AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data shows a clear split between the two processors. The Intel Core i7-14650HX takes the majority of the PassMark workloads, winning 7 of the 11 comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 secures 4 wins. The margins, however, tell a more nuanced story than the raw win count.

Intel's largest advantage appears in the physics workload, where it scores 2202 against AMD's 1772, a delta of 19.5%. This is the single biggest gap in either direction. Floating point math also favors Intel substantially, with a score of 84999 versus 70587, a 17% lead. Prime number finding shows a 15.1% edge for Intel (152 versus 129), and data encryption follows with a 14.4% advantage (22917 versus 19612). These are the workloads where Intel's architectural choices deliver outsized returns.

The AMD processor counters with a 9.9% win in extended instructions, scoring 26544 against Intel's 24150. It also takes single-thread performance with a 3977 score versus 3841, a 3.5% margin. The integer math victory is narrow at just 1% (117832 versus 116661), but it represents a fundamental throughput advantage in that instruction class.

The remaining Intel wins are more moderate. Data compression shows a 6% lead (398418 versus 374429), random string sorting a 5.8% edge (43035 versus 40557), and multithread a 5% advantage (33495 versus 31817). These mid-range deltas suggest consistent, if not dramatic, superiority in memory-heavy and thread-scaled workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark distribution points to distinct usage profiles. The Intel Core i7-14650HX dominates in physics calculations, floating point math, prime number generation, and data encryption. These workloads typically appear in scientific computing, physics simulation, and security-related tasks. The 19.5% physics delta and 17% floating point margin indicate a processor that handles mathematically intensive operations with notably higher efficiency.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 claims extended instruction throughput, single-thread performance, and integer math. The extended instructions win of 9.9% suggests strong SIMD or specialized instruction handling. The 3.5% single-thread advantage matters for lightly threaded applications where per-core responsiveness is critical. The integer math win, while small at 1%, shows AMD can hold its own in general-purpose computing tasks.

Data compression and random string sorting, both Intel wins at 6% and 5.8% respectively, point to memory subsystem efficiency. The multithread score difference of 5% indicates Intel manages thread scaling slightly better overall, despite both processors featuring 24 threads. The data suggests Intel excels in compute-heavy, high-throughput scenarios, while AMD holds advantages in instruction diversity and single-core responsiveness.

Architecture Differences

The two processors take fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-14650HX relies on Intel's 10 nm node. This process gap likely contributes to the AMD chip's 28 W TDP, substantially lower than Intel's 55 W. The die sizes differ as well, with AMD at 233 mm² and Intel at 257 mm².

Core configurations diverge sharply. AMD packs 12 cores and 24 threads using a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid arrangement under the Gorgon Point codename. Intel counters with 16 cores and 24 threads in a Raptor Lake-HX Refresh design. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but L2 differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel doubles that to 2 MB per core. L3 cache shows a significant gap, with Intel offering 30 MB shared versus AMD's 16 MB.

Clock speeds are close. AMD bases at 2.00 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz; Intel bases at 2.20 GHz and boosts to 5.20 GHz. The slight Intel boost advantage aligns with its higher TDP envelope.

Memory support differs in scope. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a rated bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 but has no recorded bandwidth figure. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity favors Intel, which offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, versus AMD's Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics also separate the two. AMD includes a Radeon 890M, while Intel ships UHD Graphics 710. The AMD part uses socket FP8; Intel uses BGA 1964. Intel's multiplier is unlocked, whereas AMD's is not. Release timing shows Intel arriving in January 2024, with AMD's embedded part following in February 2026.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates the Intel Core i7-14650HX is the stronger overall performer in most measured workloads. Its 7 wins out of 11 head-to-head comparisons, combined with a multithread score of 33495 versus 31817, give it a clear performance edge in compute-intensive tasks. The 19.5% physics lead and 17% floating point margin are decisive for users running simulation or mathematical workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 counters with a 3.5% single-thread win and a 9.9% extended instructions advantage. Its 93rd percentile ranking versus Intel's 88th percentile suggests better overall positioning in the broader CPU landscape, despite losing the direct head-to-head. The average benchmark score of 62839 for AMD against 41576 for Intel reflects a different measurement basis, with AMD's closest rival being the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at a 0.2% delta.

The data shows Intel winning in data compression, encryption, prime numbers, floating point math, multithread, physics, and random string sorting. AMD wins in extended instructions, integer math, and single-thread tests. Users prioritizing maximum compute throughput should favor Intel. Users needing stronger single-thread response or specialized instruction handling should consider AMD. The 28 W TDP of the AMD part versus 55 W for Intel also indicates a substantial efficiency difference, though the performance data does not quantify the power trade-off directly.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX wins 7 of the 11 recorded comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins 4.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The physics workload shows the biggest difference, with Intel scoring 2202 against AMD's 1772, a 19.5% advantage.

Q: How do their multithread scores compare?

A: Intel scores 33495 in the PassMark multithread test, which is 5% ahead of AMD's 31817.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any clear advantages?

A: Yes. AMD leads in extended instructions by 9.9% (26544 versus 24150) and in single-thread performance by 3.5% (3977 versus 3841).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads.

Q: How does cache configuration differ?

A: Intel provides 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD provides 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 | Intel Core i7-14650HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 16 |

| Threads | 24 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 55 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRMXH |