AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core 5 211TE

The comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core 5 211TE presents a study in contrasting design priorities. The AMD part is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on a 4 nm process with a 55 W TDP, while the Intel part is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop chip on a 10 nm process with a 45 W TDP. The database contains benchmark scores for the Intel Core 5 211TE, but no recorded benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495. This absence of direct measurement data for the AMD processor means the analysis relies on architectural specifications, memory capabilities, and the known performance profile of the Intel chip against its nearest rivals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

For the Intel Core 5 211TE, the recorded benchmark suite covers both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. In Cinebench R23, the Intel processor scores 12,201 points in the multi-core test and 1,722 points in the single-core test. The Cinebench R20 results show 5,124 multi-core and 723 single-core, while the older Cinebench R15 yields 1,229 multi-core and 173 single-core. These numbers place the Intel part at the 69th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 15,370.

The Intel Core 5 211TE shows notable strengths in Passmark tests. The multi-thread score is 11,685, while single-thread performance is recorded at 1,408. In math workloads, the integer math test produces 33,991, and floating point math produces 26,150. Data compression scores 133,434, and data encryption reaches 7,231. Extended instructions deliver 8,615, the physics test scores 1,278, random string sorting scores 14,838, and finding prime numbers scores 72.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark entries in the database, head-to-head comparison must rely on structural differences. The AMD processor has 16 cores and 32 threads versus 10 cores and 16 threads for Intel. The AMD boost clock is 5.20 GHz, above the Intel boost of 4.80 GHz. The AMD base clock of 3.10 GHz nearly doubles the Intel base of 1.70 GHz. These clock and core count differences suggest the AMD part would likely outperform the Intel chip in multi-threaded workloads, but the absence of measured scores prevents a quantitative claim.

The Intel chip’s nearest rivals provide context for its standing. The AMD EPYC 7543 averages 15,477 points, which is 0.7% below the Intel’s score. The AMD EPYC 7702P averages 15,130 points, 1.6% below the Intel. The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U averages 15,682 points, 2% above the Intel. The Intel Core i3-1315U averages 15,022 points, 2.3% below the Intel. These deltas indicate the Intel Core 5 211TE sits in a tight band, roughly 2% above or below these four rivals.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211TE delivers its measured wins across the entire benchmark suite, since it is the only chip with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,201 reflects solid throughput for a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor. The Passmark integer math score of 33,991 and floating point math score of 26,150 show strength in compute-heavy tasks. Data compression at 133,434 is a strong result, indicating the Intel part handles archiving and storage workloads effectively.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no benchmark wins in the database, but its specifications point to advantages in several categories. The 16-core, 32-thread configuration with a 64 MB L3 cache and quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 273.1 GB/s bandwidth suggests the AMD part would excel in memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads such as large data sets, virtualization, and content creation. The AMD part’s 4 nm process node versus Intel’s 10 nm node indicates a higher transistor density, which typically improves power efficiency per core.

The Intel part uses dual-channel memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth, a fraction of the AMD’s quad-channel 273.1 GB/s. This difference is substantial, and benchmark results for the Intel chip reflect its memory constraints. The AMD processor’s Radeon 8065S integrated graphics are specified as stronger than the Intel UHD Graphics 730, but no graphics benchmarks exist in the database to quantify this gap.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses the Gorgon Halo codename from the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO generation based on Zen 5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The die size is recorded as 2x 70.6 mm², indicating a chiplet design with two dies. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename from the Core 5 generation, fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel with a die size of 215 mm². These process and die differences reflect distinct design philosophies: AMD pursues small chiplets on an advanced node, while Intel uses a larger monolithic die on an older process.

Cache hierarchies differ meaningfully. The AMD part provides 80 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core, with 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part also provides 80 KB L1 per core, but has 1.25 MB L2 per core and only 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD’s 64 MB L3 is triple the Intel’s 20 MB, which can improve hit rates for repeated data access patterns.

Memory support diverges sharply. The AMD processor supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, delivering 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, delivering 76.8 GB/s. Both chips support ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer parts and indicates server-adjacent positioning.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The newer PCIe Gen 5 standard on Intel offers higher per-lane bandwidth, though the AMD’s older Gen 4 still provides 16 lanes of connectivity.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is classified as mobile, whereas the Intel part is desktop. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning overclocking is not enabled. The release dates differ: the Intel Core 5 211TE was released in January 2025, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 was released in May 2026. The Intel part’s launch MSRP is $221, which is a single data point and not a comparative metric.

The Verdict

The data shows the Intel Core 5 211TE as the only processor with measured benchmark scores, placing it at the 69th percentile with an average score of 15,370. Its nearest rivals sit within a 2.3% band, meaning the Intel chip performs within a narrow window of those competitors. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded scores, so no quantitative verdict can be derived from benchmarks.

For users who require measured performance data, the Intel Core 5 211TE is the only option with verified results. Its 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, deliver a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 12,201 and a single-core score of 1,722. These results position it as a capable desktop processor for mixed workloads.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495, the specifications alone indicate a different class of hardware. The 16 cores, 32 threads, 5.20 GHz boost clock, 64 MB L3 cache, and quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 273.1 GB/s suggest it targets memory-intensive and heavily threaded tasks. The lack of benchmark scores in the database means any performance claim for the AMD part is speculative, not measured.

The Intel part’s 45 W TDP versus AMD’s 55 W TDP indicates the Intel chip draws less power, but the AMD part offers more cores and threads in a mobile form factor. The Intel part is a desktop chip on Socket 1700, while the AMD part is a mobile chip on Socket FP11, so they are not direct substitutes in the same system.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 211TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 uses quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 5 211TE uses dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 211TE’s average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has an average benchmark score of 15,370 and sits at the 69th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core 5 211TE support ECC memory.