AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 3 305 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core 3 305. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals in the database. All recorded performance data belongs to the Intel Core 3 305.

The Intel Core 3 305 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,123 and a single-core score of 1,852. In Cinebench R20, it records 5,511 multi-core and 777 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 1,322 multi-core and 186 single-core. These results place the Intel part at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18,302.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 3 305 are tightly clustered. The Intel Core i3-14100 scores 18,318, which is 0.1% above the Core 3 305. The Intel Core 5 330 scores 18,345, 0.2% higher. The Intel Core 7 360 scores 18,374, 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600E scores 18,230, which is 0.4% lower. The Core 3 305 sits almost exactly in the middle of this group, with differences under half a percentage point in either direction. The data indicates that the Core 3 305 performs within a narrow band around its closest competitors, neither clearly dominant nor clearly trailing any of them.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i cannot be assigned any benchmark wins because the database contains no recorded performance measurements for it. The Intel Core 3 305 wins every category by default, since it is the only one of the two with benchmark data.

The PassMark results for the Intel Core 3 305 show its strongest areas. Data compression scores 146,857, which is the highest single output among its PassMark tests. Data encryption records 11,019. Extended instructions score 13,543. Find prime numbers scores 115. Floating point math records 42,284. Integer math scores 32,295. Multithread scores 15,439. Physics scores 1,233. Random string sorting scores 17,623. Single thread scores 3,977, with a duplicate single-threaded entry at the same value.

The multi-threaded Cinebench scores relative to the single-threaded scores indicate strong scaling. The R23 multi-core score of 13,123 is roughly 7.1 times the single-core score of 1,852. The R20 ratio is similar, with 5,511 divided by 777 equaling about 7.1. The R15 ratio is 1,322 divided by 186, which is also about 7.1. With 6 cores and 6 threads, this scaling factor is notable because there is no simultaneous multithreading. The consistent ratio across three Cinebench versions suggests the workload scales nearly linearly with core count.

The Verdict

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward. The Intel Core 3 305 has substantial benchmark coverage and a 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no percentile ranking beyond the default 50th percentile placeholder. Any direct comparison of measured performance is impossible with the current database contents.

The Intel Core 3 305 should be selected when a database user requires measured performance data, since it is the only one of the two with any recorded scores. Its average benchmark score of 18,302 places it within 0.4% of four nearby rivals, indicating consistent performance in its class. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i should be selected only when its specific architectural features are the priority, since the database provides no evidence of its computational performance.

The data does not support a claim that either processor is faster. The absence of AMD benchmark data means the Intel part is not "better" in a measured sense; it is simply the only one with measurements. The AMD part may be faster, slower, or similar, but the database cannot confirm any of these possibilities.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What is the Intel Core 3 305 Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,123 and a single-core score of 1,852.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 305 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100 is 0.1% higher, the Intel Core 5 330 is 0.2% higher, the Intel Core 7 360 is 0.4% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 5 2600E is 0.4% lower in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the Intel Core 3 305 percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core 3 305 sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i have a launch MSRP?

A: No launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i. The Intel Core 3 305 has a launch MSRP of $309.

Q: What is the highest PassMark score recorded for the Intel Core 3 305?

A: The highest PassMark output is data compression at 146,857. The lowest is find prime numbers at 115.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename with a Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It has 12 cores and 24 threads, which means simultaneous multithreading is enabled. The Intel Core 3 305 uses the Wildcat Lake codename with a Core 3 generation. It has 6 cores and 6 threads, which means no simultaneous multithreading.

The process nodes differ. AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. Intel uses a 3 nm process from its own foundry. The AMD die size is 233 mm². Intel has no die size recorded.

Cache structures differ significantly. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD L3 cache is more than 2.6 times larger than the Intel L3 cache. The per-core L2 allocation is also higher on the AMD side.

The integrated graphics differ. AMD uses a Radeon 890M. Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. Both processors target the mobile market segment and are currently active in production.

The AMD part has ECC memory support enabled. The Intel part does not support ECC memory. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier set to false, and the Intel processor also has an unlocked multiplier set to false. Neither processor allows overclocking through the multiplier.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most obvious difference. AMD provides 12 cores and 24 threads. Intel provides 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part doubles the core count and quadruples the thread count.

Clock speeds differ. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel base clock is 1.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 0.80 GHz higher, and the base clock is 0.50 GHz higher.

Power targets differ. The AMD TDP is 28 watts. The Intel TDP is 15 watts. The AMD part draws a higher power allocation.

Sockets differ. AMD uses AMD Socket FP8. Intel uses Intel BGA 1516.

Memory support is similar in type but different in channel configuration. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X. AMD uses dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel uses single-channel memory with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The AMD memory bandwidth is 29.9 GB/s higher.

PCIe support differs. AMD has Gen 4 with 16 lanes, CPU only. Intel has Gen 4 with 6 lanes, CPU only. The AMD part offers 10 additional PCIe lanes.

Release dates differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i released on 2026-02-28. The Intel Core 3 305 released on 2026-04-15. The AMD part came to market approximately six weeks earlier.

The launch MSRP is recorded only for the Intel Core 3 305 at $309. The AMD part has no launch MSRP in the database. The Intel part number is SAE3L. The AMD part number is unknown.

The process node, foundry, cache layout, integrated graphics, ECC support, and memory channel configuration all differ as described in the architecture section. The market segment for both is mobile. Both are active in production. Both have locked multipliers.