AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i9-14900F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not include any direct benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. The database shows an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50 among all CPUs, with no entries in its benchmark array. In contrast, the Intel Core i9-14900F has a substantial set of measured results across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests. Its average benchmark score is 60008, which places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database.

The Intel Core i9-14900F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and a single-core score of 5583. In Cinebench R20, it records 16611 multi-core and 2344 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 3986 multi-core and 562 single-core. Geekbench results are 20008 multi-core and 2570 single-core. Passmark tests show 46532 for multithread, 4506 for single thread, 177066 for integer math, 119550 for floating point math, 31084 for extended instructions, 564207 for data compression, 34644 for data encryption, 63728 for random string sorting, 209 for find prime numbers, and 2899 for physics.

Since the AMD part has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The Intel part is the only one with measurable performance data, and the gap cannot be quantified in percentage terms. The data indicates that the Intel Core i9-14900F is the only processor in this comparison with verified performance results, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no recorded scores to compare against. The nearest rival data for the Intel part shows it is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX at a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at +0.6%, and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at -0.9%. This places the Core i9-14900F in a competitive cluster of high-end processors, but none of these rivals are the AMD part in question.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing ecosystems. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14900F is a Raptor Lake-R part from the Core 14th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake architecture. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

The core configurations differ sharply. The AMD part has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel part has 24 cores and 32 threads. That difference in thread count is significant for heavily parallel workloads, but the AMD part operates within a 28 W TDP envelope, whereas the Intel part is rated at 65 W TDP. The base clocks are identical at 2.00 GHz for both, but the boost clock differs: 5.00 GHz for AMD and 5.80 GHz for Intel.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part therefore has a larger total cache footprint, which can benefit workloads with large working sets.

The process node difference is notable: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The die sizes are 233 mm² for the AMD part and 257 mm² for the Intel part. Both are active production parts, but they target different market segments. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is classified as a mobile part, while the Intel Core i9-14900F is a desktop part.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity is another differentiator. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part includes an integrated Radeon 880M graphics solution, while the Intel part has no integrated graphics listed. The release dates are far apart: the AMD part entered the database with a release date of 2026-02-28, while the Intel part has a release date of 2024-01-07.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F boosts to 5.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz. Both have a 2.00 GHz base clock.

Q: Does the AMD part include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a Radeon 880M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i9-14900F has no integrated graphics listed in the database.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, and both support ECC memory.

Q: Is there benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174?

A: The database shows no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rival entries. The Intel Core i9-14900F has 19 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core i9-14900F |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | null | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 10 | 24 |

| Threads | 20 | 32 |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | null | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | N/A |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | null | $524 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | false | false |

| Part Number | unknown | SRN3W |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 92 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 60008 |

The base clock is identical at 2.00 GHz for both, so it is not listed in the difference table. L1 cache is also identical at 80 KB per core. Both support ECC memory, both have a dual-channel memory bus, both are active production parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on use case and workload profile. The Intel Core i9-14900F is the only part in this comparison with measured performance data. Its 92nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 60008 place it among high-end desktop processors. The nearest rival data shows it performing within 0.9% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, and Intel Xeon Gold 6338T. For applications that depend on multi-threaded throughput, the 24 cores, 32 threads, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache give it a structural advantage. The 5.80 GHz boost clock also supports single-thread responsiveness.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 presents a different profile. It is a mobile-class part with a 28 W TDP, 10 cores, 20 threads, and a 16 MB L3 cache. Its integrated Radeon 880M graphics and support for LPDDR5X memory indicate a design aimed at embedded or mobile systems where power draw and physical footprint matter more than raw compute. The 4 nm TSMC process node and 233 mm² die size suggest a denser, more power-efficient implementation than the Intel part. The absence of any benchmark scores in the database means its actual performance cannot be quantified from the recorded data.

The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i9-14900F is $524. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed. The Intel part was released on 2024-01-07, while the AMD part has a release date of 2026-02-28. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

For a desktop builder seeking verified multi-core performance, the Intel Core i9-14900F is the only option in this pair with recorded results. Its benchmark scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark are all present in the database. For an embedded or mobile system that requires integrated graphics, lower power draw, and a smaller process node, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers those characteristics, but its performance remains unmeasured in the database. The choice between the two rests entirely on whether the workload matches the Intel part's verified compute capacity or the AMD part's embedded and mobile design parameters. No benchmark evidence exists to support a performance comparison in favor of the AMD part.