD versus 2.50 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz for AMD versus 5.50 GHz for Intel. The TDP is 55 watts for the AMD part and 65 watts for the Intel part. The sockets are not interchangeable: AMD Socket FP11 versus Intel Socket 1700.

The process nodes are 4 nm for AMD (TSMC foundry) and 10 nm for Intel (Intel foundry). The AMD processor has a die size of 2x 70.6 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Intel processor. L2 cache is 1 MB per core on AMD versus 2 MB per core on Intel. L3 cache is 64 MB on AMD versus 33 MB shared on Intel. Memory support is LPDDR5X for AMD and DDR4/DDR5 for Intel. The memory bus is quad-channel on AMD and dual-channel on Intel. Memory bandwidth is 273.1 GB/s on AMD versus 89.6 GB/s on Intel.

The PCIe specification is Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 8065S for AMD and the UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The market segment is Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. Release dates are 2026-05-19 for AMD and 2026-03-08 for Intel. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $384; the AMD processor has no recorded launch MSRP. Both have ECC memory support and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core 7 253PE. The AMD processor has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of zero, and a percentile rank of 50. The Intel processor has a full set of benchmark results across Cinebench and Passmark tests.

For the Intel Core 7 253PE, the Cinebench results show a single-core score of 354 in R15, 1475 in R20, and 3512 in R23. The multicore results are 2507 in R15, 10449 in R20, and 24880 in R23. These indicate strong scaling from single to multicore workloads. Passmark tests show a single-thread score of 3955 (recorded twice under different test names) and a multithread score of 29271. The floating-point math score is 80870, integer math is 114158, data compression is 339133, data encryption is 18385, extended instructions is 21806, find prime numbers is 138, physics is 1845, and random string sorting is 32777.

The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 40557, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score. The Intel Core 5 223PE is 0.1% behind, the Intel Xeon 6357P is 0.2% ahead, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is 0.1% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is 0.3% behind. This tight clustering indicates that the Intel Core 7 253PE performs in a narrow band around four other processors.

Because the AMD processor has no benchmark scores, no head-to-head wins can be assigned. The wins counter shows zero for both processors. The data cannot support a statement about which processor is faster in any specific workload category.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 253PE wins in the only category where data exists: measured performance. Its benchmark suite covers rendering (Cinebench R15, R20, R23), mathematical operations (integer math, floating-point math), data tasks (compression, encryption, sorting), and instruction throughput (extended instructions). The single-thread score of 3955 and the multithread score of 29271 in Passmark provide a baseline for single-core-heavy and multicore-heavy applications. The Cinebench multicore scores of 2507 (R15), 10449 (R20), and 24880 (R23) confirm that the processor sustains performance across rendering workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 wins in specifications that suggest higher theoretical capacity, but no benchmark data confirms it. The 16-core, 32-thread configuration with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 64 MB of L3 cache indicates a design aimed at heavily threaded mobile workloads. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth is substantially higher than the Intel part's 89.6 GB/s, which could favor memory-bandwidth-sensitive tasks. The Radeon 8065S integrated graphics is a different class of GPU compared to the UHD Graphics 730, though no graphics benchmarks are recorded.

The market segments decide the practical use cases. The AMD processor is a mobile part with a 55 TDP, suited for laptops or compact systems where power efficiency and integrated graphics matter. The Intel processor is a desktop part with a 65 TDP, suited for conventional desktop builds with the Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes provides newer connectivity for desktop expansion, while the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes targets mobile integration.

The data shows no overlap in measured performance. The Intel Core 7 253PE has the 87th percentile ranking and a complete benchmark profile. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded scores, making its performance unknown. For a buyer relying on database measurements, the Intel processor is the only choice with verified results. The AMD processor's specification advantages in cores, threads, cache, and memory bandwidth remain theoretical until benchmark data is recorded.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI Max+ PRO 495
7 253PE
Core Specs
Cores
16
10 -37.5%
Threads
32
20 -37.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.1
2.5 -19.4%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.5 +5.8%
Frequency (GHz)
3.1
2.5 -19.4%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.5 +5.8%
Multiplier
31
25 -19.4%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
55
65 +18.2%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
45-120 W
—
Architecture
Codename
Gorgon Halo
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO (Zen 5)
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Quad-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
273.1 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP11
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
P-Core Turbo
—
5.3 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 55 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 8065S
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$384
Part Number
100-000002124
SA4QE
Package
FC-BGA
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 Details View Core 7 253PE Details