AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two processors by workload type and platform intent. The Intel Core i7-14700T is the performance leader in every recorded benchmark category, holding a decisive advantage in multi-threaded and single-threaded tests alike. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i, however, is a fundamentally different product: a 28-watt embedded mobile chip designed for compact, power-conscious systems. The recorded database shows zero benchmark scores for the AMD part, meaning every performance comparison is one-sided.

For users building or specifying a desktop system where raw throughput is the priority, the Intel Core i7-14700T is the only choice with measurable data. Its 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs, an average benchmark score of 41,914, and a 20-core / 28-thread configuration put it in a completely different performance class. The AMD part sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores, so its suitability cannot be validated through the database; it is a mobile embedded processor with a 28-watt TDP, while the Intel part is a desktop processor with a 35-watt TDP. The verdict from the data is unambiguous: the Intel part wins every measurable comparison, and the AMD part serves a niche that the Intel desktop part does not.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different silicon designs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename, belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores, and is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. Its die size is 233 mm². The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, and is fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel. Its die size is 257 mm². The manufacturing process difference is substantial: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which typically translates to significant efficiency and density differences, though the Intel part still delivers higher performance according to the benchmark data.

Core configurations differ sharply. The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part has 20 cores and 28 threads. Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both share an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but the AMD part has 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB of L3, while the Intel part has 2 MB L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3. This gives the Intel part more than double the L3 capacity, which often benefits workloads with large working sets.

The platform support differs in memory and expansion. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capability differs by generation: the AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

Sockets and market segments are entirely different. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8 and is classified as mobile. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as desktop. Release dates place the AMD part at 2026-02-28 and the Intel part at 2024-01-07, roughly two years apart. The Intel part carries part number SRN41 and has a launch MSRP of $384.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700T wins every benchmark category recorded in the database. Its benchmark suite covers Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single-core and multi-core tests, plus PassMark workloads including data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, multithreading, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread tests. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmarks at all, so there is no category where the AMD part shows a win.

The Intel part's strengths are most pronounced in multi-threaded rendering and compute workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,980 indicates strong sustained throughput for CPU-bound tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 30,571 reinforces this. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,667 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,905. The Intel part's 88th percentile ranking versus all CPUs confirms that it sits well above the median processor.

The AMD part's recorded advantage is entirely in platform efficiency, not raw performance. Its 28-watt TDP versus the Intel part's 35-watt TDP, its smaller 233 mm² die versus 257 mm², its 4 nm process versus 10 nm, and its mobile socket classification indicate a design goal of lower power draw and compact integration. The AMD part also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is common in thin mobile systems, and its Radeon 890M integrated graphics may offer different graphics capabilities than Intel's UHD Graphics 770, though no graphics benchmarks are recorded. The data shows the AMD part wins on power efficiency and platform mobility, but loses on every measured performance metric.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T ranks in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the AMD part have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has an empty benchmark array, while the Intel Core i7-14700T has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and both support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor uses a more advanced manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-14700T is fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a TDP of 28 watts, and the Intel Core i7-14700T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-14700T has 17 recorded benchmark scores; the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has none. Therefore, every head-to-head comparison is a direct win for the Intel part by default. The database provides no numbers for the AMD part to compare against, so the analysis below focuses on the Intel part's absolute scores and how they position it against other CPUs in its nearest rival group.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 25,980. This is a strong result for a 35-watt desktop processor. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score is 10,911, and the R15 multi-core score is 2,618. These three scores show consistent scaling across Cinebench versions, indicating stable multi-threaded performance. The single-core scores follow a similar pattern: R23 single-core at 3,667, R20 single-core at 1,540, and R15 single-core at 369.

In PassMark workloads, the Intel part shows specific strengths. The data compression score is 354,216, which is the highest individual score in its benchmark suite. The integer math score is 113,854, and the floating point math score is 79,042. The extended instructions score is 20,052, and the data encryption score is 21,277. The random string sorting score is 38,546. The multithread score is 30,571, and the physics score is 1,946. The prime number finding score is 145, and the single-thread score is 3,905.

The Intel part's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has an average score of 41,963, which is 0.1 percent below the Intel part's 41,914. The Intel Core i7-12850HX has an average score of 41,779, which is 0.3 percent above the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400 has an average score of 42,055, which is 0.3 percent below the Intel part. The Intel Core 7 251TE has an average score of 41,650, which is 0.6 percent above the Intel part. The Intel Core i7-14700T's average benchmark score of 41,914 places it within a tight 0.6 percent band of these four rivals, indicating that its performance is competitive with a cluster of similar-tier processors.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every measurable specification category.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i | Intel Core i7-14700T |

|---|---|---|

| Series | None | Core 14th Gen |

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Cores | 12 | 20 |

| Threads | 24 | 28 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.30 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 33 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | None recorded |

| ECC memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production status | Active | Active |

| Release date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | None | $384 |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | No |

| Part number | Unknown | SRN41 |

The most consequential differences are core count (20 versus 12), L3 cache (33 MB versus 16 MB), process node (10 nm versus 4 nm), and market segment (desktop versus mobile). The Intel part also has a higher boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 5.10 GHz) but a lower base clock (1.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz). The Intel part supports PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD part is limited to Gen 4. The AMD part supports LPDDR5X and has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5 and has no recorded bandwidth figure. The Intel part is the only one with a launch MSRP, listed at $384.