AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Point
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 9 273PQE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 5.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 36 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
374,429
585,752
passmark_data_encryption
19,612
29,636
passmark_extended_instructions
26,544
38,743
passmark_find_prime_numbers
129
198
passmark_floating_point_math
70,587
125,546
passmark_integer_math
117,832
164,629
passmark_multithread
31,817
46,107
passmark_physics
1,772
2,754
passmark_random_string_sorting
40,557
53,167
passmark_single_thread
3,977
4,573
passmark_singlethread
3,977
4,573
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
3,950
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
557
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
16,459
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
2,323
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
39,190
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
5,532

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core 9 273PQE

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a decisive outcome: the Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every head-to-head benchmark in the database. It holds an 11 to 0 win record over the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. The Intel part delivers a higher average benchmark score of 66099, while the AMD part records 62839. Both processors sit at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning they occupy a similar overall performance tier, but the Intel model is consistently faster in every measured workload.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the choice for systems where power delivery and thermal envelope are the primary constraints. Its TDP is 28, versus 125 for the Intel part. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process and a mobile socket, so it fits into compact, low-power designs. The Intel Core 9 273PQE is the choice for desktop builds where maximum throughput matters more than power draw. Its Cinebench results, which are not available for the AMD part, show strong multi-core capability with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39190. The Intel processor also supports PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD part is limited to Gen 4.

The data does not support any scenario where the AMD part wins on performance. It loses by 13% in single-thread tests and by 31% in multi-thread tests. The only sensible reason to pick the AMD part is its much lower power requirement and its integrated Radeon 890M graphics, which may reduce the need for a separate GPU in some embedded or mobile applications.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE boosts to 5.90 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 boosts to 5.10 GHz.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes. Both have 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The biggest gap is in floating point math, where the Intel part scores 125546 versus 70587 for the AMD part, a delta of -43.8% for the AMD chip.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: Only the Intel Core 9 273PQE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD and Intel parts support ECC memory.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 9 273PQE?

A: The launch MSRP is $589. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel's own foundry.

Cache organization differs significantly. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core on the AMD side, but the Intel part doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is the larger difference: the AMD chip has 16 MB, while the Intel chip has 36 MB shared. This larger L3 cache helps explain the Intel part's advantage in data-heavy workloads such as data compression and random string sorting.

The AMD part uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile socket, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. The AMD chip has a die size of 233 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Intel chip. The AMD part uses the Radeon 890M integrated graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. Memory support also diverges: the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are identical, so the meaningful differences lie elsewhere. The base clock is 2.00 GHz on the AMD part versus 3.40 GHz on the Intel part. The boost clock is 5.10 GHz on the AMD part versus 5.90 GHz on the Intel part. The Intel part has a higher TDP of 125, compared to 28 for the AMD part.

Cache is a clear differentiator. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel part has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is 16 MB on the AMD part and 36 MB shared on the Intel part.

Socket and platform are different. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is classified as a Mobile segment product, while the Intel part is Desktop. PCIe support is PCIe Gen 4 on the AMD chip and PCIe Gen 5 on the Intel chip, both with 16 lanes.

The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $589 and a part number of SA4Q9. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP and an unknown part number. The release dates are close, with the AMD part recorded as 2026-02-28 and the Intel part as 2026-03-08. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every recorded head-to-head benchmark. The smallest margin is in single-thread performance, where the Intel part scores 4573 versus 3977 for the AMD part, a 13% difference. The same margin applies to the duplicate single-thread test. The largest margin is in floating point math, where the Intel part scores 125546 versus 70587, a 43.8% advantage.

In integer math, the Intel part scores 164629 against 117832, a 28.4% lead. Data compression shows the Intel part at 585752 versus 374429, a 36.1% lead. Data encryption follows a similar pattern, with the Intel part at 29636 versus 19612, a 33.8% lead. Extended instructions score 38743 for the Intel part versus 26544 for the AMD part, a 31.5% difference.

Multi-thread performance in PassMark shows the Intel part at 46107 versus 31817, a 31% lead. Physics tests show 2754 for the Intel part versus 1772 for the AMD part, a 35.7% lead. Prime number finding shows 198 for the Intel part versus 129, a 34.8% lead. Random string sorting shows 53167 for the Intel part versus 40557, a 23.7% lead.

The Intel part also has Cinebench results recorded, while the AMD part has none. These include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 39190, R23 single-core at 5532, R20 multi-core at 16459, R20 single-core at 2323, R15 multi-core at 3950, and R15 single-core at 557.

The average benchmark score confirms the overall trend. The Intel part averages 66099, while the AMD part averages 62839. The nearest rivals in the database place the Intel part in a stronger neighborhood. The Intel Core 9 273PQE sits just 0.1% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus and 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 sits 0.2% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins every measured workload in the database. That includes single-thread tasks, multi-thread tasks, compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, physics, and random string sorting. The margins range from 13% in single-thread tests to 43.8% in floating point math. The Intel part also delivers Cinebench scores, which are entirely absent from the AMD part's records, indicating a stronger rendering and CPU-bound productivity profile.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has no benchmark wins in the database. Its advantages are structural rather than performance-based. It draws far less power, with a TDP of 28 versus 125. It uses a smaller 4 nm process node, which typically correlates with better efficiency. It is built for the mobile and embedded segment with an FP8 socket, while the Intel part is a desktop processor. The AMD part also uses the Radeon 890M integrated graphics, which may offer different display and media capabilities than Intel's UHD Graphics 770, though no direct GPU benchmarks are recorded in the database.

For a user who needs a low-power embedded processor with ECC memory support and a compact socket, the AMD part is the only sensible option in this comparison. For any workload where raw processing power is the deciding factor, the Intel part is the clear winner. The data shows no workload category where the AMD part catches up or surpasses the Intel part, which makes the Intel Core 9 273PQE the stronger processor in all performance dimensions recorded.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI Embedded P185
9 273PQE
Core Specs
Cores
12
12 0.0%
Threads
24
24 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
3.4 +70.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.9 +15.7%
Frequency (GHz)
2
3.4 +70.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.9 +15.7%
Multiplier
20
34 +70.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
36 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
125 +346.4%
PL1
—
253 W
PL2
—
253 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Codename
Gorgon Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 9 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 8
—
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
—
P-Core Turbo
—
5.5 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 890M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$589
Part Number
unknown
SA4Q9
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
105°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI Embedded P185 Details View Core 9 273PQE Details