AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

# Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and Intel Core i5-14500T target different workloads and design priorities. The Intel part holds the advantage in raw multi-threaded throughput across the recorded Cinebench suite. Its multicore scores of 2022 in Cinebench R15, 8177 in R20, and 11790 in R23 demonstrate sustained performance under heavy parallel load. The AMD part, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, which places its measured performance entirely in the hands of architectural specifications rather than empirical results.

Single-thread performance also favors the Intel Core i5-14500T in the available data. The Intel chip records 252 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1154 in R20 single-core, and 1838 in R23 single-core. These numbers position it as a strong performer in lightly threaded applications such as legacy productivity tools and certain simulation workloads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, with its 5.00 GHz boost clock, may theoretically compete, but without recorded scores, the database cannot confirm this.

The AMD part wins in power efficiency and platform integration. Its 28 W TDP is lower than the Intel part's 35 W TDP, and it integrates the Radeon 880M graphics solution. The Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. For embedded and mobile deployments where thermal headroom is limited and graphical output is required without a discrete GPU, the AMD part has the advantage. The AMD processor also supports LPDDR5X memory, which the Intel chip does not list, making the AMD part a better fit for compact, low-power systems that rely on soldered memory.

The Intel part takes the win in memory flexibility. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part only lists DDR5 and LPDDR5X. This makes the Intel chip more adaptable for upgrades and system refreshes that reuse existing DDR4 modules. The Intel chip also holds a higher percentile rank at 80, compared to the AMD part's 50, indicating that the database places the Intel part among the stronger performers overall.

# Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14500T uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The process node difference is significant: the AMD part uses a smaller node, which typically contributes to better power efficiency, while the Intel part uses a larger node across a desktop-oriented design.

Core counts differ. The AMD part has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel part has 14 cores and 20 threads. Both support 20 threads, but the Intel chip achieves this with more physical cores, suggesting a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores typical of Raptor Lake designs. The AMD part uses Zen 5 and Zen 5c core types, which also implies a heterogeneous core arrangement, but with fewer total cores.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure. Both parts list 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip provides more L2 per core and more total L3 cache, which can benefit workloads with larger working sets. Die size also differs: the AMD part measures 233 mm², while the Intel part measures 215 mm².

Memory support diverges. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with dual-channel memory bus and a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory, which is a shared feature for reliability-sensitive embedded and workstation use.

PCIe generation differs. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip has a newer PCIe standard, which allows for faster data transfer to compatible devices, though it requires matching hardware to take advantage.

Sockets and market segments reflect different deployment targets. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8 and is classified as a mobile processor. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop processor. The AMD part was released in 2026, while the Intel part was released in 2024. The Intel part also has a launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.

# FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores. Both processors support 20 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 and the Intel Core i5-14500T support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-14500T's boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core i5-14500T supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has a TDP of 28 W, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-14500T's TDP of 35 W.

# Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores. Both have 20 threads. Base clocks differ: the AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz, the Intel part at 1.70 GHz. Boost clocks also differ: the AMD part reaches 5.00 GHz, the Intel part reaches 4.80 GHz.

TDP values diverge. The AMD part is rated at 28 W, the Intel part at 35 W. Sockets are incompatible with each other: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The process nodes differ: the AMD part uses 4 nm at TSMC, the Intel part uses 10 nm at Intel. Die sizes differ as well: 233 mm² for the AMD part, 215 mm² for the Intel part.

Cache specifications differ in L2 and L3. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3. L1 cache is the same at 80 KB per core.

Memory support differs. The AMD part lists DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part lists DDR4 and DDR5, with no memory bandwidth figure. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe support differs. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 880M, the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

Market segments differ. The AMD part is mobile, the Intel part is desktop. Release dates differ: the AMD part was released in 2026, the Intel part in 2024. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP. Both parts have locked multipliers, meaning they are not unlocked for overclocking. The Intel part has a known part number, SRN3P, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries comparing these two processors directly. However, the Intel Core i5-14500T has a full set of recorded benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has none. This means the only quantitative comparison available comes from the Intel part's absolute scores and its percentile ranking.

The Intel Core i5-14500T achieves a percentile rank of 80 among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 28065. Its nearest rivals are clustered closely around this score. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054, which is effectively a 0 percent difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28032, a 0.1 percent difference. The Intel Core i9-12900H scores 28003, a 0.2 percent difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28128, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Intel part. This tight grouping indicates that the Intel Core i5-14500T sits at a performance plateau shared by several competing processors.

In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Intel part scores 11790. In R20 multicore, it scores 8177. In R15 multicore, it scores 2022. These descending scores across newer benchmark versions reflect the increasing workload intensity of each successive Cinebench release. Single-core scores follow a similar pattern: 1838 in R23, 1154 in R20, and 252 in R15.

Geekbench results place the Intel part at 11894 multicore and 2229 single-core. These scores indicate balanced performance across synthetic integer and floating-point workloads. PassMark results provide more granular insights. The Intel part scores 262417 in data compression, 15410 in data encryption, 16043 in extended instructions, 81 in find prime numbers, 58869 in floating point math, 80922 in integer math, 22910 in multithread, 1288 in physics, 28462 in random string sorting, and 3736 in both single-thread and singlethread tests.

The data shows a processor designed for consistent multi-threaded throughput. The multithread score of 22910 and the Cinebench multicore results confirm that the Intel part delivers strong parallel performance. The single-thread score of 3736 in PassMark, paired with the Cinebench single-core results, confirms capable lightly threaded performance as well.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 has no scores in any of these tests. As a result, the database offers no measured evidence of its performance in Cinebench, Geekbench, or PassMark workloads. The AMD part's specifications suggest it can operate at a higher boost clock and lower TDP, but without recorded benchmark data, any performance conclusion would be speculative. The percentile rank of 50 for the AMD part, compared to 80 for the Intel part, indicates that the database places the AMD part at the median of all CPUs, while the Intel part sits well above the median.

The Intel part's nearest rival comparisons show that its average benchmark score of 28065 is essentially tied with several other processors. The largest delta among its nearest rivals is 0.2 percent, which is within measurement noise for most benchmark suites. This suggests that the Intel Core i5-14500T does not lead its immediate competitive set by a meaningful margin, but it also does not trail by one. It holds a stable middle position among a group of similarly performing CPUs.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174, the absence of benchmark data means the head-to-head comparison is limited to architectural and specification differences. The AMD part uses a smaller process node, a higher boost clock, and a lower TDP. The Intel part uses more cores, more L3 cache, and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Intel part also has a higher percentile rank and a complete benchmark profile.

The recorded data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14500T is a well-rounded desktop processor with verified performance across multiple benchmark suites. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174 is a mobile-oriented processor with specifications that emphasize efficiency and integration, but its performance remains unmeasured in the database. Any direct performance comparison between the two parts must rely on the Intel part's scores alone, which show a processor that performs strongly in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads, with a percentile rank of 80 and an average benchmark score of 28065.