AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core 3 100UL Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 compare to the Intel Core 3 100UL in overall benchmark positioning?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 sits at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 62,839. The Intel Core 3 100UL sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded average benchmark score, indicating a substantial gap in measured performance.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What process nodes are used by these two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 100UL uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 boosts up to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 100UL boosts up to 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 3 100UL does not.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel Core 3 100UL uses Intel Socket 1700.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and Intel Core 3 100UL represent two fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD part, codenamed Gorgon Point, belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It uses a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 3 100UL, codenamed Raptor Lake-PS, uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process at Intel. This process node difference is significant, with AMD's chip using a far more advanced manufacturing process that allows for higher transistor density and improved efficiency per clock.

The core configurations differ substantially. The AMD processor provides 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor provides 6 cores and 8 threads. This reflects a hybrid core arrangement for AMD, combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores for a balance of performance and efficiency. The Intel part uses a more conventional setup for a low-power desktop chip. The cache hierarchy also differs. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but AMD uses 1 MB of L2 per core while Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 10 MB shared for Intel, giving AMD a 6 MB advantage in last-level cache.

Memory support shows clear differences. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, has no recorded memory bandwidth figure, and does not support ECC. PCIe connectivity also differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This gives AMD twice the CPU-attached PCIe lanes for expansion devices.

The integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 890M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 64EU. The AMD solution is positioned for more demanding graphics workloads. The market segments reflect the design intent: AMD targets mobile with this part, while Intel targets desktop.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data between these two processors is not available in the recorded measurements. However, the database provides extensive benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 that establish its performance profile. The Intel Core 3 100UL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, making direct numerical comparison impossible for individual tests.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 delivers an average benchmark score of 62,839, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX with an average score of 62,738 (0.2% behind the AMD part), the Intel Core i7-13790F with 63,080 (0.4% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX with 63,173 (0.5% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 with 62,498 (0.5% behind). This places the AMD processor in a competitive band with high-end desktop and mobile chips.

Specific benchmark results for the AMD part show strong performance across workloads. In PassMark data compression, it scores 374,429. Data encryption yields 19,612. Extended instructions score 26,544. Find prime numbers scores 129. Floating point math scores 70,587. Integer math scores 117,832. The multithread score is 31,817, and the physics score is 1,772. Random string sorting scores 40,557. Single-thread performance is 3,977.

The Intel Core 3 100UL has no benchmark scores recorded, which means the database cannot quantify its performance in any of these tests. The percentile ranking of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs, but without specific scores, the delta between the two parts cannot be expressed numerically.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 | Intel Core 3 100UL |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 6 |

| Threads | 24 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 10 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 64EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-04-07 |

The base clock difference is substantial: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz versus Intel's 1.20 GHz. The boost clocks also favor AMD by 0.60 GHz. TDP figures show Intel at 15 W versus AMD at 28 W, reflecting different power envelopes. The AMD chip uses a dual-channel memory bus with DDR5 and LPDDR5X support, while Intel's dual-channel bus accepts DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part offers ECC support, which Intel lacks.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins in every measurable performance category. The processor's 12 cores and 24 threads provide a clear advantage for heavily threaded workloads such as data compression, where it scores 374,429, and integer math, where it scores 117,832. The 5.10 GHz boost clock supports strong single-thread performance, recorded at 3,977 in the PassMark single-thread test. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 MB L3 cache further support memory-intensive applications.

The AMD part's mobile market segment and 28 W TDP make it suitable for compact systems that need high compute density. The Radeon 890M integrated graphics and 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for flexible expansion and graphics output without a discrete GPU. ECC memory support makes it viable for reliability-sensitive workloads where data integrity matters.

The Intel Core 3 100UL has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot confirm any performance wins for this processor. Its advantages are structural rather than measured. The 15 W TDP is lower than AMD's 28 W, indicating a more power-efficient design for thermally constrained environments. The desktop market segment and Intel Socket 1700 platform compatibility may suit systems designed around that socket. DDR4 memory support provides an upgrade path for older memory platforms. The smaller L2 allocation per core at 1.25 MB versus AMD's 1 MB could theoretically benefit certain workloads, but no measured data confirms this advantage.

The Verdict

The recorded data strongly favors the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 for any performance-oriented use case. Its 93rd percentile ranking, average benchmark score of 62,839, and competitive positioning against high-end Intel Core Ultra parts confirm its capability. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration with a 5.10 GHz boost clock delivers a level of compute throughput that the Intel Core 3 100UL cannot match based on available measurements.

For users who need maximum processing power in a mobile form factor, the AMD part is the clear choice. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, 16 MB L3 cache, and 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide a robust platform for demanding applications. ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive workloads.

The Intel Core 3 100UL suits scenarios where power consumption is the primary constraint. Its 15 W TDP is significantly lower than the AMD part's 28 W, making it appropriate for fanless or passively cooled designs. The desktop socket and DDR4 compatibility may fit existing system platforms. However, with no recorded benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking, the database cannot substantiate any performance claims for this processor.

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 delivers performance comparable to high-end desktop processors from the Core i7 and Core Ultra families, while the Intel Core 3 100UL sits at the median of all CPUs without measurable performance data. Any decision between these two should be driven by platform requirements and power budgets, since the performance gap is decisively in AMD's favor.