AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel chip offers double the core count and 40% more threads.

Q: What are the peak boost clocks of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel part holds a 0.40 GHz advantage in maximum clock speed.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 16 MB of L3 cache. Intel's cache is more than double the size.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor include?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 includes Radeon 880M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i7-14700F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A).

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-14700F uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip's process node is significantly smaller.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i7-14700F?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has a launch MSRP of $359. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 belongs to the Gorgon Point generation, built on a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core arrangement. This architecture combines high-performance cores with high-efficiency cores, allowing the processor to scale power consumption dynamically. The 4 nm TSMC process node enables a die size of 233 mm², and the chip is designed for the mobile market segment, using AMD Socket FP8.

The Intel Core i7-14700F comes from the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, with a Raptor Lake architecture. It uses a 10 nm Intel process node with a die size of 257 mm², making it physically larger than the AMD part. This processor targets the desktop market segment and uses Intel Socket 1700. The Intel chip also features a larger die despite using a larger process node, indicating a more complex core layout.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially between the two. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip provides 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel chip doubles that to 2 MB per core. In L3 cache, Intel holds a significant advantage with 33 MB shared, compared to AMD's 16 MB. This difference in cache allocation reflects different approaches to memory latency management and data throughput.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i7-14700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation. The AMD processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Intel's implementation offers a newer PCIe standard, which can be relevant for high-bandwidth peripherals.

The Intel Core i7-14700F has a part number of SRN3Z and a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a TDP of 28 watts and a listed part number of "unknown." The release dates place the Intel chip earlier, with a release date in January 2024, while the AMD chip is dated for late February 2026. Both processors are listed as Active in production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core i7-14700F but no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174. The head-to-head comparison therefore relies entirely on Intel's recorded data, with the AMD chip's performance remaining unmeasured in the database.

In Cinebench R15, the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 3540 in multicore and 499 in singlecore. These results establish a baseline for its rendering capabilities. Moving to Cinebench R20, the Intel chip scores 14751 in multicore and 2082 in singlecore. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score rises to 35122 and the singlecore score reaches 4958.

Geekbench results show the Intel processor scoring 19620 in multicore and 2429 in singlecore. These figures indicate strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

The Passmark suite provides a broader view of the Intel chip's capabilities. In data compression, it scores 505885. Data encryption yields 30144. Extended instructions produce 28564. Finding prime numbers results in 176. Floating point math scores 107005. Integer math reaches 155808. The multithread score is 41317, while physics scores 2455. Random string sorting produces 55918. Single thread performance is listed as 4257 in both the single_thread and singlethread tests.

The Intel Core i7-14700F holds an average benchmark score of 53620 and sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P with an average score of 53701 (a delta of -0.2%), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53469 (delta of 0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53288 (delta of 0.6%), and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206 (delta of 0.8%). These tight margins, all within one percentage point, indicate that the Intel Core i7-14700F performs in the upper tier of desktop processors.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs, exactly at the median, but with an average benchmark score of 0 due to the absence of recorded benchmark results. Without measured data, the database cannot quantify the AMD chip's performance relative to the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 | Intel Core i7-14700F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 20 |

| Threads | 20 | 28 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | N/A |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $359 |

The Intel chip offers more cores, threads, higher clocks, more cache, newer PCIe, and a wider memory compatibility range. The AMD chip offers a smaller process node, integrated graphics, lower TDP, and higher memory bandwidth.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700F wins decisively in raw multi-threaded performance potential based on its core configuration. With 20 cores and 28 threads, it has double the core count of the AMD part. Its 33 MB of L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 per core provide a substantial cache advantage that can benefit workloads with large working sets. The higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz also gives it an edge in single-threaded tasks, supported by its Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 4958.

The Intel chip's PCIe Gen 5 support provides a bandwidth advantage for high-speed storage and expansion cards. Its DDR4 and DDR5 dual memory support offers flexibility in platform configuration. The 91st percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 53620 place it among the top processors in the database, with nearest rivals within one percentage point.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 28-watt TDP is less than half of the Intel chip's 65-watt TDP, making it suitable for compact or thermally constrained environments. The integrated Radeon 880M graphics eliminate the need for a separate GPU in basic display scenarios. The 4 nm process node and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth indicate a modern, power-conscious design. The LPDDR5X memory support allows for low-power memory configurations common in mobile systems.

The AMD chip's mobile market segment and smaller form factor suggest it targets embedded or portable applications, where its lower power draw and integrated graphics are primary advantages. The Intel chip's desktop segment and higher TDP indicate it is designed for performance-oriented builds where power consumption is less of a constraint.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors aimed at entirely different use cases. The Intel Core i7-14700F is a high-performance desktop processor with measured benchmark results that place it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 53620, combined with scores like 35122 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 41317 in Passmark multithread, demonstrates strong all-around capability. The nearest rival data, with deltas of -0.2% to 0.8%, confirms that this chip competes at the top tier of desktop processors.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 16 MB L3 cache indicate a mid-range processor in terms of raw throughput. The design priorities are clearly different: the 28-watt TDP, integrated Radeon 880M graphics, and LPDDR5X memory support point toward power-sensitive embedded or mobile applications.

For users selecting a desktop processor for heavy multi-threaded workloads, rendering, or content creation, the Intel Core i7-14700F is the clear choice based on measured data. Its core count, cache size, and benchmark scores all favor it. The launch MSRP of $359 places it in the mainstream desktop segment.

For applications requiring low power consumption, integrated graphics, and a compact mobile footprint, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 offers those features, but the database does not contain performance measurements to validate its throughput capabilities. The choice between these two processors should depend on whether the priority is maximum measured performance or power-efficient integration.