AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core i9-14900HX Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and Intel Core i9-14900HX are two mobile processors aimed at very different workloads. The database records show a complete sweep for the Intel part in head-to-head PassMark tests, with the Intel Core i9-14900HX winning all 11 recorded comparisons. However, the AMD chip operates in a different power envelope and features a different core configuration, making the choice between them less about raw speed and more about system-level priorities.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous in favor of the Intel Core i9-14900HX. Across all 11 recorded PassMark tests, the Intel processor delivered higher scores. The largest margin appears in floating-point math, where the Intel part scored 112,273 against the AMD's 70,587, a delta of -37.1%. This indicates a substantial advantage for workloads that rely heavily on floating-point calculations, such as scientific simulations or certain rendering tasks.

Data encryption also shows a major gap. The Intel Core i9-14900HX scored 32,619 while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scored 19,612, a delta of -39.9%. This is the largest percentage difference recorded between the two. Random string sorting follows closely, with Intel at 60,861 and AMD at 40,557, a delta of -33.4%. These results suggest the Intel processor handles memory-intensive and cryptographic operations with notably higher throughput.

The multithreaded score, which often serves as a proxy for overall heavy multi-core performance, also favors Intel. The Core i9-14900HX posted 43,778 versus the AMD's 31,817, a delta of -27.3%. The physics test, which can be sensitive to core count and scheduling, shows Intel at 2,638 against AMD's 1,772, a delta of -32.8%. Prime number finding, another compute-heavy test, gives Intel 193 versus AMD's 129, a delta of -33.2%.

Even in single-threaded performance, where the AMD chip might be expected to compete given its higher base clock relative to its power class, Intel leads. The PassMark single-thread test scores are 4,175 for Intel and 3,977 for AMD, a delta of -4.7%. This is the closest margin in the entire dataset, but it still represents a consistent Intel advantage. Integer math follows the same pattern, with Intel at 157,375 and AMD at 117,832, a delta of -25.1%. Extended instructions show Intel at 31,247 against AMD's 26,544, a delta of -15.1%. Data compression completes the sweep, with Intel at 539,965 and AMD at 374,429, a delta of -30.7%.

The overall picture from the head-to-head data is one of consistent Intel superiority across every measured category. The deltas range from modest at -4.7% in single-thread to severe at -39.9% in encryption. No recorded test shows the AMD processor gaining ground.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score in the head-to-head data?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 4,175 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 3,977. The Intel part leads by -4.7%.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multithreaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 43,778 in the PassMark multithread test, compared to 31,817 for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. This represents a delta of -27.3% in favor of Intel.

Q: What is the biggest percentage difference recorded between the two processors?

A: The data encryption test shows the largest gap. The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 32,619, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 19,612, resulting in a delta of -39.9%.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any head-to-head benchmark tests?

A: No. The recorded data shows the Intel Core i9-14900HX winning all 11 head-to-head PassMark tests. The AMD processor has zero wins in this comparison.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has an average benchmark score of 62,839, while the Intel Core i9-14900HX has an average of 56,004. This puts the AMD part in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, versus the 91st percentile for Intel.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i9-14900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i9-14900HX is the superior processor for raw compute performance in every measured PassMark test. Its wins span all categories, from integer and floating-point math to encryption and data compression. The margins are substantial, often exceeding 25% and reaching nearly 40% in encryption. Any workload that prioritizes maximum speed, particularly in multi-threaded or floating-point-heavy scenarios, should favor the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, however, holds a different position. Its average benchmark score of 62,839 is higher than the Intel's 56,004, and its 93rd percentile ranking is two points above Intel's 91st. This suggests that when measured against a broader field of processors, the AMD chip performs well relative to its competition, even if it loses directly to this specific Intel model. The AMD processor also has a significantly lower TDP of 28 watts, compared to Intel's 55 watts, which indicates a different design target.

The choice between them depends on the system's constraints. For users who need the absolute highest throughput in CPU-bound tasks and can accommodate a higher-power mobile processor, the Intel Core i9-14900HX is the clear choice based on the recorded benchmarks. For systems where power consumption is a limiting factor and the processor must fit into a tighter thermal envelope, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 offers a compelling package with a higher average score against the general CPU population, despite losing this direct comparison.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ substantially in their core configurations. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i9-14900HX uses 24 cores and 32 threads. This core count difference is a primary driver of the multithreaded performance gap.

Clock speeds also vary. The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The Intel part holds the advantage in both base and boost frequencies.

Power consumption differs significantly. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i9-14900HX has a TDP of 55 watts. This nearly twofold difference in thermal design power affects system cooling requirements and battery life expectations.

Memory support shows a split. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure recorded in the database.

PCIe generation differs. The AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives Intel a newer interconnect standard.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part uses the Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor has a die size of 233 mm², while the Intel processor has a die size of 257 mm².

Architecture Differences

The processors are built on different manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14900HX uses a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. This process difference contributes to the AMD part's lower power consumption.

The core architectures are distinct. The AMD processor is part of the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which uses a combination of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel processor is part of the Raptor Lake-HX codename and belongs to the Core i9 generation, which uses the Raptor Lake architecture with a Refresh designation.

Cache configurations show notable differences. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs, with AMD using 1 MB per core and Intel using 2 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a significant gap: the AMD processor has 16 MB, while the Intel processor has 36 MB shared. This larger L3 cache on the Intel part likely contributes to its performance in data-heavy workloads.

Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1964. The Intel processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD processor does not. The Intel part has a recorded part number of SRMXF.

The release dates differ as well. The AMD processor was released on 2026-02-28, while the Intel processor was released on 2024-01-07. The Intel part is from the Core 14th Gen series, while the AMD part has no series designation recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-14900HX wins in every direct head-to-head benchmark recorded. Its strengths are most pronounced in encryption, floating-point math, and random string sorting, where the deltas exceed 33%. The multithreaded score of 43,778 indicates strong performance in heavily parallel workloads. The physics test score of 2,638 and the prime number score of 193 reinforce this pattern. For tasks like video rendering, complex simulations, or large-scale data processing, the Intel processor is the better option based on the data.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has no head-to-head wins, but its higher average benchmark score of 62,839 and its 93rd percentile ranking indicate it performs well against a broader range of CPUs. Its lower TDP of 28 watts makes it a fit for systems where power consumption is a primary constraint. The Radeon 890M integrated graphics and support for LPDDR5X memory suggest a focus on compact, power-efficient designs. The AMD processor also uses a smaller 4 nm process node, which contributes to its efficiency profile.

In practical terms, the Intel processor is for users who want maximum compute throughput and can provide sufficient cooling and power delivery. The AMD processor is for users who need capable performance within a much lower power envelope, as indicated by the 28-watt TDP. The benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the power specification difference creates two distinct deployment scenarios.