AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and the Intel Processor 300. The AMD part sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Intel Processor 300 lands at the 50th percentile, a clear separation that places them in entirely different performance classes. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 produces an average benchmark score of 62,839, while the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, making direct head-to-head comparisons impossible. However, the AMD part’s nearest rivals provide context: the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 62,738 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63,080 (0.4% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX scores 63,173 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 scores 62,498 (0.5% behind). These margins are narrow, indicating the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 trades blows with high-end desktop and mobile parts, while the Intel Processor 300 has no comparable data.

Looking at the specific PassMark subtests for the AMD processor, the results show strength in several areas. The data compression score of 374,429 indicates heavy throughput for compression workloads, while integer math reaches 117,832 and floating point math reaches 70,587. Random string sorting scores 40,557, extended instructions hit 26,544, and data encryption reaches 19,612. The multithread score is 31,817, with a single-thread score of 3,977. Physics processing scores 1,772, and find prime numbers scores 129. These numbers represent the full recorded benchmark profile for the AMD part. The Intel Processor 300 has no benchmark entries, so the database provides no direct comparative scores. The verdict from the data is clear: the AMD processor dominates the Intel part on every measurable axis, with the caveat that the Intel part lacks any recorded measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Processor 300 uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip is based on the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation with mixed Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel part uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename. The AMD processor integrates 12 cores with 24 threads, whereas the Intel Processor 300 has just 2 cores and 4 threads. This core count difference alone explains most of the performance gap in multithreaded workloads.

Cache configurations also differ substantially. The AMD part offers 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part matches the 80 KB L1 per core, but its L2 is 1.25 MB per core and its L3 is 6 MB shared. The AMD L3 cache is nearly three times larger, which benefits workloads that repeatedly access a large working set. The base clock for the AMD processor is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and no recorded boost clock. The higher base clock on the Intel part does not compensate for the massive thread advantage of the AMD chip.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Processor 300 supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part but not on the Intel part. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The AMD chip includes a Radeon 890M integrated GPU, while the Intel part has UHD Graphics 710. The AMD processor is a mobile segment part with a 28 TDP, and the Intel processor is a desktop part with a 46 TDP. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The Intel Processor 300 has a part number of SRN3J and a release date in January 2024, while the AMD part releases in February 2026. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The performance split is lopsided based on the available data. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins every workload category where measurements exist. Its multithread score of 31,817 reflects the 12-core, 24-thread design, making it suitable for parallel processing tasks such as rendering, compilation, and scientific computing. The single-thread score of 3,977 indicates strong per-core performance, so even lightly threaded applications receive a solid boost. Data compression at 374,429 shows the chip handles large data streams effectively. Integer math at 117,832 and floating point math at 70,587 indicate balanced compute capability across both integer and floating point domains. The encryption score of 19,612 and extended instructions score of 26,544 suggest the chip includes modern instruction set extensions that accelerate cryptographic and vector workloads.

The Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database does not indicate any workload where it wins. Given its 2-core, 4-thread configuration, its likely strengths would revolve around low-power basic tasks, but no data supports a specific claim. The AMD part’s higher TDP of 28 compared to the Intel part’s 46 TDP is notable: the AMD chip delivers far more performance while drawing less power, at least according to the recorded TDP figures. The AMD part’s 5.10 GHz boost clock also gives it a peak frequency advantage over the Intel part’s 3.90 GHz base clock, and while the Intel part has a higher base clock, the lack of a recorded boost clock leaves its peak performance unspecified. For users who need heavy multithreading, the AMD part is the only realistic choice from the data. For users who value a compact desktop processor with two cores and basic integrated graphics, the Intel Processor 300 exists as a low-complexity option, but the database shows no performance evidence in its favor.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and no recorded boost clock.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300 does not.

Q: What integrated graphics do these processors include?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 includes a Radeon 890M. The Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has an average benchmark score of 62,839 and sits in the 93rd percentile. The Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits in the 50th percentile with an average score of 0.

Q: What memory types are supported by each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Processor 300 supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

The Verdict

The database clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. With 12 cores, 24 threads, a 5.10 GHz boost clock, 16 MB of L3 cache, and a 93rd percentile ranking, it delivers high-end performance across all recorded benchmarks. Its nearest rivals in the database, such as the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465, score within 0.5% of the AMD part, confirming that it competes with top-tier mainstream processors. The Intel Processor 300, with 2 cores, 4 threads, a 3.90 GHz base clock, and no recorded benchmark scores, offers no measurable performance evidence in its favor. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, includes a more capable integrated GPU (Radeon 890M versus UHD Graphics 710), and carries a lower TDP of 28 compared to 46. The Intel part does have a higher base clock and a Gen 5 PCIe interface with 16 lanes, but these factors do not offset the massive core and cache disadvantage. For any workload requiring compute throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the clear pick based on the data. The Intel Processor 300 remains an option only for basic desktop tasks where its lower core count and simpler design suffice, but no benchmark data supports a performance recommendation.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 | Intel Processor 300 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 2 |

| Threads | 24 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | Not recorded |

| TDP | 28 | 46 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part Number | unknown | SRN3J |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |