AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, while the Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark entries listed. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible. However, the AMD part’s individual scores can be interpreted against its nearest rivals in the database, which include several Intel and AMD processors.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 posts an average benchmark score of 62,839. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, scores 62,738, a delta of 0.2 percent in favor of the AMD chip. The Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63,080, placing it 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD part. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63,173, a 0.5 percent advantage. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 scores 62,498, which is 0.5 percent behind the P185. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating the P185 sits in a tight performance cluster.

Looking at specific workloads, the P185’s single-thread score is 3,977. Its multithread score is 31,817. The integer math test yields 117,832, while floating-point math produces 70,587. Data compression scores 374,429, and data encryption returns 19,612. Extended instructions score 26,544. Prime number finding returns 129. Random string sorting scores 40,557. The physics test returns 1,772.

Since the Intel Processor U302L has no recorded benchmarks, its percentile ranking of 50 versus the AMD part’s 93 percentile across all CPUs provides the only comparative signal. The data shows the AMD chip is positioned far higher in the overall performance distribution, though the Intel part’s lack of scores means no workload-specific deltas can be stated.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Processor U302L uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, and is built on Intel’s 10 nm process. Its die size is not recorded in the database.

Core counts differ substantially. The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel part has 5 cores and 6 threads. Cache layouts also diverge. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 10 MB of shared L3 cache.

Clock speeds show a wide gap. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel base clock is 1.20 GHz with a boost clock of 2.40 GHz. Thermal design power differs as well: the AMD part is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 15 watts.

Memory support varies. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its memory bandwidth is not listed and it does not support ECC memory.

PCI Express connectivity also differs. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are different: the AMD part uses Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 80EU.

Sockets are not shared. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. Production status for both is listed as Active. The AMD part has a release date of 2026-02-28, while the Intel part has a release date of 2024-04-07. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded; the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $285. Both processors have locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins in every benchmark category that has recorded data, simply because the Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark scores in the database. The AMD part’s multithread score of 31,817 and single-thread score of 3,977 indicate strong performance in both parallel and latency-sensitive workloads. Its integer math score of 117,832 and floating-point score of 70,587 suggest solid number-crunching capability. The data compression score of 374,429 is the highest single result among its recorded tests, pointing to strong throughput in data-heavy tasks.

The Intel Processor U302L, by virtue of having no recorded benchmark scores, cannot be credited with any wins in the database. Its lower core count, lower clock speeds, and smaller L3 cache suggest it is designed for lower-power operation, but the data does not support any performance claims beyond its specifications.

For the AMD part, the nearest rival comparisons show where it sits relative to other processors. Against the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, the AMD chip is 0.2 percent ahead. Against the Intel Core i7-13790F, it is 0.4 percent behind. Against the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX, it is 0.5 percent behind. Against the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465, it is 0.5 percent ahead. These deltas are small, indicating the P185 competes within a narrow performance band among those chips.

The AMD part’s 93rd percentile ranking across all CPUs in the database places it in the upper tier of processors. The Intel part’s 50th percentile ranking places it at the median. This percentile gap is the clearest overall performance distinction the data provides.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the higher-performing processor. It has 12 cores and 24 threads versus 5 cores and 6 threads for the Intel Processor U302L. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz far exceeds the Intel part’s 2.40 GHz. Its L3 cache of 16 MB is larger than the Intel part’s 10 MB. Its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is recorded, while the Intel part’s is not. Its 93rd percentile ranking versus the Intel part’s 50th percentile reinforces the performance gap.

The Intel Processor U302L has a lower TDP of 15 watts versus 28 watts for the AMD part, indicating a lower power envelope. It also supports DDR4 memory, which the AMD part does not, and it has a recorded launch MSRP of $285, while the AMD part has none. However, without benchmark scores, the Intel chip’s performance cannot be quantified in the database.

Buyers needing high core counts, high clock speeds, and ECC memory support should favor the AMD part. Buyers prioritizing lower power consumption and DDR4 compatibility might consider the Intel part, but the data offers no performance validation for it. The AMD chip’s benchmark results and percentile ranking make it the clear choice from a performance standpoint.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Processor U302L has a boost clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 ranks in the 93rd percentile across all CPUs in the database. The Intel Processor U302L ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the Intel Processor U302L have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Processor U302L. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor U302L supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the thermal design power of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Processor U302L has a TDP of 15 watts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 | Intel Processor U302L |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 12 | 5 |

| Threads | 24 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 10 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 80EU |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-04-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $285 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRPKGQ5CX |