AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 356H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and Intel Core Ultra 7 356H are both active mobile processors, but the recorded benchmark data shows two very different performance personalities. The AMD part wins decisively in integer-heavy tasks, while the Intel chip dominates in floating-point, physics, and encryption workloads. The data suggests these are not direct competitors, but rather tools for different computational priorities.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result in the database is the integer math test. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 117832, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H manages 83111. That is a 41.8% lead for AMD, the largest delta of any recorded comparison. This is a substantial gap that indicates a significant advantage in workloads that rely on general-purpose arithmetic and logic operations.

The AMD processor also wins data compression, scoring 374429 against Intel's 336177, a 11.4% advantage. This is a practical win for tasks involving file archiving, databases, and certain types of storage workloads.

Beyond these two wins, the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H holds the advantage across the remaining nine head-to-head benchmarks. The most dramatic Intel victory is in the find prime numbers test, where Intel scores 327 versus AMD's 129, a 60.6% difference. This is a massive gap that points to a stark difference in how the two chips handle certain types of algorithmic loops.

Floating point math also heavily favors Intel. The Core Ultra 7 356H scores 103128, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 70587, a 31.6% deficit for AMD. This is critical for scientific computing, 3D rendering, and any workload that uses non-integer calculations heavily.

The physics benchmark shows a similar story. Intel scores 2895, which is 38.8% higher than AMD's 1772. This test is often correlated with gaming physics and simulation performance. Data encryption also goes to Intel, with a score of 26345 versus AMD's 19612, a 25.6% win. This suggests the Intel chip has a stronger hardware acceleration path for cryptographic tasks.

In the multithreaded benchmark, Intel wins with a score of 33978 against AMD's 31817, a 6.4% lead. This is a moderate but consistent advantage. The single-thread test also goes to Intel, with 4072 against AMD's 3977, a 2.3% margin. The extended instructions test is close, with Intel scoring 27898 against AMD's 26544, a 4.9% edge. Random string sorting is nearly a tie, with Intel at 40990 and AMD at 40557, a 1.1% difference.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has an average benchmark score of 62839, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H has an average score of 41215.

Q: What is the difference in their percentile rankings?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ranks in the 87th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel processor compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H has an average score of 41215, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, has an average score of 41208, a delta of 0%.

Q: Which chip is better for integer math workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is significantly better, scoring 117832 compared to Intel's 83111 in the PassMark integer math test, a 41.8% advantage.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is built on a 4 nm process, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is built on a 3 nm process.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which is based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H uses the Panther Lake architecture and is from the Ultra 7 Panther Lake-H generation, built by Intel on a 3 nm process.

The core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD chip has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel chip has 16 cores and 16 threads. This means the AMD processor uses simultaneous multithreading to double its thread count, while the Intel processor does not. The cache structure is also different. AMD provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a total of 16 MB of L3 cache. Intel provides 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory bandwidth is another clear point of divergence. The Intel chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, while the AMD chip has 89.6 GB/s. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, but the Intel chip has a higher theoretical throughput. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not.

The PCIe interface also differs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes available to the CPU, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H uses PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes available to the CPU. The integrated graphics are different as well, with AMD using the Radeon 890M and Intel using Xe3 Graphics.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the higher-performing chip overall, despite losing the majority of individual head-to-head tests. Its average benchmark score of 62839 is substantially higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H's 41215, and it sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs compared to Intel's 87th. The AMD chip also has a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus the Intel's 4.70 GHz.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H wins in more individual tests, but its wins are largely in categories that are less heavily weighted in the average score. Its victories in floating point math, physics, and encryption are significant, but they do not compensate for the AMD chip's massive lead in integer math and data compression, which appear to be more impactful in the overall scoring.

For users who need maximum multithreaded performance for a broad range of tasks, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the stronger choice based on the average benchmark score and percentile ranking. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is a capable processor, but its lower average score and its specific strengths in floating-point and encryption workloads make it a more specialized option.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H has 16 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is close, with AMD at 2.00 GHz and Intel at 1.90 GHz, but the boost clock favors AMD at 5.10 GHz versus Intel's 4.70 GHz. The TDP is 28 watts for AMD and 25 watts for Intel.

The sockets are different: AMD uses Socket FP8, while Intel uses BGA 2540. The process node is also different, with AMD at 4 nm and Intel at 3 nm. The cache sizes differ across all levels. AMD has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. Intel has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3.

Memory bandwidth is higher on the Intel chip at 115.2 GB/s versus AMD's 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support is exclusive to AMD. The PCIe generation and lane count differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes and Intel offering Gen 5 with 12 lanes. The integrated graphics are also different, with AMD using Radeon 890M and Intel using Xe3 Graphics. The release dates are close, with Intel releasing on 2026-01-04 and AMD on 2026-02-28.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the clear winner for integer-heavy workloads. Its 41.8% lead in integer math and 11.4% lead in data compression make it the preferred option for tasks like code compilation, database operations, and general-purpose business applications that rely on logical operations. Its higher thread count of 24 versus 16 also suggests it can handle more concurrent threads, even though it loses the multithread benchmark.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H wins decisively in floating-point math and physics, making it the better choice for scientific simulations, 3D rendering, and gaming physics. Its 60.6% lead in prime number finding indicates a strong advantage in certain types of algorithm execution. The 25.6% lead in data encryption makes it a better fit for security-focused applications, VPNs, and encrypted storage workloads.

The single-thread and multithread scores both favor Intel, with a 2.3% and 6.4% lead respectively. This means the Intel chip delivers slightly better raw performance in most general-purpose tasks, but the AMD chip's massive wins in specific categories, particularly integer math, give it the higher average benchmark score. The choice comes down to whether the workload is more general or more specialized toward floating-point and encryption.