AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core i7-13790F Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13790F and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 occupy opposite ends of the computing spectrum, yet their aggregate benchmark scores place them within striking distance of each other. The Intel part, a 16-core desktop processor from the Raptor Lake generation, posts an average benchmark score of 63080, while the AMD mobile chip, built on the Gorgon Point architecture with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, achieves 62839. That 0.4% gap, as measured by deltaPct, makes them direct rivals in overall throughput, but the data reveals a far more one-sided story in individual workloads. The Intel chip wins all 11 head-to-head tests, often by substantial margins, while the AMD part counters with a dramatically lower power envelope and integrated graphics. This is not a close contest in raw performance; it is a study in how different design priorities—desktop muscle versus embedded efficiency—shape benchmark outcomes.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13790F wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison, making the use-case split starkly one-sided. Its dominance is most pronounced in multi-threaded and compute-heavy tasks, where the combination of 16 cores and 24 threads delivers scores that the AMD part cannot approach. The PassMark physics test illustrates this perfectly: Intel scores 3017 against AMD’s 1772, a 70.3% advantage. Similarly, data compression shows Intel at 567473 versus 374429, a 51.6% lead, indicating superior performance in archiving, file compression, and database workloads. For integer math, the Intel chip posts 151416 against 117832, a 28.5% edge, making it the better choice for general-purpose computing, spreadsheet calculations, and software compilation. The single-thread test is the closest contest, with Intel at 4212 and AMD at 3977, a 5.9% delta, but Intel still takes the win, suggesting slightly better responsiveness in lightly threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, despite losing every benchmark, wins on the basis of its 28 W TDP and integrated Radeon 890M graphics. This part is designed for fanless or low-power embedded systems, where the Intel chip’s 65 W TDP would be prohibitive. The AMD part’s 4 nm process node, built by TSMC, and 233 mm² die size enable this efficiency, while its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and support for ECC memory make it suitable for industrial controllers, network appliances, and edge AI inference. In scenarios where power draw and thermal output are the primary constraints—not raw compute—the AMD part is the only viable option. The data shows no performance win for AMD, but the specification sheet reveals a clear win in operational efficiency and platform integration.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The Intel Core i7-13790F uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node from Intel’s own foundry, with a die size of 257 mm². It features 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, by contrast, uses the Gorgon Point codename with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid core layout, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a slightly smaller die at 233 mm². It has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Its cache structure is less generous: 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache.

The memory and I/O configurations diverge sharply. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with PCIe Gen 5 and 20 CPU lanes. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, but with a specific memory bandwidth rating of 89.6 GB/s, and it uses PCIe Gen 4 with only 16 lanes. The AMD part includes integrated Radeon 890M graphics, while the Intel part has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part but not on the Intel part. The Intel chip uses the LGA 1700 socket, while AMD uses the FP8 socket, reflecting their desktop versus mobile positioning. The Intel part launched in February 2023, while the AMD part has a release date of February 2026, indicating a generational gap in design philosophy.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a comprehensive sweep for the Intel Core i7-13790F, with the largest margins in workloads that stress the entire processor. The physics test, which simulates rigid body dynamics and collision detection, shows Intel at 3017 versus AMD’s 1772, a 70.3% delta. This is the single biggest gap in the dataset and highlights the Intel chip’s advantage in floating-point-heavy, multi-threaded simulations. Data encryption follows closely, with Intel at 31703 and AMD at 19612, a 61.7% delta, indicating faster cryptographic operations for secure data handling. Prime number finding, a pure integer workload, shows Intel at 207 versus AMD’s 129, a 60.5% delta, and floating-point math shows Intel at 110512 against 70587, a 56.6% delta. These results point to a processor that extracts more work per clock from each core, despite having 4 more cores than the AMD part.

The multi-thread test, which is a broad measure of parallel performance, shows Intel at 44737 and AMD at 31817, a 40.6% delta. This is consistent with the core count difference, but the margins in other tests suggest Intel’s core architecture is also more efficient per thread. Random string sorting, a memory-latency-sensitive test, shows Intel at 58607 versus 40557, a 44.5% delta, meaning the larger 33 MB L3 cache on Intel helps with data locality. Extended instructions, which tests SIMD and AVX workloads, shows Intel at 34828 against 26544, a 31.2% delta. Integer math, at 151416 versus 117832, is a 28.5% delta, and data compression, at 567473 versus 374429, is a 51.6% delta. The single-thread test is the outlier, with Intel at 4212 and AMD at 3977, a modest 5.9% delta. This shows that in lightly threaded tasks, the two processors are nearly comparable, but the Intel chip still holds the edge.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-13790F has an average benchmark score of 63080, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62839, a difference of 0.4% in favor of Intel.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 better for power-constrained systems?

A: Yes, the AMD part has a TDP of 28 W, compared to the Intel part’s 65 W, making it more suitable for embedded or mobile designs where thermal and power budgets are tight.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13790F support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel part does not support ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 does.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 includes a Radeon 890M integrated GPU, whereas the Intel Core i7-13790F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in the PassMark physics test, where the Intel Core i7-13790F scores 3017 versus 1772 for the AMD part, a 70.3% advantage.

Q: How do the single-thread scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i7-13790F scores 4212 in the single-thread test, while the AMD part scores 3977, a 5.9% delta in favor of Intel.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The Intel Core i7-13790F has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, so the thread count is identical but the core count differs by 4. The base clock is 2.10 GHz on Intel versus 2.00 GHz on AMD, and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz versus 5.10 GHz, giving Intel a 0.10 GHz advantage in both. The TDP is 65 W for Intel and 28 W for AMD, a 37 W difference that reflects their desktop versus mobile design targets. The socket is Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part and AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD part.

The process node is 10 nm on Intel, built by Intel, versus 4 nm on AMD, built by TSMC, and the die size is 257 mm² for Intel and 233 mm² for AMD. The L2 cache is 2 MB per core on Intel versus 1 MB per core on AMD, and the L3 cache is 33 MB shared on Intel versus 16 MB on AMD. Memory support differs with Intel offering DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD offers DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The AMD part has a specified memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel does not list one. ECC memory is true on AMD and false on Intel. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes on Intel versus Gen 4 with 16 lanes on AMD. Integrated graphics are absent on Intel but present as Radeon 890M on AMD. The market segment is Desktop for Intel and Mobile for AMD. The release date is February 2023 for Intel and February 2026 for AMD. The launch MSRP for the Intel part is $441, while the AMD part has no listed MSRP. The part numbers are SRMBZ for Intel and unknown for AMD.