AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Processor N150 includes four Cinebench results. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark scores in the database, meaning a direct score comparison cannot be performed. The Intel Processor N150 posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 2590.5 and a single-core score of 935. In the older Cinebench R15 test, the Intel chip scores 422.5 in multicore and 153.15 in single-core. The average benchmark score for the Intel Processor N150 is 1025, with a percentile rank of 28 against all CPUs in the database.

The absence of recorded benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is notable. The database shows a percentile of 50 for the AMD part, but no average score is listed. This creates an incomplete head-to-head picture. The Intel N150's nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T sits at an average score of 1024, just 0.1% below the N150. The Intel Core i3-4340 scores 1026, which is 0.1% above. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U matches at 1024 with a 0.1% delta, while the Intel Core i7-5650U reaches 1027, 0.2% higher. These clustered scores indicate the N150 operates in a performance band where small margins separate competitors.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It packs 10 cores and 20 threads, a substantial count for a mobile embedded processor. The base clock registers at 2.00 GHz with a boost clock reaching 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 28 watts. The chip is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². Cache allocation includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3.

The Intel Processor N150 uses the Twin Lake architecture, part of the Intel Processor generation based on Alder Lake-N. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The TDP is 6 watts. Intel fabricates this chip on a 10 nm process at their own foundry. Cache structure differs significantly: 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The die size is not recorded in the database.

Memory support separates the two clearly. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 but only through a single-channel bus, delivering 38.4 GB/s. The AMD processor supports ECC memory; the Intel processor does not. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel chip uses Gen 3 with 9 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 includes Radeon 880M graphics. The Intel Processor N150 carries UHD Graphics 730. Both target the mobile market segment and are listed as Active in production status. The release dates show the Intel part launched on 2024-11-19, while the AMD part is dated 2026-02-28. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Processor N150 wins in power efficiency based on the recorded data. Its 6 watt TDP is a fraction of the AMD part's 28 watt envelope. For fanless designs, small embedded systems, or battery-sensitive mobile devices, the lower power draw is a decisive advantage. The N150 also holds the only recorded benchmark scores in this comparison, giving it a measurable performance baseline in Cinebench R15 and R23.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 wins on raw compute resources. Ten cores and twenty threads dwarf the Intel part's 4 cores and 4 threads. The 5.00 GHz boost clock exceeds the Intel's 3.60 GHz maximum. The dual-channel memory interface with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth more than doubles the Intel's 38.4 GB/s throughput. The larger 16 MB L3 cache versus 6 MB suggests better handling of repeated data access patterns. ECC memory support positions the AMD chip for reliability-critical workloads.

The PCIe generation gap matters for I/O-heavy applications. Gen 4 with 16 lanes offers more bandwidth and more connectivity options than Gen 3 with 9 lanes. The AMD part's 4 nm process node versus Intel's 10 nm node indicates a manufacturing advantage that could translate to density and efficiency at the transistor level, though the higher TDP suggests the AMD design prioritizes performance over power savings.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Processor N150 has a TDP of 6 watts.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: The AMD processor supports dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor uses single-channel memory with 38.4 GB/s.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor N150 does not.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors use?

A: The AMD processor features Radeon 880M graphics. The Intel processor features UHD Graphics 730.

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the Intel Processor N150?

A: Cinebench R15 multicore scores 422.5, R15 single-core scores 153.15, R23 multicore scores 2590.5, and R23 single-core scores 935. The average benchmark score is 1025.

Q: When did each processor launch?

A: The Intel Processor N150 launched on 2024-11-19. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is dated 2026-02-28.

The Verdict

The data indicates two processors designed for different priorities. The Intel Processor N150 delivers measurable benchmark results with a 6 watt TDP, making it suitable for power-constrained embedded applications where the recorded Cinebench scores provide a proven performance floor. Its percentile rank of 28 places it below the median of all CPUs in the database, and its nearest rivals cluster within 0.2% of its average score, showing it competes with older desktop and mobile parts from roughly a decade ago.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers a more ambitious specification sheet: 10 cores, 20 threads, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X memory, ECC support, PCIe Gen 4, and a 28 watt TDP. The absence of benchmark scores in the database means performance cannot be verified directly. The percentile rank of 50 suggests an expected median position, but the lack of measured data leaves that as an assumption.

For embedded systems prioritizing low power and proven performance, the Intel Processor N150 has the recorded data to support selection. For workloads requiring many threads, high memory bandwidth, ECC reliability, or newer PCIe connectivity, the AMD part's specifications indicate superior capability, though no benchmark confirmation exists in the database. The choice depends on whether the application needs the Intel's efficiency and verified scores or the AMD's theoretical compute headroom.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Processor N150 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 4 |

| Threads | 20 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 0.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 6 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1264 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 3, 9 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-11-19 |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRPNR |