AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 vs Intel Core 5 120U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head measurements between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 and the Intel Core 5 120U. However, the available data for the Intel part and the architectural specifications for the AMD part allow for a clear comparative analysis. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel Core 5 120U has a full suite of results. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible, but the specification sheet for the AMD part indicates a fundamentally different performance class.

The Intel Core 5 120U delivers a measured Cinebench R23 multicore score of 6659 and a single-core score of 1756.5. In Geekbench, it records 5888 multicore and 1727 single-core. These results place it at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 17898. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT with an average score of 17891 and a delta of 0%, the Intel Core 5 221TE at 17860 with a 0.2% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 at 17994 with a -0.5% delta. The Intel Core 7 350 scores 17779, which is 0.7% lower. The data shows the Core 5 120U sits in a tight cluster of desktop and mobile parts from previous generations.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495, the database lists zero benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking, which reflects a lack of recorded measurements rather than actual performance. The specifications, however, are decisive. The AMD part uses 16 cores and 32 threads, compared to 10 cores and 12 threads for the Intel part. The AMD boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz versus 5.00 GHz for Intel. The AMD processor carries a 55 W TDP, while the Intel part is rated at 15 W. These figures indicate the AMD chip is designed for a substantially higher power and performance envelope.

The Intel Core 5 120U shows strong results in specific workloads. Its Passmark integer math score is 52280, floating point math is 36026, and extended instructions score is 9299. Data compression reaches 166432, and data encryption hits 10453. Random string sorting records 19060, while physics scores 937 and find prime numbers scores 53. The single-thread Passmark score is 3479. These numbers demonstrate a capable mobile processor for everyday tasks and light threaded workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495, with double the cores and nearly double the threads, plus a significantly higher boost clock and a 40 W higher TDP, would be expected to outperform the Intel part in every multithreaded benchmark. The memory subsystem also favors AMD: the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports quad-channel LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s, while the Intel Core 5 120U uses dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 with no bandwidth figure recorded. The cache hierarchy further separates the two, with AMD offering 64 MB of L3 cache versus 12 MB shared L3 on Intel.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 5 120U has 10 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 boosts to 5.20 GHz. The Intel Core 5 120U boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 120U has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports LPDDR5X memory across a quad-channel bus. The Intel Core 5 120U supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has a TDP of 55 W. The Intel Core 5 120U has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 120U have recorded benchmark scores?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 5 120U has a full suite of recorded benchmarks, including Cinebench R23 multicore at 6659 and Geekbench multicore at 5888. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is built on the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Halo codename. It uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Core 5 120U is based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U, and uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which typically translates to higher transistor density and improved power efficiency for the AMD part, though the AMD chip consumes more power overall.

The AMD part has a dual-die design with a reported die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel part has no die size recorded. Cache layouts differ significantly. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is the major differentiator: the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 provides 64 MB, while the Intel Core 5 120U provides 12 MB shared. This four-fold difference in L3 capacity benefits the AMD processor in workloads that repeatedly access large datasets.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 5 120U does not. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP11, whereas the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1744. Both are mobile market segments and both are currently active in production. The AMD part was released on May 19, 2026, while the Intel part was released on January 7, 2024. The AMD part has the part number 100-000002124, and the Intel part has the part number SRM7P. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 includes Radeon 8065S graphics. The Intel Core 5 120U includes Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. The database does not provide benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so a direct comparison of graphics performance is not possible from the recorded data.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core 5 120U has 10 cores and 12 threads. The base clock is 3.10 GHz for AMD and 1.40 GHz for Intel. The boost clock is 5.20 GHz for AMD and 5.00 GHz for Intel. The TDP is 55 W for AMD and 15 W for Intel.

The socket types are different: AMD uses Socket FP11, and Intel uses BGA 1744. The process nodes are 4 nm for AMD (TSMC) and 10 nm for Intel (Intel foundry). The cache configuration differs in L2 and L3. AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 64 MB L3. Intel has 1.25 MB L2 per core and 12 MB shared L3. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core.

Memory support diverges completely. AMD supports LPDDR5X only, with a quad-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus and no recorded memory bandwidth. ECC memory is supported by AMD but not by Intel. PCIe lanes are 16 for AMD and 8 for Intel, both Gen 4.

The integrated graphics differ: Radeon 8065S on AMD versus Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on Intel. The codenames and generations are Gorgon Halo with Ryzen AI Max+ PRO (Zen 5) for AMD, and Raptor Lake-U with Core 5 (Raptor Lake-U) for Intel. Release dates are May 19, 2026 for AMD and January 7, 2024 for Intel. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded, and the Intel part also has none.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 120U wins in the category of recorded benchmark data. The database contains 19 benchmark results for this processor, covering Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, Geekbench, and a range of Passmark tests. These results show a processor that performs competitively with desktop parts from the Ryzen 5 1600 and Ryzen 5 3600XT generation, as the nearest rival deltas are all within 0.7%. The Intel part also wins on power efficiency, with a 15 W TDP that is significantly lower than the AMD part's 55 W TDP. For thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermal limits are primary constraints, the Intel Core 5 120U is the more appropriate choice based on the recorded power specification.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 wins on raw specifications. It has 60% more cores and 167% more threads. Its boost clock is 0.20 GHz higher. Its L3 cache is 52 MB larger. Its memory bandwidth is recorded at 273.1 GB/s, which is a quad-channel configuration compared to Intel's dual-channel. The AMD part supports ECC memory, which is a feature absent from the Intel part. The process node is smaller at 4 nm versus 10 nm, which indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology. The AMD part also has double the PCIe lanes at 16 versus 8.

For multithreaded workloads such as video rendering, scientific computation, or heavy compilation, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 would be expected to dominate based on its core count, thread count, cache size, and memory bandwidth. The Intel Core 5 120U would be expected to handle lighter tasks such as web browsing, office productivity, and casual content consumption efficiently given its low TDP and recorded single-thread performance of 1756.5 in Cinebench R23.

The Verdict

The data in the database supports a clear split between these two processors. The Intel Core 5 120U is a measured, efficient mobile processor with a full benchmark record. Its 72nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 17898 place it among capable mainstream parts. Its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT and the Intel Core 5 221TE, are within 0.2% of its score, indicating consistent performance in its class. The 15 W TDP makes it suitable for devices where power draw is a primary concern.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495 is an unmeasured but highly specified processor. With 16 cores, 32 threads, a 5.20 GHz boost clock, 64 MB of L3 cache, quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 273.1 GB/s, and a 55 W TDP, it is positioned for high-performance mobile computing. The absence of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm its actual performance, but the specifications indicate a processor designed for demanding multithreaded tasks.

Users who need a processor for heavy parallel workloads and have access to adequate cooling and power delivery should select the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 495. Users who prioritize low power consumption and need a processor with verified benchmark results should select the Intel Core 5 120U. The Intel part also offers the flexibility of DDR4 or DDR5 memory, which may simplify system design, while the AMD part requires LPDDR5X. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option for either. The choice comes down to power envelope versus core count and memory bandwidth, with the Intel part winning on efficiency and the AMD part winning on specification depth.