AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core 5 220H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data delivers a decisive verdict: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins every single recorded head-to-head comparison against the Intel Core 5 220H. Across all 11 shared PassMark tests, the AMD processor takes the lead, with margins ranging from a modest 16.8% to a commanding 81.3%. The Intel part records zero wins in the direct comparison set.

The largest gap appears in the extended instructions test, where the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 26,544 against Intel's 14,642, a delta of 81.3%. This indicates a substantial advantage in workloads that leverage advanced instruction sets, likely reflecting the newer Zen 5 architecture's capabilities. Integer math follows closely, with AMD posting 117,832 versus Intel's 73,555, a 60.2% lead. This suggests AMD handles arithmetic-heavy tasks with significantly greater efficiency.

Data compression shows a 51% advantage for AMD (374,429 vs. 247,921), a meaningful difference for database workloads, file archiving, and any application that moves large amounts of data through compression algorithms. Random string sorting also favors AMD by 42.6% (40,557 vs. 28,438), reinforcing the pattern of superior throughput in data manipulation tasks.

Multithreaded performance, often the headline metric for productivity processors, shows AMD ahead by 45.4% with a score of 31,817 versus Intel's 21,884. This broad performance gap stems from the AMD part's 24 threads compared to Intel's 16, even though both processors have 12 physical cores. The extra threads allow AMD to process more concurrent work streams, which shows up clearly in the multithread result.

Floating-point math, critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering, goes to AMD by 36.6% (70,587 vs. 51,671). Find prime numbers, a test sensitive to integer throughput and core efficiency, shows AMD ahead by 57.3% (129 vs. 82). Data encryption favors AMD by 28.9% (19,612 vs. 15,216), indicating faster cryptographic operations, which matters for VPNs, secure storage, and network services.

Physics simulation scores show the narrowest gap, with AMD leading by 19.9% (1,772 vs. 1,478). This test often responds to clock speed and per-core efficiency rather than raw thread count, and the AMD part's 5.10 GHz boost clock versus Intel's 4.90 GHz helps explain the advantage, though the margin remains smaller than in other workloads.

Single-thread performance, the metric that governs everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications, goes to AMD by 16.8% (3,977 vs. 3,405). This is the closest result in the entire comparison, yet it still confirms that AMD holds the edge even when only one core is active. The consistent single-thread lead, combined with the massive multithread advantage, means AMD wins in both lightly and heavily threaded scenarios.

The average benchmark scores in the database reinforce the overall picture. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 records an average score of 62,839, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 220H averages 28,574, sitting in the 80th percentile. The gap between these averages is substantial, reflecting the AMD part's dominance across the full benchmark suite.

Where Each One Wins

Given the head-to-head results, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins in every measured category. The database records 11 wins for AMD and zero for Intel across the shared PassMark tests. This means there is no benchmark category in this comparison where the Intel Core 5 220H comes out ahead.

For multi-threaded productivity, the AMD part's 24 threads provide a clear structural advantage over Intel's 16 threads. Applications that scale across many threads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, will benefit from the 45.4% multithread lead. The data compression and random string sorting results also point to strong performance in data-centric workflows, with AMD leading by 51% and 42.6% respectively.

For single-threaded tasks, AMD still holds the advantage with a 16.8% lead. This covers everyday applications like web browsing, office productivity, and light scripting, where a single core often determines responsiveness. The 5.10 GHz boost clock on the AMD part, higher than Intel's 4.90 GHz, contributes to this outcome.

The extended instructions result, an 81.3% lead for AMD, indicates that workloads using modern SIMD or specialized instruction sets will see the largest relative benefit from choosing the AMD processor. This includes tasks like cryptography, certain scientific calculations, and media processing that leverage advanced CPU instructions.

The Intel Core 5 220H does not win any recorded benchmark category. Its strengths lie outside the measured tests, such as its support for DDR4 memory, which can lower platform costs, and its PCIe Gen 5 interface, which offers higher bandwidth per lane. However, within the PassMark suite, Intel trails in every metric.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has an average benchmark score of 62,839, while the Intel Core 5 220H averages 28,574.

Q: How large is the multithread performance gap?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 31,817 in the PassMark multithread test, which is 45.4% higher than the Intel Core 5 220H's score of 21,884.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any of the shared benchmark tests?

A: No. The database records 11 wins for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and 0 wins for the Intel Core 5 220H across all head-to-head PassMark tests.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 3,977 in single-thread tests, a 16.8% advantage over the Intel Core 5 220H's 3,405.

Q: How do the processors compare in data encryption performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 19,612 in data encryption, which is 28.9% higher than the Intel Core 5 220H's 15,216.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 220H ranks in the 80th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 220H has 12 cores and 16 threads. This thread count difference is a major factor in the multithread performance gap.

Base clock speeds favor Intel, with the Core 5 220H starting at 2.70 GHz compared to AMD's 2.00 GHz. However, boost clocks favor AMD, with the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 reaching 5.10 GHz versus Intel's 4.90 GHz. The lower base clock on AMD likely contributes to its lower thermal design power, which is 28 watts compared to Intel's 45 watts.

Memory support differs significantly. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD also lists ECC memory support, which Intel lacks. The memory bandwidth for AMD is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is listed for Intel.

PCIe connectivity differs in both generation and lane count. AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes. This trade-off means Intel has newer PCIe technology but fewer lanes, while AMD has more lanes of an older standard.

The integrated graphics differ as well, with AMD using the Radeon 890M and Intel using Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. Both processors use different sockets: AMD Socket FP8 for the Ryzen part and Intel BGA 1744 for the Core 5.

The Intel Core 5 220H has a launch MSRP of $342, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. The release dates also differ, with Intel releasing on 2024-12-17 and AMD on 2026-02-28.

Architecture Differences

The architecture divide is significant. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-H, and belongs to the Core 5 generation described as Raptor Lake Refresh.

The manufacturing process differs substantially. AMD fabricates its processor on a 4 nm node at TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm node at its own foundry. The smaller process node typically allows higher transistor density and better power efficiency, which aligns with AMD's lower 28-watt TDP.

Cache configurations differ in the L2 and L3 levels. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. For L2 cache, AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel provides 2 MB per core. At the L3 level, AMD offers 16 MB, while Intel offers 18 MB shared. The Intel part has more total cache, but AMD's architecture appears to use it more efficiently based on benchmark results.

The die size is recorded only for AMD at 233 mm², with no figure listed for Intel. The AMD processor supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Intel part. This makes AMD more suitable for error-sensitive workloads like data servers or financial computations.

The integrated graphics solutions reflect different design philosophies. AMD uses its Radeon 890M, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. Both provide integrated display output, but their performance characteristics fall outside the recorded PassMark CPU benchmarks.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 outperforms the Intel Core 5 220H in every measured benchmark category. With 11 wins and zero losses in the head-to-head comparison, the AMD processor delivers superior results across data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating-point math, integer math, multithreaded workloads, physics simulation, random string sorting, and single-thread performance.

The average benchmark scores confirm this dominance. The AMD part's 62,839 average places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part's 28,574 average sits in the 80th percentile. The nearest rivals to AMD include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62,738 (0.2% behind) and the Intel Core i7-13790F at 63,080 (0.4% ahead), showing that AMD competes with significantly more expensive or higher-tier processors. The Intel Core 5 220H's nearest rivals, such as the AMD EPYC 7203P at 28,583 and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS at 28,549, are in a much lower performance tier.

For users prioritizing raw processing power, especially in multithreaded and data-intensive workloads, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the clear choice from the data. Its 24 threads, higher boost clock, and 45.4% multithread advantage make it suitable for demanding professional applications. The 81.3% lead in extended instructions further strengthens its position for specialized computational tasks.

The Intel Core 5 220H offers a lower base clock and higher TDP, but it does provide DDR4 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. These features may appeal to specific platform requirements, but they do not translate into benchmark wins. The Intel part's 16 threads and 4.90 GHz boost clock place it in a lower performance bracket, as reflected in its 80th percentile ranking.

The launch timeline also matters. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 releases on 2026-02-28, while the Intel Core 5 220H released on 2024-12-17. The AMD processor arrives later with a newer architecture and process node, which explains its performance advantage. The Intel part has been available longer and carries a launch MSRP of $342, but the performance gap in the database is substantial enough that the price difference may not compensate for the lower benchmark results.