AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i
Core 5 213PTE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 5 213PTE
AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and Intel Core 5 213PTE occupy different positions in the database, with the Intel part holding a substantial performance advantage in recorded benchmark runs. The Intel Core 5 213PTE achieves an average benchmark score of 32,924, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. This places the Intel processor statistically level with several established desktop parts, including the Intel Core i7-12700 (32,942, delta -0.1%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32,812, delta +0.3%), AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33,079, delta -0.5%), and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33,089, delta -0.5%).
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core 5 213PTE. All recorded performance data exists exclusively for the Intel part. The Intel Core 5 213PTE delivers a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 21,751, a single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,070, and a PassMark multithread score of 25,590. Its PassMark single-thread score reaches 3,718. In Cinebench R20, the Intel processor records 9,135 multi-core and 1,289 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 2,192 multi-core and 309 single-core.
The Intel processor's PassMark suite reveals specific strengths. Integer math scores 93,109, floating-point math scores 71,722, extended instructions reach 16,146, and data compression hits 261,083. Data encryption records 14,413, find prime numbers scores 157, random string sorting scores 30,106, and physics simulation scores 2,199. These numbers indicate a processor that handles compute-heavy workloads with consistent throughput across varied instruction types.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has zero benchmark entries in the database. Consequently, no comparative figures exist for its multi-threaded or single-threaded performance against the Intel Core 5 213PTE. The database shows the AMD part only through its specifications and market position, not through measured results. Any analysis of relative performance must rely on architectural differences rather than direct score comparisons.
The Verdict
Based strictly on recorded data, the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the only one of the two processors with measurable performance evidence. Its average benchmark score of 32,924 and 83rd percentile ranking demonstrate a capable desktop processor that matches the performance class of the Intel Core i7-12700 and AMD Ryzen 7 8700G, both of which sit within 0.5% of its average score. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i, lacking any benchmark scores, cannot be positioned against the Intel part from a performance standpoint.
The data indicates the Intel Core 5 213PTE suits users who need verified multi-core and single-core throughput, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 21,751 and single-core at 3,070. Its PassMark multithread score of 25,590 and single-thread score of 3,718 reinforce this profile. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i, with its mobile market segment and active production status, targets a different use case, but the absence of measured scores prevents any performance-based selection.
The Intel Core 5 213PTE launches with an MSRP of $221, a single data point in the database. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. For users who require benchmark-verified performance, the Intel processor is the only option supported by evidence. For users who prioritize the AMD platform's specifications, the choice rests on architectural features rather than measured results.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 213PTE?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE records an average benchmark score of 32,924, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database.
Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has an empty benchmark list, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile of 50.
Q: How does the Intel Core 5 213PTE compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 32,924, which is 0.1% below the Intel Core i7-12700 (32,942), 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32,812), 0.5% below the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (33,079), and 0.5% below the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (33,089).
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 213PTE?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no launch MSRP in the database.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.
Q: What memory types does each processor support?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5.
Specification Differences
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and Intel Core 5 213PTE differ across several core specifications. The AMD part uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part uses 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks stand at 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.10 GHz for Intel, with boost clocks at 5.10 GHz and 5.20 GHz respectively. Thermal design power differs significantly: the AMD processor draws 28 W, the Intel processor draws 45 W.
Socket compatibility separates the two entirely. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i mounts on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE mounts on Intel Socket 1700. Memory bandwidth also differs, with the AMD part reaching 89.6 GB/s and the Intel part reaching 76.8 GB/s. Both support dual-channel memory and ECC memory. PCIe connectivity varies by generation: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
The integrated graphics differ in branding and capability. The AMD processor includes Radeon 890M graphics, while the Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 730. Production status shows both as active. Release dates sit close together: the AMD part released on 2026-02-28, and the Intel part released on 2026-03-08. The Intel part has a part number of SA4QM, while the AMD part's part number is unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename with a generation labeled Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². Cache allocation consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB total L3. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment.
The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a generation labeled Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no die size recorded. Cache allocation differs in L2 and L3: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The Intel processor targets the desktop market segment.
The process node difference, 4 nm versus 10 nm, reflects distinct manufacturing approaches from TSMC and Intel respectively. The AMD part's smaller process node likely contributes to its lower 28 W TDP compared to Intel's 45 W TDP. The AMD processor's mixed Zen 5 and Zen 5c core architecture supports its 12-core, 24-thread configuration, while the Intel processor's Bartlett Lake design supports its 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The AMD part's larger L3 cache per core ratio (16 MB across 12 cores) contrasts with Intel's 24 MB shared L3 across 8 cores.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins decisively in the only category with recorded data: benchmark performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,751 and single-core score of 3,070 demonstrate strong throughput for desktop workloads. PassMark results across integer math (93,109), floating-point math (71,722), and data compression (261,083) indicate broad compute capability. The processor's 83rd percentile ranking and average score of 32,924 place it in a competitive tier with established desktop CPUs.
The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins on specification-driven advantages that the database records. Its 12 cores and 24 threads exceed the Intel part's 8 cores and 16 threads, potentially supporting more concurrent threads. The AMD processor's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s surpasses Intel's 76.8 GB/s. Its 28 W TDP is substantially lower than Intel's 45 W TDP, suggesting a more power-efficient design suited to constrained thermal environments. The AMD part's Radeon 890M integrated graphics and mobile market segment indicate a focus on embedded and portable applications where the Intel desktop-oriented part may not fit.
The AMD processor's 4 nm process node and 233 mm² die size contrast with Intel's 10 nm node and unrecorded die size. The AMD part's architecture, combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, targets efficiency and multi-threading, while the Intel part's Bartlett Lake design with larger L2 (2 MB per core) and L3 (24 MB shared) caches targets desktop responsiveness. Users needing verified performance should select the Intel Core 5 213PTE based on its recorded scores. Users needing lower power consumption, higher memory bandwidth, or more cores for embedded use should consider the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i, though its performance remains unmeasured in the database.