AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Point
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 225T

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 10 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
374,429
233,998
passmark_data_encryption
19,612
18,289
passmark_extended_instructions
26,544
20,083
passmark_find_prime_numbers
129
284
passmark_floating_point_math
70,587
82,751
passmark_integer_math
117,832
59,543
passmark_multithread
31,817
25,358
passmark_physics
1,772
2,053
passmark_random_string_sorting
40,557
28,774
passmark_single_thread
3,977
4,348
passmark_singlethread
3,977
4,348
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,214
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
312
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,227
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,302
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
21,971
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,101

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T

The Verdict

The recorded data splits these two processors cleanly by workload. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins 6 of the 11 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins 5. However, the margin of victory matters more than the count. AMD takes the PassMark multithread test with a score of 31817 against Intel's 25358, a 25.5% advantage. In integer math, AMD is dominant at 117832 versus 59543, a 97.9% lead. Intel counters with a single-thread score of 4348 versus 3977, an 8.5% edge, and a physics score of 2053 versus 1772, a 13.7% lead. The AMD part sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 82nd percentile. The average benchmark score for AMD is 62839, for Intel it is 30468. The verdict: AMD for heavily threaded, integer-heavy work; Intel for single-thread and physics-oriented tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins in data compression with a score of 374429, which is 60% ahead of Intel's 233998. That is the largest percentage win for AMD in the head-to-head set. AMD also wins integer math by 97.9%, multithread by 25.5%, extended instructions by 32.2%, random string sorting by 41%, and data encryption by 7.2%. These wins point to workloads that scale with many cores and threads, particularly compression, sorting, and encryption. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins in find prime numbers with a score of 284 versus 129, a 54.6% lead. It also wins floating point math at 82751 versus 70587, a 14.7% lead. Intel wins physics at 2053 versus 1772, a 13.7% lead, and single-thread at 4348 versus 3977, an 8.5% lead. Prime number finding and physics both respond to high per-core throughput, which Intel's architecture delivers here.

Architecture Differences

AMD uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 / Zen 5c. The process node is 4 nm at TSMC. The die size is 233 mm². The CPU has 12 cores and 24 threads. Cache consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. Memory support covers DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported. PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Radeon 890M. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, and the market segment is mobile. The release date is 2026-02-28.

Intel uses the Arrow Lake-S codename and belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, generation Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake). The process node is 3 nm at TSMC. The die size is 243 mm², and the transistor count is 17,800 million. The CPU has 10 cores and 10 threads. Cache consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 only over a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU. The socket is Intel Socket 1851, and the market segment is desktop. The release date is 2024-12-31.

The most striking architectural split is threads. AMD has 24 threads versus Intel's 10, which explains the multithread and integer math gaps. Intel has a smaller 3 nm process and more L2 per core at 3 MB versus 1 MB, plus more L3 at 20 MB versus 16 MB. Intel also has wider memory bandwidth at 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s, and newer PCIe Gen 5 lanes. AMD supports ECC, Intel does not.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multithread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 31817 in PassMark multithread, which is 25.5% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T's 25358.

Q: Which processor wins the single-thread test?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T wins single-thread with a score of 4348, an 8.5% lead over the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185's 3977.

Q: How do the two compare in integer math?

A: AMD is nearly double Intel in integer math. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 117832, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 59543, a 97.9% difference.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each?

A: Intel has 102.4 GB/s, AMD has 89.6 GB/s. Intel's is roughly 14% higher.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T does not.

Q: Which has more cores and threads?

A: AMD has 12 cores and 24 threads. Intel has 10 cores and 10 threads.

Q: What is the PCIe generation for each?

A: Intel uses PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. AMD uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest AMD win is integer math. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 117832, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 59543, and the delta is 97.9%. This is nearly double the output. The second largest AMD win is data compression at 374429 versus 233998, a 60% advantage. Random string sorting also favors AMD heavily: 40557 versus 28774, a 41% lead. Extended instructions go to AMD at 26544 versus 20083, a 32.2% lead. Multithread goes to AMD at 31817 versus 25358, a 25.5% lead. Data encryption is closer, with AMD at 19612 versus Intel's 18289, only a 7.2% edge.

The largest Intel win is find prime numbers. Intel scores 284, AMD scores 129, and the delta is 54.6% in Intel's favor. Floating point math goes to Intel at 82751 versus 70587, a 14.7% lead. Physics goes to Intel at 2053 versus 1772, a 13.7% lead. Single-thread goes to Intel at 4348 versus 3977, an 8.5% lead. The two single-thread entries in the database are identical for both CPUs, confirming the same recorded score of 3977 for AMD and 4348 for Intel.

The data also shows a notable separation in average benchmark scores. AMD's average is 62839, which places it near rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62738 (0.2% behind) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX at 63173 (0.5% ahead). Intel's average is 30468, which places it near the Intel Core i9-11980HK at 30422 (0.2% behind) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS at 30390 (0.3% ahead). These two CPUs are not competing in the same performance tier according to the database. AMD's average is roughly double Intel's average.

The PassMark physics test is interesting because Intel wins it despite losing multithread. Intel scores 2053, AMD scores 1772. Physics often tracks single-core efficiency, and Intel's single-thread lead of 8.5% aligns with that. Similarly, floating point math favors Intel at 82751, while integer math strongly favors AMD. This split suggests the two architectures handle different math workloads differently: AMD's extra threads and 4 nm process drive integer throughput, while Intel's 3 nm process and larger per-core cache drive floating point and prime number generation.

The data compression result deserves emphasis. AMD's 374429 is 60% higher than Intel's 233998. Compression workloads often scale with thread count and memory bandwidth. AMD has 24 threads versus Intel's 10, but Intel has higher memory bandwidth at 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. The thread advantage appears to outweigh the bandwidth advantage in this test. Random string sorting also relies heavily on parallel execution, and AMD's 41% win reinforces that pattern.

The encryption test is the closest head-to-head result. AMD scores 19612, Intel scores 18289, and the delta is only 7.2%. Both CPUs handle encryption similarly, but AMD still takes the lead. The extended instructions test shows a 32.2% AMD advantage, which indicates AMD's instruction set extensions perform better in the recorded workload.

The prime number test is the opposite extreme. Intel's 284 is more than double AMD's 129. This is a 54.6% difference, and it is the only benchmark where the winner leads by more than 50% in Intel's favor. Prime number finding is typically single-threaded and latency-sensitive, so Intel's 4.90 GHz boost clock versus AMD's 5.10 GHz boost clock is not the deciding factor. The architecture's per-core efficiency is more relevant.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in nearly every major specification field. AMD has 12 cores and 24 threads; Intel has 10 cores and 10 threads. AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz; Intel's is 2.50 GHz. AMD's boost clock is 5.10 GHz; Intel's is 4.90 GHz. AMD's TDP is 28 watts; Intel's is 65 watts. AMD uses AMD Socket FP8; Intel uses Intel Socket 1851. AMD's codename is Gorgon Point; Intel's is Arrow Lake-S. AMD's generation is Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c); Intel's is Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake). AMD is on a 4 nm process; Intel is on a 3 nm process. AMD's die size is 233 mm²; Intel's is 243 mm². Intel reports 17,800 million transistors; AMD does not report a transistor count.

Cache differs substantially. AMD has 80 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core, with 16 MB L3. Intel has 192 KB L1 per core and 3 MB L2 per core, with 20 MB shared L3. Intel has more cache at every level. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X; Intel supports DDR5 only. Both are dual-channel. AMD's memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s; Intel's is 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on AMD only. PCIe differs: AMD has Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel has Gen 5 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD uses Radeon 890M, Intel uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU. AMD's market segment is mobile; Intel's is desktop. AMD's release date is 2026-02-28; Intel's is 2024-12-31. Neither has an unlocked multiplier, and neither reports a launch MSRP in the database.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI Embedded P185
Ultra 5 225T
Core Specs
Cores
12
10 -16.7%
Threads
24
10 -58.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.5 +25.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.5 +25.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Multiplier
20
25 +25.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
35 W
PL2
—
114 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
—
Arrow Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Transistors
—
17,800 million
Die Size
233 mm²
243 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
—
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 8
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
1900 MHz up to 4.4 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 890M
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
unknown
unknown
Package
FP8
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
105°C
105°C
View Ryzen AI Embedded P185 Details View Core Ultra 5 225T Details