AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core i5-14600T. The benchmark database lists a full suite of 19 test results for the Intel part, while the AMD processor has no individual benchmark scores recorded. This makes a direct, test-by-test comparison impossible from the available facts.

What can be established from the database is the Intel Core i5-14600T's measured performance profile across multiple workloads, and its position relative to other processors. The Intel chip achieves a 22,447 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,169 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9,427 multi-core and 1,330 single-core. Older Cinebench R15 results show 2,262 multi-core and 319 single-core. Geekbench results record 12,840 multi-core and 2,559 single-core.

The Passmark suite provides additional granularity. The Intel processor scores 26,409 in multithreaded tests, 3,744 in single-thread, 95,112 in integer math, 64,726 in floating-point math, 301,827 in data compression, 18,226 in data encryption, 16,985 in extended instructions, 34,310 in random string sorting, 1,873 in physics, and 121 in find prime numbers.

The Intel part's average benchmark score is 32,707, which places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, according to the database's rival comparison fields, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with an average score of 32,697 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F at 32,750 with a delta of -0.1 percent, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32,662 with a delta of 0.1 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32,812 with a delta of -0.3 percent. These deltas indicate that the i5-14600T sits within a very tight performance cluster, essentially tied with all four rivals within a 0.3 percent band.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals recorded in the database. Its percentile versus all CPUs is listed at 50, which is a neutral midpoint and does not reflect measured performance. Without scores, the database cannot confirm any performance claims for the AMD part relative to the Intel part or any other processor.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database records zero benchmark entries for the AMD processor, with an average benchmark score of 0. The Intel Core i5-14600T has 19 recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14600T's best multi-core result?

A: Its highest multi-core score is 22,447 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Passmark multithread results show 26,409.

Q: How close is the Intel Core i5-14600T to its nearest rivals?

A: The delta percentages are 0 percent versus the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, -0.1 percent versus the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F, 0.1 percent versus the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, and -0.3 percent versus the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. All four rivals are effectively within a statistical tie.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores. Both have 20 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T boosts to 5.10 GHz, slightly higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174's 5.00 GHz. The AMD part has a higher base clock at 2.00 GHz versus 1.80 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core i5-14600T list ECC memory support as true.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600T wins in every category where recorded data exists, since the AMD processor has no benchmark results to compare. The Intel part demonstrates a broad workload capability across rendering, general productivity, and math-heavy tasks. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,447 indicates strong sustained multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 3,169 shows competitive single-thread responsiveness. Passmark integer math at 95,112 and floating-point math at 64,726 point to solid computational throughput.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 cannot be declared a winner in any measured category based on available database facts. The absence of recorded scores means its performance profile is unknown. The database does list its market segment as Mobile and production status as Active, but those fields do not constitute performance data.

The Intel part's 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs indicates that it outperforms the large majority of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 32,707 and the tight delta band around its nearest rivals confirm a stable, well-measured performance position. The AMD part's 50th percentile is a default midpoint value, not a measured result, so it should not be interpreted as a performance ranking.

For users looking at measured outcomes, the Intel Core i5-14600T is the only one of the two with a documented performance record. The AMD processor's capabilities remain unquantified in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600T uses 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD part and 1.80 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 5.10 GHz for Intel.

Thermal design power differs significantly: the AMD processor is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel processor is rated at 35 watts. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process technology also differs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14600T is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 257 mm².

Cache configurations differ as well. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3.

Memory support diverges: the AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel. The AMD part lists memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no memory bandwidth figure recorded. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ. The AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

Market segment and release timing also differ. The AMD processor is classified as Mobile and was released on 2026-02-28. The Intel processor is classified as Desktop and was released on 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $255. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.

The Intel part has a part number of SRN46. The AMD part's part number is listed as unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is built on the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation using Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14600T is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core i5 generation labeled Raptor Lake Refresh.

The process nodes reflect different manufacturing approaches. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process, while Intel uses its own 10 nm process. The AMD die measures 233 mm², while the Intel die measures 257 mm².

Core organization differs in cache hierarchy. The AMD part provides 1 MB of L2 per core and a 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel part provides 2 MB of L2 per core and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. Both parts offer 80 KB of L1 per core.

PCIe architecture differs by generation. The AMD processor supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. This gives the Intel part a newer interconnect standard.

Memory architecture shows a split in supported standards. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, with no bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD part's LPDDR5X support indicates a mobile-oriented design, consistent with its Mobile market segment classification.

The integrated graphics solutions reflect different design priorities. AMD uses the Radeon 880M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The database does not include benchmark results for either integrated GPU.

The AMD processor's 28-watt TDP, combined with its mobile segment classification and FP8 socket, suggests a design aimed at embedded and mobile platforms. The Intel processor's 35-watt TDP, LGA 1700 socket, and desktop segment classification indicate a traditional desktop-oriented part. Release dates reinforce this: the Intel part launched in January 2024, while the AMD part is dated February 2026.

The database does not record transistor counts for either processor, so no comparison can be made on that front. Neither processor has a 3D V-Cache option recorded. The AMD part's generation listing specifically names Zen 5 and Zen 5c core types, indicating a hybrid core arrangement, while the Intel part's Raptor Lake-R generation implies the standard Raptor Lake core configuration without further detail in the database.