AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core 7 253PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and Intel Core 7 253PTE represent two distinct approaches to modern processing, with the former targeting mobile embedded workloads and the latter aimed at desktop systems. The benchmark data reveals a clear performance hierarchy, but the architectural differences explain why each chip exists in its respective market segment.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a dominant performance profile for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. Across the eleven shared PassMark tests, the AMD processor secured ten wins against a single victory for the Intel Core 7 253PTE. The magnitude of these wins varies considerably, from narrow margins to substantial leads.

The largest advantage for the AMD chip appears in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scored 129 versus Intel's 82, a delta of 57.3 percent. This indicates a substantial advantage in integer-heavy, latency-sensitive workloads. Similarly, the extended instructions test shows the AMD part at 26544 against Intel's 17099, a 55.2 percent lead, suggesting superior SIMD and cryptographic instruction throughput.

Data compression benchmarks further illustrate the gap. The AMD processor recorded 374429 points, while the Intel chip managed 275828, a 35.7 percent difference. Random string sorting also favors AMD heavily, with scores of 40557 and 28227 respectively, a 43.7 percent margin. These results point to stronger memory subsystem efficiency and better multi-threaded orchestration on the AMD side.

The PassMark multithread score confirms the trend: AMD at 31817 versus Intel at 25031, a 27.1 percent advantage. The physics test shows a similar pattern, with AMD at 1772 and Intel at 1318, a 34.4 percent lead. In data encryption, AMD's 19612 score tops Intel's 15500 by 26.5 percent.

The floating point math test is the closest contest among AMD's wins. AMD scored 70587 against Intel's 67209, a modest 5 percent margin. Single-thread performance also favors AMD, but narrowly: 3977 versus 3794, a 4.8 percent difference. This suggests the two chips have comparable per-core execution capabilities in some workloads.

The sole Intel victory comes in the PassMark integer math test. Intel scored 119552 against AMD's 117832, a 1.4 percent margin. While this is a narrow win, it demonstrates that the Intel architecture retains an edge in specific integer-heavy code paths, likely due to its higher boost clock.

Architecture Differences

The fundamental design philosophies diverge sharply. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 253PTE, by contrast, uses the Bartlett Lake codename from the Core 7 generation, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD processor offers 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part provides 10 cores and 20 threads. This 20 percent core advantage for AMD directly contributes to its multi-threaded benchmark wins. The cache hierarchy also favors Intel in total capacity: AMD has 16 MB of L3 cache, while Intel carries 33 MB of shared L3. However, AMD's L2 cache is 1 MB per core, half of Intel's 2 MB per core allocation.

Both chips use an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The process node difference is substantial, with AMD at 4 nm versus Intel at 10 nm, which explains the significant thermal and power envelope disparity.

Clock speeds tell a mixed story. The AMD part has a 2.00 GHz base clock and a 5.10 GHz boost clock. Intel starts lower at 1.80 GHz base but boosts higher to 5.40 GHz. The higher Intel boost clock likely explains its narrow integer math win, as single-threaded peak performance benefits from the extra 300 MHz.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel bus with identical 89.6 GB/s bandwidth figures. Both chips support ECC memory. The PCIe interface shows a generational split: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics present another divergence. AMD integrates the Radeon 890M, a high-performance iGPU, while Intel uses the UHD Graphics 730. The Radeon 890M is designed for more demanding visual tasks, which aligns with the mobile segment positioning.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 in most scenarios. Its 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, compared to Intel's 84th percentile, confirms its superior overall standing. The average benchmark score of 62839 for AMD versus 34962 for Intel reflects the substantial performance gap, though the Intel chip sits closer to its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-13800H with a delta of -0.1 percent and the Intel Core i9-12900HX also at -0.1 percent.

For multi-threaded and data-heavy workloads, the AMD processor is the stronger choice. The 27.1 percent multithread lead and the 35.7 percent data compression advantage indicate that tasks involving heavy parallelization will complete faster on the AMD platform. The extended instructions lead of 55.2 percent makes it particularly suitable for cryptographic or vectorized workloads.

The Intel Core 7 253PTE, however, holds its ground in specific single-threaded integer tasks. Its integer math win, while small, suggests that code optimized for high clock speeds and Intel's architecture may see marginal benefits. The higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz provides a theoretical peak that AMD cannot match.

The market segmentation is clear. The AMD chip targets mobile embedded systems with its 28 W TDP, while Intel targets desktop applications with a 45 W TDP. The AMD part's lower power draw, combined with its superior benchmark results, makes it the more efficient performer. The Intel chip's higher TDP and desktop socket (Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket FP8) indicate a different thermal and physical design target.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the difference in single-thread performance?

A: The AMD chip scores 3977 in the PassMark single-thread test, while Intel scores 3794, giving AMD a 4.8 percent advantage.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 7 253PTE wins the PassMark integer math test with a score of 119552 versus AMD's 117832, a 1.4 percent margin.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry.

Q: How does the memory bandwidth compare?

A: Both processors support dual-channel memory with an identical 89.6 GB/s bandwidth figure. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 dominates in multi-threaded and data-processing workloads. Its wins in data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, multithread, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread tests make it the clear choice for embedded systems handling diverse computational tasks. The 57.3 percent lead in prime number finding and the 55.2 percent lead in extended instructions are particularly notable for scientific and cryptographic applications.

The Intel Core 7 253PTE has a single but meaningful victory in integer math. This result indicates that workloads heavily reliant on integer arithmetic, where the 5.40 GHz boost clock can be fully utilized, may see slight benefits on the Intel platform. The 1.4 percent margin is small, but for applications where every percent matters, this could be a deciding factor.

The data also shows that the AMD processor's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX with a 0.2 percent delta and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 with a 0.5 percent delta, are extremely close in average score. This suggests the AMD chip sits at the top of a tightly clustered performance group. The Intel Core 7 253PTE similarly sits close to its rivals, including the Intel Core i7-13800H and Intel Core i9-12900HX, both with -0.1 percent deltas, indicating it is a competitive part within its own segment.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE uses the Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, the Intel chip a 45 W TDP. AMD's die size is 233 mm², while Intel's is not recorded.

The AMD processor offers 16 MB of L3 cache, while Intel provides 33 MB. AMD's L2 cache is 1 MB per core, Intel's is 2 MB per core. Both share an 80 KB per core L1 cache.

AMD's integrated graphics is the Radeon 890M; Intel's is the UHD Graphics 730. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both handle dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC; the Intel part uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost of 5.10 GHz; the Intel part has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost of 5.40 GHz.

The Intel Core 7 253PTE has a launch MSRP of $384. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The Intel part number is SA4QK, while the AMD part number is unknown. Both processors have locked multipliers.